User talk:Bhadani

Welcome to Wikindia

It is strongly recommended that users create accounts there to avoid impersonation:[1]

The woods are lovely, dark and deep. But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep. Robert Frost kindly click to drop a note Previous discussions 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 Examples Edit Summary I am trying to record some peculiar edit summaries, and to begin with I have started some specimen from User:Dbachmann's edit summaries - this shall give me many examples (of wikipedia-trivia) for my forthcoming book: [2]. --Bhadani (talk) 18:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Some examples of edit summary: huh huh was the edit summary. Was it foolish or funny? [3] just a little bit tongue-in-cheek, no? Behind the innocuous looking summary is veiled something different Hello Thanks for the hello. It is great that u are going to write a book. Best of Luck. Can u comment at the PR of Kaziranga and help me a bit with it.Amartyabag TALK2ME 04:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Sure, Amartya. It is my pleasure. --Bhadani (talk) 10:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Some help Hi, I saw your edits to issues related to Direct Action Day and would like to get your attention to a matter of serious misrepresentation: A new user named http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Teabing-Leigh has started a bunch of bullshit POV forks based on unreliable pakistani propaganda websites and afrocentric pseudohistory propaganda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gandhi%27s_racism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahomed_Ali_Jinnah%27s_11th_August_speech http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gandhi%27s_views_on_race http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_League%27s_Civil_Disobedience_Movement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_League%27s_Direct_Action_Day are both POV forks of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Action_Day Some of them have been AfD'ed, but others remain.I suggest in the strongest terms that these articles be deleted immediately. The references cited in Direct Action Day by this editor are falsely represented by him and not in the citations given (I am well-familiar with them). In contrast, he has removed numerous references that did, in fact, exist before that were reliable. In particular, this website: http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/gandhi.html cited by him across these numerous articles, Is an Afrocentric pseudohistory website with no mainstream credibility. Thanks for your attention. Kjartan8 12:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC) I thank you for your mail message. However, I think that the community of wikipedians are intelligent to understand the issues involved and over a period of time the collective efforts shall prevail to build encyclopedic contents. As such, no direct intervention is required in my opinion. --Bhadani (talk) 13:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC) copied & pasted --Bhadani (talk) 13:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC) RFA Thanks Thanks for your support on my Request for adminship, which was successful, with votes of 49/0/0. Lemme know if you need help on something I might know a little something about....(check my userpage). cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 14:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Me a Fool! Bhadani, you are a fool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snitha (talk • contribs) of 28.03.07 I am aware of that :) [4] --Bhadani (talk) 17:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Bhadani, you are a foolBold text File:Headline text