Talk:Judge Dredd: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Split?: comment on parodies Tag: Reverted |
→Split?: r Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
::::I've just done it. (I wonder if the Parodies section is just trivia though?) [[User:Richard75|Richard75]] ([[User talk:Richard75|talk]]) 10:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC) |
::::I've just done it. (I wonder if the Parodies section is just trivia though?) [[User:Richard75|Richard75]] ([[User talk:Richard75|talk]]) 10:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC) |
||
::::: Parodies of a parody? Most of the entries look very trivial. [[User:GraemeLeggett|GraemeLeggett]] ([[User talk:GraemeLeggett|talk]]) 11:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC) |
::::: Parodies of a parody? Most of the entries look very trivial. [[User:GraemeLeggett|GraemeLeggett]] ([[User talk:GraemeLeggett|talk]]) 11:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::::Good job on the merge. And yes, I'd remove most of the "parodies" - "We put a funny name after the word 'Judge' in this one edition, and that's funny!" is mostly just trivial and certainly isn't notable. [[User:Bastun|<span style="font-family:Verdana, sans-serif">Bastun</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:Bastun|Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!]]</sup> 11:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:50, 26 October 2021
Comics: British C‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Fictional characters C‑class | |||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Judge Dredd article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Split?
Huh, what do you know... it appears this article - Judge Dredd - and Judge Dredd (character) were split, unilaterally, in December 2019, with this edit. I only noticed when the short description was changed just now. I wonder why? I mean, if Captain America, Batman and Superman can all have one main article about the character and the "franchise" (whatever that means), then Joe can get by with one article, too. Having looked at the "character" article, we wouldn't be losing anything by re-merging. Would there be any objections to a merge, or should I open a formal proposal. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:14, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- I never understood why that was done, and would support merging them. Richard75 (talk) 15:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Now that the image has been deleted from this article, because for non-free use reasons it can only be used on one article, and it's being used on the Character article, there's all the more reason to merge them again. Richard75 (talk) 09:37, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed. I'll look into the mechanics of this and proceed at the weekend, unless there are objections or someone beats me to it. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 09:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- I've just done it. (I wonder if the Parodies section is just trivia though?) Richard75 (talk) 10:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Parodies of a parody? Most of the entries look very trivial. GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Good job on the merge. And yes, I'd remove most of the "parodies" - "We put a funny name after the word 'Judge' in this one edition, and that's funny!" is mostly just trivial and certainly isn't notable. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- I've just done it. (I wonder if the Parodies section is just trivia though?) Richard75 (talk) 10:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed. I'll look into the mechanics of this and proceed at the weekend, unless there are objections or someone beats me to it. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 09:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Now that the image has been deleted from this article, because for non-free use reasons it can only be used on one article, and it's being used on the Character article, there's all the more reason to merge them again. Richard75 (talk) 09:37, 26 October 2021 (UTC)