User talk:Caledones: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DreamGuy (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{|cellpadding="10" cellspacing="4" style="background-color:#99CCFF;" width=100%
{|cellpadding="10" cellspacing="4" style="background-color:#99CCFF;" width=100%
|
|

{{AutoArchivingNotice|age=14|target=user:joshuajohnlee/Archive/archive1 {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}|dounreplied=yes|index=./Archive index|bot=Werdnabot|botlink=User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Howto}}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-14 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-user:joshuajohnlee/Archive/archive1 {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}--><!--werdnabot-index User talk:Joshuajohnlee/Archive index--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE-->


==Regarding edits made during [[November 21]] [[2006]] ([[UTC]])==
==Regarding edits made during [[November 21]] [[2006]] ([[UTC]])==

Revision as of 21:17, 27 May 2007

Regarding edits made during November 21 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Nwwaew(My talk page) 12:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Knightswood.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Knightswood.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jeremy (talk) 17:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Linking a category to a userbox

I haven't done this in a while, but I do believe that to put users of a userbox in a category, you need merely to put the userbox in that category between <includeonly> tags. Example: If you wanted a userbox to add users to Category:Wikipedians who play chess, you would edit the userbox, adding:

<includeonly>[[Category:Wikipedians who play chess|{{PAGENAME}}]]</includeonly>

(My apologies if that is unclear.) --Gray Porpoise 19:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Caledones, as a WikiProject Scotland participant, please check out this this thread and consider adding the bot results page to your watchlist so we can manually update the New Articles page. There are some false results for the first batch, but I'm sure we can collectively tune the rules to improve the output.

If we get enough people watching the results page, we'll be cooking with gas as they say :)   This looks like a great helper in finding new Scotland related material. Cheers. --Cactus.man 01:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your coaching inquiry

Replied —dgiestc 20:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful editing

You seem to have accidentally wiped out someone else's comment to me which I did not notice until now. Please be careful you don't overwrite other content while editing. —dgiestc 07:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you changed your vote on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twilight of the Dead based upon another editor's claims that being listed on Amazon and having an ISBN counts as notable. According to the notability criteria on our guideline page that is absolutely false. Please reconsider your vote. DreamGuy 04:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]