Talk:The Man Who Saw Tomorrow: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"Predictions that became real" |
"Predictions that became real" |
||
: Shouldn't this be removed, or phrased as a possibility? This wording indicates that this is a FACT. [[User:Quase|Quase]] 07:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC) |
: Shouldn't this be removed, or phrased as a possibility? This wording indicates that this is a FACT. [[User:Quase|Quase]] 07:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
I changed the word "predictions" as "interpretations of future prophecies". Also, the title "Close predictions" was changed as "Close interpretations". I'm not sure that [[Nostradamus]] really can "saw the future", and even in this case he wrote the Propheties in a way that is impossible to call them "predictions". I think to talk about interpretations of Nostradamus' writtings is more neutral (altough we have to admit that is surprising that in the movie Welles talked about an [[Arabic]] leader that attacked [[New York]] and caused a [[world war]]). You can see the article about the French astrologist for more information. |
|||
Revision as of 14:34, 4 March 2007
"Predictions that became real"
- Shouldn't this be removed, or phrased as a possibility? This wording indicates that this is a FACT. Quase 07:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I changed the word "predictions" as "interpretations of future prophecies". Also, the title "Close predictions" was changed as "Close interpretations". I'm not sure that Nostradamus really can "saw the future", and even in this case he wrote the Propheties in a way that is impossible to call them "predictions". I think to talk about interpretations of Nostradamus' writtings is more neutral (altough we have to admit that is surprising that in the movie Welles talked about an Arabic leader that attacked New York and caused a world war). You can see the article about the French astrologist for more information.