Jump to content

Urreligion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎History: copy edit
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
exp ref, not a stub
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Form of religious tradition}}
{{wikt | urreligion}}
{{wikt | urreligion}}
⚫
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2021}}
'''''Urreligion''''' is a postulated "original" or "oldest" form of [[religious tradition]] (the [[German language |German]] [[prefix]] {{wikt-lang|de|ur-}} expressing the idea of "original", "primitive", "elder", "primeval", or "''{{wt|en|proto-}}''"). The concept contrasts with that of [[organized religion]], as found (for example) in the [[theocracy| theocracies]] of the early [[Cities of the Ancient Near East| urban]] cultures of the [[Ancient Near East]] or in [[major religions| world religions]] as they have developed.
'''''Urreligion''''' is a postulated "original" or "oldest" form of [[religious tradition]] (the [[German language|German]] [[prefix]] {{wikt-lang|de|ur-}} expressing the idea of "original", "primal", "primitive", "elder", "primeval", or "''{{wt|en|proto-}}''"). The concept contrasts with later [[organized religion|organized religions]] such as the early [[theocracy|theocracies]] of the [[Ancient Near East]] and in later [[major religions|world religions]].
The term ''Urreligion'' originated in the context of [[German Romanticism]].
The term ''Urreligion'' originated in the context of [[German Romanticism]].


==History==
==History==
[[Friedrich Creuzer]] put forward the notion of a monotheistic primeval religion in 1810 – an idea taken up by other authors of the [[Romantic period]], such as [[J. J. Bachofen]],<ref>In his ''Mutterrecht und Urreligion '', Bachofen connects primeval religion and [[matriarchy]].</ref> but decidedly opposed by [[Johann Heinrich Voss]].<ref>''Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker, besonders der Griechen. In Vorträgen und Entwürfen.'' Leipzig and Darmstadt, Heyer und Leske, 1810–1812.</ref> [[Goethe]], in a conversation with [[Eckermann]] on 11 March 1832, discussed the human ''Urreligion'', which he characterized as "pure nature and [pure] reason, of divine origin".<ref>[http://www.zeno.org/Literatur/M/Goethe,+Johann+Wolfgang/Gespr%C3%A4che/%5BZu+den+Gespr%C3%A4chen%5D/1832 Gespräche]</ref>
[[Friedrich Creuzer]] put forward the notion of a monotheistic primeval religion in 1810 – an idea taken up by other authors of the [[Romantic period]], such as [[J. J. Bachofen]],<ref>In his ''Mutterrecht und Urreligion '', Bachofen connects primeval religion and [[matriarchy]].</ref> but decidedly opposed by [[Johann Heinrich Voss]].<ref>''Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker, besonders der Griechen. In Vorträgen und Entwürfen.'' Leipzig and Darmstadt, Heyer und Leske, 1810–1812.</ref> [[Goethe]], in a conversation with [[Eckermann]] on 11 March 1832, discussed the human ''Urreligion'', which he characterized as "pure nature and [pure] reason, of divine origin".<ref>[http://www.zeno.org/Literatur/M/Goethe,+Johann+Wolfgang/Gespr%C3%A4che/%5BZu+den+Gespr%C3%A4chen%5D/1832 Gespräche]</ref>
The final scene of his ''[[Faust Part Two]]'' (1832) has been taken as evoking "the 'Urreligion' of mankind".<ref>O. Durrani, "Biblical Borrowings in Goethe's 'Faust': A Historical Survey of Their Interpretation", ''The Modern Language Review'' 1977</ref>
The final scene of his ''[[Faust Part Two]]'' (1832) has been taken as evoking "the 'Urreligion' of mankind".<ref>O. Durrani, "Biblical Borrowings in Goethe's 'Faust': A Historical Survey of Their Interpretation", ''The Modern Language Review'' 1977</ref>


Often used in the sense of [[natural religion]] or [[indigenous religion]], the religious behaviour of pre-modern [[tribal societies]] such as [[shamanism]], [[animism]] and [[ancestor worship]] (e.g. [[Australian aboriginal mythology]]<ref>{{cite news |title=Flood gave birth to world's oldest religion |date=2 November 1996 |first=Leigh |last=Dayton |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg15220540.600-flood-gave-birth-to-worlds-oldest-religion.html newscientist.com |access-date=15 August 2020}}</ref>), the term ''Urreligion'' has also been used by adherents of various religions to back up the claim that their own religion is somehow "primeval" or "older" than competing traditions. In the context of a given religious faith, literal belief in a [[creation myth|creation]] may be the base of primality. (e.g. [[Biblical literalism]], or literal belief in the [[Hindu]] [[Puranas]]).
Often used in the sense of [[natural religion]] or [[indigenous religion]], the religious behaviour of pre-modern [[tribal societies]] such as [[shamanism]], [[animism]] and [[ancestor worship]] (e.g. [[Australian aboriginal mythology]]<ref>{{cite news |title=Flood gave birth to world's oldest religion |date=2 November 1996 |first=Leigh |last=Dayton |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg15220540.600-flood-gave-birth-to-worlds-oldest-religion.html |access-date=15 August 2020}}</ref>), the term ''Urreligion'' has also been used by adherents of various religions to back up the claim that their own religion is somehow "primeval" or "older" than competing traditions. In the context of a given religious faith, literal belief in a [[creation myth|creation]] may be the base of primality. (e.g. [[Biblical literalism]], or literal belief in the [[Hindu]] [[Puranas]]).


In particular, [[Urmonotheismus]] comprises the historical claim that primeval religion was [[monotheistic]]. Some have rejected this hypothesis,<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0Kf1ZwDifdAC&pg=PA136&dq=urmonotheism |title=No Other Gods: Emergent Monotheism in Israel|page=136|first=Robert Karl|last=Gnuse|publisher=Sheffield Academic Press|year=1997|isbn=1-85075-657-0}}</ref> and certain [[Christian apologetics]] circles defend it.<ref>Pajak, Sylwester, ''Urreligion und Uroffenbarung bei P. W. Schmidt'', St. Augustin 1978.</ref>
In particular, [[Urmonotheismus]] comprises the historical claim that primeval religion was [[monotheistic]]. Some have rejected this hypothesis,<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0Kf1ZwDifdAC&q=urmonotheism&pg=PA136 |title=No Other Gods: Emergent Monotheism in Israel|page=136|first=Robert Karl|last=Gnuse|publisher=Sheffield Academic Press|year=1997|isbn=1-85075-657-0}}</ref> and certain [[Christian apologetics]] circles defend it.<ref>Pajak, Sylwester, ''Urreligion und Uroffenbarung bei P. W. Schmidt'', St. Augustin 1978.</ref>


Nineteenth-century [[Germanic mysticism]] sometimes claimed that the [[Germanic runes]] bore testimony of a primeval religion.<ref>J. L. Studach, [https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_YmgCAAAAQAAJ <!-- quote=Urreligion. --> ''Die Urreligion oder das entdeckte Uralphabet''], 1856</ref> Some more recent [[new religious movements]] that claim to restore primeval religion include [[Godianism]]<ref>{{cite book |last = Onyioha |first = K. O. K. |title = African Godianism : a revolutionary religion for mankind through direct communication with God |year = 1980 |publisher = Conch Magazine |location = [[Owerri]]; New York |isbn = 0914970313 |pages = [https://archive.org/details/africangodianism0000onyi/page/124 124] |url-access = registration |url = https://archive.org/details/africangodianism0000onyi/page/124}}</ref> and [[Umbanda]].<ref>Gerhard Muller, ''Theologische Realenzyklopädie'', de Gruyter (2003), p. 265</ref>
Nineteenth-century [[Germanic mysticism]] sometimes claimed that the [[Germanic runes]] bore testimony of a primeval religion.<ref>J. L. Studach, [https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_YmgCAAAAQAAJ <!-- quote=Urreligion. --> ''Die Urreligion oder das entdeckte Uralphabet''], 1856</ref> Some more recent [[new religious movements]] that claim to restore primeval religion include [[Godianism]]<ref>{{cite book |last = Onyioha |first = K. O. K. |title = African Godianism : a revolutionary religion for mankind through direct communication with God |year = 1980 |publisher = Conch Magazine |location = [[Owerri]]; New York |isbn = 0914970313 |pages = [https://archive.org/details/africangodianism0000onyi/page/124 124] |url-access = registration |url = https://archive.org/details/africangodianism0000onyi/page/124}}</ref> and [[Umbanda]].<ref>[[Gerhard Müller (Lutheran theologian)|Gerhard Müller]], ''Theologische Realenzyklopädie'', [[De Gruyter]] (2003), p. 265</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
* [[Ancient Semitic religion]]
* [[Paleolithic religion]]
* [[Perennial philosophy]]
* [[Prehistoric religion]]
* [[Prehistoric religion]]
* [[Proto-religion (disambiguation)]]
* [[Proto-Indo-European religion]]
* [[Proto-Indo-European religion]]
* [[Evolutionary origin of religions]]
* [[Traditionalist school]]
* [[UR Group]]
* [[Tradition (perennialism)]]


==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:1810 introductions]]
⚫
{{Use dmy dates|date = March 2011}}

[[Category:Prehistoric religion]]
[[Category:Prehistoric religion]]
[[Category:History of religion]]
[[Category:History of religion studies]]
⚫
[[Category:Religious studies]]
[[Category:Superlatives in religion]]
[[Category:Superlatives in religion]]
⚫
[[Category:Romantic idealism]]


{{reli-studies-stub}}

Latest revision as of 08:33, 16 May 2024

Look up urreligion in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

Urreligion is a postulated "original" or "oldest" form of religious tradition (the German prefix ur- expressing the idea of "original", "primal", "primitive", "elder", "primeval", or "proto-"). The concept contrasts with later organized religions such as the early theocracies of the Ancient Near East and in later world religions. The term Urreligion originated in the context of German Romanticism.

History[edit]

Friedrich Creuzer put forward the notion of a monotheistic primeval religion in 1810 – an idea taken up by other authors of the Romantic period, such as J. J. Bachofen,[1] but decidedly opposed by Johann Heinrich Voss.[2] Goethe, in a conversation with Eckermann on 11 March 1832, discussed the human Urreligion, which he characterized as "pure nature and [pure] reason, of divine origin".[3] The final scene of his Faust Part Two (1832) has been taken as evoking "the 'Urreligion' of mankind".[4]

Often used in the sense of natural religion or indigenous religion, the religious behaviour of pre-modern tribal societies such as shamanism, animism and ancestor worship (e.g. Australian aboriginal mythology[5]), the term Urreligion has also been used by adherents of various religions to back up the claim that their own religion is somehow "primeval" or "older" than competing traditions. In the context of a given religious faith, literal belief in a creation may be the base of primality. (e.g. Biblical literalism, or literal belief in the Hindu Puranas).

In particular, Urmonotheismus comprises the historical claim that primeval religion was monotheistic. Some have rejected this hypothesis,[6] and certain Christian apologetics circles defend it.[7]

Nineteenth-century Germanic mysticism sometimes claimed that the Germanic runes bore testimony of a primeval religion.[8] Some more recent new religious movements that claim to restore primeval religion include Godianism[9] and Umbanda.[10]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ In his Mutterrecht und Urreligion , Bachofen connects primeval religion and matriarchy.
  2. ^ Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker, besonders der Griechen. In Vorträgen und Entwürfen. Leipzig and Darmstadt, Heyer und Leske, 1810–1812.
  3. ^ Gespräche
  4. ^ O. Durrani, "Biblical Borrowings in Goethe's 'Faust': A Historical Survey of Their Interpretation", The Modern Language Review 1977
  5. ^ Dayton, Leigh (2 November 1996). "Flood gave birth to world's oldest religion". Retrieved 15 August 2020.
  6. ^ Gnuse, Robert Karl (1997). No Other Gods: Emergent Monotheism in Israel. Sheffield Academic Press. p. 136. ISBN 1-85075-657-0.
  7. ^ Pajak, Sylwester, Urreligion und Uroffenbarung bei P. W. Schmidt, St. Augustin 1978.
  8. ^ J. L. Studach, Die Urreligion oder das entdeckte Uralphabet, 1856
  9. ^ Onyioha, K. O. K. (1980). African Godianism : a revolutionary religion for mankind through direct communication with God. Owerri; New York: Conch Magazine. pp. 124. ISBN 0914970313.
  10. ^ Gerhard Müller, Theologische Realenzyklopädie, De Gruyter (2003), p. 265
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Urreligion&oldid=1224105696"