User talk:Amarkov/Archive 14: Difference between revisions
Signpost delivery using AWB |
Newyorkbrad (talk | contribs) notice of arbitration case |
||
Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist|''Signpost'' spamlist]]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. [[User:Ralbot|Ralbot]] 05:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)</small> |
<small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist|''Signpost'' spamlist]]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. [[User:Ralbot|Ralbot]] 05:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)</small> |
||
==[[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey Vernon Merkey]]== |
|||
Hello, |
|||
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey Vernon Merkey]]. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey Vernon Merkey/Evidence]]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey Vernon Merkey/Workshop]]. |
|||
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] 23:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:42, 24 July 2007
[insert signature bot name] is turned off on my talk page. Feel free not to sign your comments if you don't want to.
Sorry for that undeclared Wikibreak
I was gone for a week and had no opportunity to get on and mention it. Sorry. -Amarkov moo! 02:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 27 | 2 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
censorship
if you disagree with my notion that the issue at hand is one of censorship, then simply say so. Do not presume to think your sole opinion on an issue makes it unworthy of listing. If consensus shouts me down, that's acceptable. But unilateral dismissal is not. VanTucky (talk) 05:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- But it is not a censorship issue. If anything, it's the other way around; people are reflexively saying "keep" BECAUSE it's a topic prone to censorship. The nomination cites lack of significant content and reliable sources, and you can not automatically assume that they really just want it censored. Assume good faith. -Amarkov moo! 05:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 28 | 9 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Progress in Physics
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Progress in Physics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Danko Georgiev MD 04:58, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 29 | 16 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Insanity
People who are trolled are immediately cast as martyrs, and complaints against them are dismissed as trolling. They themselves inevitably come to believe that they are thus above the rules, and will do various things that would earn an instant block, except that they are martyrs of trolling so nobody will block them.
It appears that constant allegations of a hivemind actually do have the effect of creating one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Amarkov (talk • contribs).
- The situation is a bit more complicated than that, and the person I believe you are referring to has in fact been blocked several times at different points. Newyorkbrad 23:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- It's not really anyone in particular that I refer to, but there are two people who caused me to say this. One was only ever blocked for 3RR, and the other had their only block overturned. I'm aware that the actual situation is not this simple, I just wanted to get the frustration out. I may actually reason it out and post this somewhere other than my talkpage later. -Amarkov moo! 02:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- If you do, please let me have a link. Regards, Newyorkbrad 02:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- It's not really anyone in particular that I refer to, but there are two people who caused me to say this. One was only ever blocked for 3RR, and the other had their only block overturned. I'm aware that the actual situation is not this simple, I just wanted to get the frustration out. I may actually reason it out and post this somewhere other than my talkpage later. -Amarkov moo! 02:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Gah. Now someone vandalising another user's talk page, calling them a troll, is being supported. Never mind that the person does not have a single block. A martyr called him a trolling SPA, so it must be true! -Amarkov moo! 03:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
And now I'm insane
I'm pretty sure I won't end up blocked, at least. Kinda. Well, at least I'm pretty sure it won't be upheld. Why am I doing this? -Amarkov moo! 04:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- No one's going to block you, Amarkov; you've done nothing wrong.Proabivouac 09:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
WP:PS again
Please check out this MFD. Your opinion is welcome and requested since you particiated in the original MFD. /Blaxthos 22:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
WP:POKE is doing some housecleaning
This notice is to inform you that because many people have added their names to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon#Participants but do not seem to be active, all names are being deleted in an effort to find out who is still truly interested in the project. All you have to do is re-add your name if you'd still like to be considered a member of WP:POKE. Any questions, you can contact me on my talk page. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:32, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
ED
What's your grudge with ED? Also, the mention in the Guardian was mostly about ED, and with a couple exceptyions, most of the articles mentioning Uncyclopedia are only mentions. However, I don't want to violate WP:POINT, so let's forget about that. Ratherduarm 01:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 30 | 23 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey Vernon Merkey. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey Vernon Merkey/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey Vernon Merkey/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 23:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)