User talk:Nathanww: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:41, 9 July 2007

Welcome

Hello, Nathanww, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Chris53516 ^(Talk) 14:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. —Anas ^talk? 18:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Movement to impeach George W. Bush

A request was posted on the BLPN board related to Movement to impeach George W. Bush. I provided an answer that might help you in your mediation of the matter. The post on the BLPN board is here. Thanks for stepping forward to address this matter. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 17:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Checking in

How are things going with Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-04-25 Movement to impeach George W. Bush? Vassyana 07:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunatley, I've really been too busy to do this. Sorry. Nathanww 16:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Striking your vote

Hello Nathanww,

Thank you for your interest in the Wikimedia Board Election. The Election Committee regretfully informs you that your previous vote was received in error and will be struck according to the election rules, described below.

The Election Committee regretfully announces today that we will have to remove approximately 220 votes submitted. These votes were cast by people not entitled to vote. The election rules state that users must have at least 400 edits by June 1 to be eligible to vote.

The voter lists we sent to Software in the Public Interest (our third party election partner) initially were wrong, and one of your account was eventually included to our initial list. There was a bug in the edit counting program and the sent list contained every account with 201 or more edits, instead of 400 or more edits. So large numbers of people were qualified according to the software who shouldn't be. The bug has been fixed and an amended list was sent to SPI already.

Our first (and wrong) list contains 80,458 accounts as qualified. The proper number of qualified voters in the SPI list is now 52,750. As of the morning of July 4 (UTC), there are 2,773 unique voters and 220 people, including you, have voted who are not qualified based upon this identified error.

In accordance with voting regulations the Election Committee will strike those approximately 220 votes due to lack of voting eligibility. The list of struck votes is available at https://wikimedia.spi-inc.org/index.php/List_of_struck_votes.

We are aware of the possibility that some of the people affected may have other accounts with more than 400 edits, and hence may still be eligible to vote. We encourage you to consider voting again from another account, if you have one. If you have no other account eligible to vote, we hope you reach the criteria in the next Election, and expect to see your participation to the future Elections.

Your comments, questions or messages to the Committee would be appreciated, you can make them at m:Talk:Board elections/2007/en. Other language versions are available at m:Translation requests/Eleccom mail, 07-05.

Again, we would like to deeply apologize for any inconvenience.

Sincerely,
Kizu Naoko
Philippe
Jon Harald Søby
Newyorkbrad
Tim Starling

For Wikimedia Board Election Steering Committee

Everything was well source to reputable sources

I did not add defamatory information to Prem Rawat. Everything was well source to reputable sources. Andries 14:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop using editwarring as a way to engage in editing. You have a pending case of Mediation based on your previous inability to find compromise and stop edit warring. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 14:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will request a new mediation if my recent addition leads to yet another mini-edit war. I think I have shown a lot of willingness to compromise. Now it is the turn of others. Andries 14:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 I did not add defamatory information to [[Prem Rawat]]. Everything was well source to reputable sources. [[User:Andries|Andries]] 14:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 : You need to stop using editwarring as a way to engage in editing. You have a pending case of Mediation based on your previous inability to find compromise and stop edit warring. [[User:Jossi|≈ jossi ≈]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossi|(talk)]]</small> 14:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
+::I will request a new mediation if my recent addition leads to yet another mini-edit war. I think I have shown a lot of willingness to compromise. Now it is the turn of others. [[User:Andries|Andries]] 14:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)