User talk:Nymf

For archived discussions, click here. Please do not edit the archives, but start a new discussion instead.

Got your note

I will contact an admin buddy to intervene on the user. Thanks for the heads up. PS... you are a very good editor.... keep of the diligent effort to uncruft heavy metal articles. Cheers!! The Real Libs-speak politely 17:16, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Pink Floyd date range

Hi Elizabeth. You and I have been making many reverts to attempts to change Pink Floyd's "years of activity" in the infobox and article. You have been catching most of the attempts to change the start date from 1964 to 1965, and I've been in agreement because I thought consensus was reached for that. But looking at the talk page section, Talk:Pink Floyd#Pink Floyd's year of formation, the opposite appears to be true, consensus is for 1965. I think this needs to be addressed if we are to continue reverting. We should provide a good reason for making it 1964 on the talk page. Either that, or agree that 1965 is correct. Any thoughts? --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 20:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh. You are right. I figured that 1964 was the consensus, since it was in the section header of the Syd Barrett lead era, and all. They do make a valid point about the fact that former Sigma 6 members can't be considered a part of Pink Floyd, however, so I will settle with that agreement. In my defense, I probably wouldn't have made any reverts if they would have bothered to state this using the summary box. :-) Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 20:39, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll give an amen on that. It will be tricky making the personnel list match the infobox. Have a look at the change and see if this will fly. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 21:01, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Den Saakaldte

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Den Saakaldte, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rettetast (talk) 07:27, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Greetings

I am a semi-retired user. I once made many edits every day but not only get one once in a long while. I happened to notice you talking to a user when I went to that user's talk page. Your contributions are impressive. Not to mention you seem to actually know your shit when it comes to black metal. Transilvanian Hunger is great. Not to mention your name is pretty killer. I would like to invite you to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Black Metal. You could be of great help there and both you and the project would most likely mutually benefit. At the project we strive to standardize and improve black metal-related articles. You can keep editing anything else you want to, of course, but at the project you would be able to see and discuss more about different issues/problems arising with black metal-related articles. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 17:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Please i need an english mentor

Where is the site, i can look around and change a wiki mentor in english for myself ? Thanks for your answers and help - best wishes --CologneGer (talk) 15:45, 10 October 2008 (UTC)