User talk:Sardaka: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
OrphanBot (talk | contribs)
You've uploaded an untagged image
m question about copyright
Line 128: Line 128:


This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]]. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 09:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]]. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 09:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

== Copyright notice on your pictures ==
I noticed that the pictures you put on the SY article have a copyright notice in their caption. Did you mean to write that? Wikipedia doesn't accept copyrighted material, for the appropriate guidelines please read [[WP:COPYVIO]]. Thanks.[[User:TheRingess|TheRingess]] ([[User talk:TheRingess|talk]]) 13:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:19, 24 March 2007

Hello Neilrobertpaton! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dirk Beetstra T C 11:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your edits

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Moondyne 11:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the Moondyne who left me a note telling me to stop adding "inappropriate" links to Wiki? The moderator, Dirk Beetstra, said it's okay to add links to the text, especially when they are relevant to the subject. The links I have added were not spam, were not aimed at increasing search engine ratings, are not commercial and are completely relevant to the subject of the article. What's wrong with them? I'm not trying to have a fight with you, but I need to know about all this. Beetstra said it's ok to put links in the text, so what's the problem? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Neilrobertpaton (talk • contribs) 08:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC).
By "moderator", I'm guessing that you mean User:Beetstra. If so I can't see where you asked and he "said its okay" to add such links. Regardless, in my view they are inappropriate links and are not OK. For example: http://gymshots.tripod.com/gymnast1.htm. The links are commercial (ie. contain Google ads) and are not allowed per our policy on external links as Wikipedia is not a link directory. If you are keen to contribute to the encyclopaedia, and you actually own the photos, you could of course upload some of them to Wikipedia with appropriate licensing tags (see WP:TAGS). Then you can insert the images directly into the articles. In the meantime, please do not add any more links like these to Wikipedia. —Moondyne 10:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello agian. I did not say that this was the way to add the links, I asked you to consider adding content, and when the site you are adding contains information that is added, you could use it as a reference. Adding a phrase 'pictures of her can be found here' is, IMHO, not adding content, but a short and quick way to spam a link. Please read through the pages linked in the welcome-message, they provide some information regarding these subjects. Please take some attention to read WP:EL, WP:RS and WP:A, they tell a bit more about which sites provide suitable information (pictures sites hardly ever do).
I notice these pages contain a lot of pictures, you could consider uploading some pictures. Hope this helps. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 09:34, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abusive language

Please do not use abusive language as you did on Talk:Siddha Yoga, (see here). Take a look at Wikipedia:Etiquette for guidelines about how to behave on this site. Lumos3 14:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussions

Glad you found the Village Pump. If you have any concerns or ideas about the individual policies themselves, such as WP:ATT, WP:NOR or the like, you can comment on the talk pages for those policies. Glad you're interested in participating in policy and general wiki discussions. Be well! Vassyana 13:38, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikpedia is not a democracy, nor is it an anarchy. We have lots of policies but we are not a bureaucracy. While these policies may seem contradictory and overwhelming at first glance, the eight listed in the right hand side box of the list are the glue that makes the whole thing work. Before getting too involved in discussions, I strongly suggest having a read of those. And then, when you contribute to a discussion you can better appreciate other peoples points of view. —Moondyne 14:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pap-court.JPG listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Pap-court.JPG has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – riana_dzasta 12:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All the other images you downloaded for Papin sisters...

... have also been speedily deleted, for the above reason. – riana_dzasta 12:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aussies?

Sorry for the delay in replying. Yes, I'm Perth based. —Moondyne 04:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Papins1.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Papins1.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From article's talk page:

mantra paragraph

To the person who inserted the section that included the mantras: if the article makes a claim that the mantras are unique, it would be appropriate for you to add a sentence disputing the claim and then cite the book you noted. Your insertion of a long paragraph with a separate header in the midst of the research section wasn't appropriate. TimidGuy 12:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The section discussing the mantra is the appropriate location for a reference to disputes. Note also: large quotes from the book are WP:COPYVIO, unless properly referenced. It doesn't matter what language the words are written in. I would like to see the references: if this is correct, it is certainly notable. Michaelbusch 19:38, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your observations about my contribution to the TM page, but the list I provided was not a passage quoted from the book; it is a list which was in itself used at second hand by Steve Richards in his book. Nobody has copyright of that list. I am a published author and I'm quite aware of copyright law. The list is not, I can assure you, a quote from that book. As for the language, that was just my way of underlining that the mantras are not copyright by anyone. As for references, I provided enough, although I intend to add more detail about the book tomorrow.

What's your status at Wiki; are you an official or another contributor like me? Neilrobertpaton 07:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC) Wikipedia copyright policy is harder than that (see also Wikipedia:No original research and WP:CITE). Steve Richards has copyright on the text of his book. His original source has copyright on the list. Find them, cite them, and you will satisfy Wikipedia policy. And I was not the one who deleted your additions, as you can check from the article history (although, formatted as they were, they did not fit in the article). An observation: there are some very feverent supporters of TM editing the article. Unless you follow Wikipedia policy to the letter, they will remove whatever you add. Michaelbusch 17:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Fall0004.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fall0004.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Copyright notice on your pictures

I noticed that the pictures you put on the SY article have a copyright notice in their caption. Did you mean to write that? Wikipedia doesn't accept copyrighted material, for the appropriate guidelines please read WP:COPYVIO. Thanks.TheRingess (talk) 13:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]