Roll-off: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Spinningspark (talk | contribs)
m v2.05 - Fix errors for CW project (Link equal to linktext)
 
(68 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
:''This article is about roll-off in electrical network analysis. For the dumpster, see [[roll-off (dumpster)]].''
{{Short description|Steepness of a transfer function with frequency, particularly in electrical network analysis}}
{{About|roll-off in electrical network analysis|the dumpster|Roll-off (dumpster)}}


'''Roll-off''' is a term commonly used in electrical network analysis, most especially in connection with [[filter (signal processing)|filter circuits]], to describe the steepness of a network's [[transmission function]] with [[frequency]] in the transition between a [[passband]] and a [[stopband]]. The function of frequency most usually being considered is the [[insertion loss]] of the network, but could in principle be any function of frequency related to the network. It is usual to measure roll-off as a function of [[logarithmic scale|logarithmic]] frequency, consequently, the units of roll-off are either [[decibel]]s per decade (dB/decade) or decibels per [[octave]] (dB/8ve). A decade being a x10 increase in frequency and an octave being a x2 increase in frequency.
'''Roll-off''' is the steepness of a [[transfer function]] with [[frequency]], particularly in [[network analysis (electrical circuits)|electrical network analysis]], and most especially in connection with [[filter (signal processing)|filter circuits]] in the transition between a [[passband]] and a [[stopband]]. It is most typically applied to the [[insertion loss]] of the network, but can, in principle, be applied to any relevant function of frequency, and any technology, not just electronics. It is usual to measure roll-off as a function of [[logarithmic scale|logarithmic]] frequency; consequently, the units of roll-off are either [[decibel]]s per [[decade (log scale)|decade]] (dB/decade), where a decade is a tenfold increase in frequency, or decibels per [[octave (electronics)|octave]] (dB/8ve), where an octave is a twofold increase in frequency.


The usefulness of the concept of roll-off stems from the fact that in many networks roll-off tends towards a constant at frequencies above [[cut-off frequency|cut-off]] and well away from the "knee" of the frequency curve. Roll-off enables the cut-off performance of a filter network to be reduced to a single number. Note that roll-off can occur with decreasing frequency as well as increasing frequency. This depends on the [[:File:Bandform template.svg|bandform]] of the filter being considered: for instance a [[low-pass filter]] will roll-off with increasing frequency, but a [[high-pass filter]] or the lower [[stopband]] of a [[band-pass filter]] will roll-off with decreasing frequency. To avoid trying to cover all cases using torturous language, this article describes low-pass filters with roll-off increasing with frequency. This is to be taken in the spirit of [[prototype filter]]s: when dealing with filters with roll-off decreasing with frequency phrases such as "above cut-off frequency" are to be read as "below cut-off frequency" and vice versa.
The concept of roll-off stems from the fact that in many networks roll-off tends towards a constant gradient at frequencies well away from the [[cut-off frequency|cut-off]] point of the frequency curve. Roll-off enables the cut-off performance of such a filter network to be reduced to a single number. Note that roll-off can occur with decreasing frequency as well as increasing frequency, depending on the [[:File:Bandform template.svg|bandform]] of the filter being considered: for instance a [[low-pass filter]] will roll-off with increasing frequency, but a [[high-pass filter]] or the lower [[stopband]] of a [[band-pass filter]] will roll-off with decreasing frequency. For brevity, this article describes only low-pass filters. This is to be taken in the spirit of [[prototype filter]]s; the same principles may be applied to high-pass filters by interchanging phrases such as "above cut-off frequency" and "below cut-off frequency".


==First order roll-off==
==First-order roll-off==
[[File:First order RC circuit.svg|thumb|250px|First order RC filter [[low-pass filter]] circuit.]]
[[File:First order RC circuit.svg|thumb|250px|First-order RC filter [[low-pass filter]] circuit.]]
[[File:Roll-off graph 6dB.svg|thumb|250px|Roll-off of a first order low-pass filter at 6dB/8ve (20dB/decade)]]
[[File:Roll-off graph 6dB.svg|thumb|250px|Roll-off of a first-order low-pass filter at 6 dB/octave (20 dB/decade)]]
A simple [[First order linear differential equation|first order]] network such as a [[RC circuit]] will have a roll-off of 20dB/decade. This is approximately equal (to within normal engineering required accuracy) to 6dB/8ve and is the more usual description given for this roll-off. This can be shown to be so by considering the voltage [[transfer function]], ''A'', of the RC network:
A simple [[First-order linear differential equation|first-order]] network such as a [[RC circuit]] will have a roll-off of 20&nbsp;dB/decade. This is approximately equal (to within normal engineering required accuracy) to 6&nbsp;dB/octave and is the more usual description given for this roll-off. This can be shown to be so by considering the voltage [[transfer function]], ''A'', of the RC network:<ref name=Jacob>J. Michael Jacob, ''Advanced AC circuits and electronics: principles & applications'', pages 150-152, Cengage Learning 2003 {{ISBN|0-7668-2330-X}}.</ref>


:<math>A=\frac{V_o}{V_i}=\frac{1}{1+i\omega RC}</math>
:<math>A=\frac{V_o}{V_i}=\frac{1}{1+i\omega RC}</math>


[[Prototype filter#Frequency scaling|Frequency scaling]] this to ''ω''<sub>c</sub>=1/''RC''=1 and forming the power ratio gives,
[[Prototype filter#Frequency scaling|Frequency scaling]] this to ''ω''<sub>c</sub>&nbsp;=&nbsp;1/''RC''&nbsp;=&nbsp;1 and forming the power ratio gives,


:<math>|A|^2=\frac{1}{1+\left( {\omega \over \omega_c} \right)^2} = \frac{1}{1+\omega^2}</math>
:<math>|A|^2=\frac{1}{1+\left( {\omega \over \omega_c} \right)^2} = \frac{1}{1+\omega^2}</math>
Line 41: Line 42:


==Higher order networks==
==Higher order networks==
[[File:Roll-off graph multiple.svg|thumb|250px|Roll-off graph higher orderr low-pass filters showing various rates of roll-off]]
[[File:High order buffered RC circuit.svg|thumb|500px|left|Multiple order RC filter buffered between stages.]]
[[File:Roll-off graph multiple.svg|thumb|250px|none|Roll-off graph of higher-order low-pass filters showing various rates of roll-off]]
A higher order network can be constructed by cascading first order sections together. If a [[unity gain buffer amplifier]] is placed between each section (or some other [[active filter|active topology]] is used) there is no interaction between the stages. In that circumstance, for ''n'' identical first order sections in cascade, the voltage transfer function of the complete network is given by;
A higher order network can be constructed by cascading first-order sections together. If a [[unity gain buffer amplifier]] is placed between each section (or some other [[active filter|active topology]] is used) there is no interaction between the stages. In that circumstance, for ''n'' identical first-order sections in cascade, the voltage transfer function of the complete network is given by;<ref name=Jacob/>


:<math>A_{\mathrm T}=A^n</math>
:<math>A_{\mathrm T}=A^n \ </math>


consequently, the total roll-off is given by,
consequently, the total roll-off is given by,


:<math>\Delta L_T = n \Delta L = 6n \ \mathrm{dB/8ve}</math>
:<math>\Delta L_\text{T} = n \, \Delta L = 6n \text{ dB/8ve}</math>


Even if the sections are not identical, the roll-off will still tend to 6''n'' dB/8ve at a frequency well above the highest ''ω''<sub>c</sub> when buffered sections are being considered. A similar effect can be achieved in the [[digital filter|digital domain]] by repeatedly applying the same filtering algorithm to the signal.<ref>Todd, pp107-108</ref>
A similar effect can be achieved in the [[digital filter|digital domain]] by repeatedly applying the same filtering algorithm to the signal.<ref>Todd, pp 107–108</ref>


[[File:LC ladder circuit.svg|thumb|500px|LC low-pass ladder circuit. Each element (that is L or C) adds an order to the filter and a [[pole (complex analysis)|pole]] to the [[driving point impedance]].]]
==Passive networks==
The calculation of transfer function becomes somewhat more complicated when the sections are not all identical, or when the popular [[ladder topology]] construction is used to realise the filter. In a ladder filter each section of the filter has an effect on its immediate neighbours and a lesser effect on more remote sections so the response is not a simple ''A<sup>n</sup>'' even when all the sections are identical. For some filter classes, such as the [[Butterworth filter]], the insertion loss is still [[monotonic function|monotonically]] increasing with frequency and quickly [[Asymptote|asymptotically]] converges to a roll-off of 6''n''&nbsp;dB/8ve, but in others, such as the [[Chebyshev filter|Chebyshev]] or [[elliptic filter]] the roll-off near the cut-off frequency is much faster and elsewhere the response is anything but monotonic. Nevertheless, all filter classes eventually converge to a roll-off of 6''n''&nbsp;dB/8ve theoretically at some arbitrarily high frequency, but in many applications this will occur in a frequency band of no interest to the application and [[parasitic capacitance|parasitic effects]] may well start to dominate long before this happens.<ref>Giovanni Bianchi, Roberto Sorrentino, ''Electronic filter simulation & design'', pages 129–130, McGraw-Hill Professional 2007 {{ISBN|0-07-149467-7}}.</ref>


==Applications==
For entirely passive topologies the situation is a little more complicated. In the popular [[ladder topology]] construction of passive filters, each section of the filter has an effect on its immediate neighbours and a lesser effect on more remote sections. The nature of the transfer function is highly dependent on the design realisation method used. For an order ''n'' [[Butterworth filter]] the roll-off actually is [[Asymptote|asymptotic]] to 6''n'' dB/8ve. This filter is designed to have a [[monotonic function|monotonically]] increasing loss with frequency tending towards the asymptotic value with increasing frequency. However, for other filters using exactly the same topology, but a different realisation method, the result can be radically different. Examples here are the [[Chebyshev filter]] and [[elliptic filter]], both of which have faster roll-offs than the Butterworth and are anything but monotonic.
Filters with a high roll-off were first developed to prevent crosstalk between adjacent channels on telephone [[Frequency division multiplexing|FDM]] systems.<ref>Lundheim, L, "On Shannon and "Shannon's Formula", ''Telektronikk'', '''vol. 98''', no. 1, 2002, pp. 24–25.</ref> Roll-off is also significant on audio loudspeaker [[audio crossover|crossover filters]]: here the need is not so much for a high roll-off but that the roll-offs of the high frequency and low-frequency sections are symmetrical and complementary. An interesting need for high roll-off arises in [[EEG]] machines. Here the filters mostly make do with a basic 6&nbsp;dB/8ve roll-off, however, some instruments provide a switchable 35 Hz filter at the high frequency end with a faster roll-off to help filter out noise generated by muscle activity.<ref>Mayer et al, pp 104–105.</ref>

==See also==
*[[Bode plot]]


==Notes==
==Notes==
Line 60: Line 67:


==References==
==References==
*J. William Helton, Orlando Merino, ''Classical control using H [infinity] methods: an introduction to design'', pages 23-25, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 1998 ISBN 0898714249.
*J. William Helton, Orlando Merino, ''Classical control using H [infinity] methods: an introduction to design'', pages 23–25, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 1998 {{ISBN|0-89871-424-9}}.
*Todd C. Handy, ''Event-related potentials: a methods handbook'', pages 89-92, 107-109, MIT Press 2004 ISBN 0262083337.
*Todd C. Handy, ''Event-related potentials: a methods handbook'', pages 89–92, 107–109, MIT Press 2004 {{ISBN|0-262-08333-7}}.
*Fay S. Tyner, John Russell Knott, W. Brem Mayer, ''Fundamentals of EEG Technology: Basic concepts and methods'', pages 101-102, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1983 ISBN 089004385X.
*Fay S. Tyner, John Russell Knott, W. Brem Mayer (ed.), ''Fundamentals of EEG Technology: Basic concepts and methods'', pages 101–102, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1983 {{ISBN|0-89004-385-X}}.


[[Category:Electronic design]]
[[Category:Tone, EQ and filter]]
[[Category:Filter frequency response]]

Latest revision as of 20:14, 24 March 2023

Roll-off is the steepness of a transfer function with frequency, particularly in electrical network analysis, and most especially in connection with filter circuits in the transition between a passband and a stopband. It is most typically applied to the insertion loss of the network, but can, in principle, be applied to any relevant function of frequency, and any technology, not just electronics. It is usual to measure roll-off as a function of logarithmic frequency; consequently, the units of roll-off are either decibels per decade (dB/decade), where a decade is a tenfold increase in frequency, or decibels per octave (dB/8ve), where an octave is a twofold increase in frequency.

The concept of roll-off stems from the fact that in many networks roll-off tends towards a constant gradient at frequencies well away from the cut-off point of the frequency curve. Roll-off enables the cut-off performance of such a filter network to be reduced to a single number. Note that roll-off can occur with decreasing frequency as well as increasing frequency, depending on the bandform of the filter being considered: for instance a low-pass filter will roll-off with increasing frequency, but a high-pass filter or the lower stopband of a band-pass filter will roll-off with decreasing frequency. For brevity, this article describes only low-pass filters. This is to be taken in the spirit of prototype filters; the same principles may be applied to high-pass filters by interchanging phrases such as "above cut-off frequency" and "below cut-off frequency".

First-order roll-off[edit]

First-order RC filter low-pass filter circuit.
Roll-off of a first-order low-pass filter at 6 dB/octave (20 dB/decade)

A simple first-order network such as a RC circuit will have a roll-off of 20 dB/decade. This is approximately equal (to within normal engineering required accuracy) to 6 dB/octave and is the more usual description given for this roll-off. This can be shown to be so by considering the voltage transfer function, A, of the RC network:[1]

Frequency scaling this to ωc = 1/RC = 1 and forming the power ratio gives,

In decibels this becomes,

or expressed as a loss,

At frequencies well above ω=1, this simplifies to,

Roll-off is given by,

For a decade this is;

and for an octave,

Higher order networks[edit]

Multiple order RC filter buffered between stages.
Roll-off graph of higher-order low-pass filters showing various rates of roll-off

A higher order network can be constructed by cascading first-order sections together. If a unity gain buffer amplifier is placed between each section (or some other active topology is used) there is no interaction between the stages. In that circumstance, for n identical first-order sections in cascade, the voltage transfer function of the complete network is given by;[1]

consequently, the total roll-off is given by,

A similar effect can be achieved in the digital domain by repeatedly applying the same filtering algorithm to the signal.[2]

LC low-pass ladder circuit. Each element (that is L or C) adds an order to the filter and a pole to the driving point impedance.

The calculation of transfer function becomes somewhat more complicated when the sections are not all identical, or when the popular ladder topology construction is used to realise the filter. In a ladder filter each section of the filter has an effect on its immediate neighbours and a lesser effect on more remote sections so the response is not a simple An even when all the sections are identical. For some filter classes, such as the Butterworth filter, the insertion loss is still monotonically increasing with frequency and quickly asymptotically converges to a roll-off of 6n dB/8ve, but in others, such as the Chebyshev or elliptic filter the roll-off near the cut-off frequency is much faster and elsewhere the response is anything but monotonic. Nevertheless, all filter classes eventually converge to a roll-off of 6n dB/8ve theoretically at some arbitrarily high frequency, but in many applications this will occur in a frequency band of no interest to the application and parasitic effects may well start to dominate long before this happens.[3]

Applications[edit]

Filters with a high roll-off were first developed to prevent crosstalk between adjacent channels on telephone FDM systems.[4] Roll-off is also significant on audio loudspeaker crossover filters: here the need is not so much for a high roll-off but that the roll-offs of the high frequency and low-frequency sections are symmetrical and complementary. An interesting need for high roll-off arises in EEG machines. Here the filters mostly make do with a basic 6 dB/8ve roll-off, however, some instruments provide a switchable 35 Hz filter at the high frequency end with a faster roll-off to help filter out noise generated by muscle activity.[5]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b J. Michael Jacob, Advanced AC circuits and electronics: principles & applications, pages 150-152, Cengage Learning 2003 ISBN 0-7668-2330-X.
  2. ^ Todd, pp 107–108
  3. ^ Giovanni Bianchi, Roberto Sorrentino, Electronic filter simulation & design, pages 129–130, McGraw-Hill Professional 2007 ISBN 0-07-149467-7.
  4. ^ Lundheim, L, "On Shannon and "Shannon's Formula", Telektronikk, vol. 98, no. 1, 2002, pp. 24–25.
  5. ^ Mayer et al, pp 104–105.

References[edit]

  • J. William Helton, Orlando Merino, Classical control using H [infinity] methods: an introduction to design, pages 23–25, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 1998 ISBN 0-89871-424-9.
  • Todd C. Handy, Event-related potentials: a methods handbook, pages 89–92, 107–109, MIT Press 2004 ISBN 0-262-08333-7.
  • Fay S. Tyner, John Russell Knott, W. Brem Mayer (ed.), Fundamentals of EEG Technology: Basic concepts and methods, pages 101–102, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1983 ISBN 0-89004-385-X.