Talk:Lilian, Princess of Réthy: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 18:01, 16 February 2024

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Mid-importance).

Belgium Mid‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

What was the first name of Cardinal Van Roey? -- Zoe

She was never queen-consort, only princess-consort, shouldn't the name of the article be therefore different? like, Lilian, Princess of Rethy or something like that? see Albert, Prince Consort. Gryffindor 15:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She was, however, the consort to a king regardless of her title. It's an exception to the rule I'd say, but I would support renaming the article to Lilian, princesse de Réthy or Lilian, Princess of Réthy as she held that title as her own, regardless of its technical legality. Charles 17:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unbalanced & disputed content[edit]

Not only does this article take a peacock tone toward its subject while completely lacking inline citations, but it asserts a narrative (The Queen Mother's role in the romance, the rationale for the alleged religious ceremony and for the (illegally) subsequent civil marriage, the reasons Lilian did not bear the title of queen, etc) that is nether proven nor agreed upon. Worse it asserts as fact that opposition to the marriage, and its importance to the Question royale later, resulted from the machinations of Leopold III's political enemies rather than from the immediate, widespread view of many Belgians that the marriage was simply inappropriate. Lethiere (talk) 02:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Queen[edit]

Wait she "declined" to be Queen? So she had a say in what title she was going to recieve? This doesn't sound right to me since her descendants were going to be excluded from the throne. Wasn't she just a morganatic spouse rather than a women who declined to be Queen, which sounds more like the future Camilla in the UK.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 05:47, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|living=no|listas=Lilian, Princess of Rethy|
-{{WPBiography
+{{WikiProject Biography|royalty-work-group=yes|royalty-priority=Mid}}
-|living=no
+{{WikiProject Belgium|importance=Mid}}
-|class=
+{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=Mid}}
-|priority=
 }}
+==Untitled==
 What was the first name of Cardinal Van Roey? -- [[User:Zoe|Zoe]]
+She was never queen-consort, only princess-consort, shouldn't the name of the article be therefore different? like, Lilian, Princess of Rethy or something like that? see [[Albert, Prince Consort]]. [[User:Gryffindor|<span style="color:red;">Gryffindor</span>]] 15:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
+:She was, however, the consort to a king regardless of her title. It's an exception to the rule I'd say, but I would support renaming the article to [[Lilian, princesse de Réthy]] or [[Lilian, Princess of Réthy]] as she held that title as her own, regardless of its technical legality. [[User talk:Charles|Charles]] 17:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
+== Unbalanced & disputed content ==
+Not only does this article take a [[WP:peacock#Don't peacock your facts|peacock]] tone toward its subject while completely lacking [[WP:CITE|inline citations]], but it asserts a narrative (The Queen Mother's role in the romance, the rationale for the alleged religious ceremony and for the (illegally) subsequent civil marriage, the reasons Lilian did not bear the title of queen, etc) that is nether proven nor agreed upon. Worse it asserts as fact that opposition to the marriage, and its importance to the ''[[Leopold III of Belgium#World War II and controversy|Question royale]]'' later, resulted from the machinations of Leopold III's political enemies rather than from the immediate, widespread view of many Belgians that the marriage was simply inappropriate. [[User:Lethiere|Lethiere]] ([[User talk:Lethiere|talk]]) 02:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
+== Queen ==
+Wait she "declined" to be Queen? So she had a say in what title she was going to recieve? This doesn't sound right to me since her descendants were going to be excluded from the throne. Wasn't she just a morganatic spouse rather than a women who declined to be Queen, which sounds more like the future Camilla in the UK.--[[User:Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy|Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy]] ([[User talk:Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy|talk]]) 05:47, 9 December 2010 (UTC)