Jump to content

Paul Reiter: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Added request for help as per talk page discussion ....
Line 1: Line 1:
{{notability|Proposed|[[Wikipedia:Notability (academic)]]}}

'''Paul Reiter''' is a professor of medical entomology at the [[Pasteur Institute]] in [[Paris]], [[France]]. He is a member of the [[World Health Organization]] Expert Advisory Committee on Vector Biology and Control. He was an employee of the [[Center for Disease Control]] (Dengue Branch) for 22 years.
'''Paul Reiter''' is a professor of medical entomology at the [[Pasteur Institute]] in [[Paris]], [[France]]. He is a member of the [[World Health Organization]] Expert Advisory Committee on Vector Biology and Control. He was an employee of the [[Center for Disease Control]] (Dengue Branch) for 22 years.



Revision as of 21:09, 16 April 2007

Paul Reiter is a professor of medical entomology at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, France. He is a member of the World Health Organization Expert Advisory Committee on Vector Biology and Control. He was an employee of the Center for Disease Control (Dengue Branch) for 22 years.

Reiter is sceptical about the IPCC's views on global warming, as seen in his April 25, 2006 testimony to the United States Senate:

"A galling aspect of the debate is that this spurious 'science' is endorsed in the public forum by influential panels of 'experts.' I refer particularly to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Every five years, this UN-based organization publishes a 'consensus of the world's top scientists' on all aspects of climate change. Quite apart from the dubious process by which these scientists are selected, such consensus is the stuff of politics, not of science. Science proceeds by observation, hypothesis and experiment. The complexity of this process, and the uncertainties involved, are a major obstacle to a meaningful understanding of scientific issues by non-scientists. In reality, a genuine concern for mankind and the environment demands the inquiry, accuracy and scepticism that are intrinsic to authentic science. A public that is unaware of this is vulnerable to abuse." [1]

Paul Reiter presented Malaria in the debate on climate change and mosquito-borne disease[2] on April 25, 2006. The four primary points of his presentation here were:

  1. Malaria is not an exclusively tropical disease
  2. The transmission dynamics of the disease are complex; the interplay of climate, ecology, mosquito biology, mosquito behavior and many other factors defies simplistic analysis.
  3. It is facile to attribute current resurgence of the disease to climate change, or to use models based on temperature to “predict” future prevalence.
  4. Environmental activists use the ‘big talk’ of science to create a simple but false paradigm. Malaria specialists who protest this are generally ignored, or labelled as ‘sceptics’.

Quotes

"This claim that the IPCC is the world's top 1500 or 2500 scientists, you look at the bibliographies of the people and its simply not true. there are quite a number of non-scientists." - from The Great Global Warming Swindle

Affiliations

  • Insects and Infectious Diseases, Pasteur Institute, Paris, France
  • Member, Annapolis Center Science and Economic Advisory Board