User talk:Johndburger: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:21, 2 September 2007

I usually watch any talk pages I touch, so if I comment on your talk page, just respond there, so as to keep the discussion in one place. Similarly, if you initiate a discussion here, I will respond here.

ComputerWorld copy+pasting Pāṇini

Hello. Thanks for the heads-up. I have replied to your comment on Talk:Pāṇini. --ΜιĿːtalk 15:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tawkerbot2 doesn't like me! :)

Your recent edit to William Shakespeare was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 04:06, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tawkerbot2

Well, you were on a grey list for 10 min but that auto expired a while ago, no worries, you're not blacklisted now :o -- Tawker 17:36, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ego

Good move. Maybe we could try to write something on it, in relation to consciousness (I'm thinking about Nietzsche's critiques on it, that's why I was redirected to that page; see Übermensch). Else, ego does belong to the 3 words; see [[1]], although I don't know if it's really important! Cheers, Lapaz 11:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lonympics

Thanks, I reported it at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism and noted that this is a blocked user editing anonymously; I don't know if there's a better procedure. Catamorphism 15:29, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What about the dates?

Listen up, John... you may not like the way I set up the pages I go through on Wikipedia, nut it is my style... I don't think you should care if I add -st/-nd/-rd/-th to the dates that are already listed on the pages. Everybody has their own style... you have yours, I have mine...

This is a free country... we, the members of Wikimedia, can add almost anything to the pages. So, please... let me do what I do and everything will be peaceful...

Sonic Shadow 22:37, June 6th, 2006

Dates response PART II

Then I'll keep re-changing the dates over and over again... some rules I will follow, but others... I feel that I have to defy... to each their own, John...

Sonic Shadow a.k.a. D.L. Morgan 23:00, June 6th, 2006

Re: Soccer Spam

No problem, the quicker its cleaned up the better... I just happened to notice it first thats all. - Chris Lord of Haha 05:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop McDevitt

Hello, Mr. Burger. I have a friend that graduated from Bishop McDevitt, I'm surprised there's an article about it. Did you teach at the school? (This comment added by Timize · 2006-06-21 23:43:56)

No, but I went there a million years ago (1980s). When did your friend attend? I haven't added any real content to the article, I've just done a few little touchups. —johndburger 13:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This guy must have been there 3 or 4 years ago, something like that. He mentioned that you're "rather curious" on this website, as far as the school is concerned. Your name is too close.(This comment added byTimize· 2006-07-08 17:42:32)

McD II

Are you sure you're not a teacher at McDevitt? ::raises eyebrows::

Theresa Obermeyer

I don't know why you keep reverting the text on Ms. Obermeyer as that exactly describes what she is known for as a public figure as anyone who has ever lived in Alaska knows.Tom Cod 16:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep reverting? I only reverted it once—if multiple people revert your text, that might be a signal of some sort. —johndburger 12:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good job with the article, I like the changes you have made. I have a question: "Judge jails Obermeyer for 30 days: Ex-school board member's probation revoked for courthouse altercations": Do you know where I can find the text for this article you added? Is it only in print or is there some resource online where I can read it? If it's only in print then thanks anyways. I see the article text in the talk page. A talk page isn't really a realiable source though :) I can't find any adn.com articles about her before 2001. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 13:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think Tom bought the artice online, then cut and pasted it into the Talk page (which is legally problematic, of course). I'm assuming it's a reliable copy of the article, but a free, online reference would be much better. —johndburger 12:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo Parse Tree

Nice parse tree for the Buffalo buffalo, Buffalo buffalo buffalo, buffalo Buffalo buffalo article. I noticed that it is possible to add three more buffalo to the end:

Buffalo buffalo, Buffalo buffalo buffalo, buffalo Buffalo buffalo, Buffalo buffalo buffalo.

Can you add a parse tree of this new version to the article or the talk page? Synesthetic 03:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yah, see the Talk page. —johndburger 23:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New thing about the buffalo parse tree

I explained it on the buffaloetc talk page, but I'm fairly certain that what you have marked as a proper noun would actually be a proper adjective, provided I have it right and "Buffalo(capitalised) buffalo" means "New York bison." Please let me know if I've got it totally wrong, or if you want to fix it, or if you're busy and would rather I or someone else fix it. Cantras 05:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: On the talk page, they have told me I'm wrong. Neeeevermind then. Cantras 20:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Theresa Obermeyer resume photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Theresa Obermeyer resume photo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 19:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Antifeminism issues

I still contend that "anti-feminism" need not be defined as narrowly as you have—it can easily be understood to additionally mean "against the Feminist movement". —johndburger 04:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

John, I am willing to listen to any and all ideas you have here because I believe you are acting in good faith. I share some of your concerns but I am unwilling to open up a pandora's box for continued rape of the language by radical feminists. Do you have any prominent NPOV sources that use the term 'antifeminist' to describe today's antifeminists that I could look at to consider your points. One of the plusses and minuses of dictionaries is that they are slow to change which prevents blatant short-term rapes of the language but also sometimes limits definitions too. I will come back here from time to time to check in since I have no personal page. (drop in editor)128.111.95.147 03:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Great Gastby

How much did i miss? Thanks for letting me know bout the mistake too. → p00rleno (lvl 80) ←ROCKS ^C_RS 22:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Toni Collette & the Finish—Beautiful Awkward Pictures .jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Toni Collette & the Finish—Beautiful Awkward Pictures .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re Human language technology

Yep: I'm not convinced of the factual accuracy of the whole set of claims. It looks like an attempt over a number of articles to insert Bruce Wydner into a pivotal role in computing history. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Bruce Wydner. Gordonofcartoon 11:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yah—he may or may not have been the first to use the term "human language technology", but the field existed long before that. I will be working on the HLT article bit by bit. —johndburger 00:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

heroes and roaches

I removed the section, and you would've been justified to do so. There was a long discussion on the talk page about it. Might be worth reviewing if you'd like to be able to cite it for later reversions. Anyways, nice edit and summary, they let me know what to look for. ThuranX 01:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks. Nice to get some encouragement on the summary—bad or missing summaries are one of my pet peeves. —johndburger 01:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Devoninspiration

Skimming their edits, they don't seem to be actually adding any spam links, just a lot of borderline-notable authors and books. I'd just add {{notability|books}} or {{notability|biographies}} to the tops of the pages to flag them as needing better sources, or prod them for deletion if they were looking particularly bad. (There's at least one unpublished book in there which would break the WP:CRYSTAL policy, and can be prodded immediately.) --McGeddon 09:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blazing the Trail comment at User talk:Easphi

Hi John! I too noticed the string of edits adding Blazing the Trail to the reference section of many articles. Thanks for writing the nicely-worded comment at User talk:Easphi. I did notice from http://astronautics.usc.edu/faculty-staff/gruntman.htm that the author of Blazing the Trail is chair of the astronautics department at USC, so the book is presumably scholarly enough for use as an encyclopedic reference. Specifically regarding your comment about Hale, using the Amazon 'search inside' feature shows the book does mention Hale in the context of The Brick Moon, an article I have worked on in the past. In fact, although in that article I used two different primary sources showing that Hale published Brick Moon as early as he did, I didn't have a secondary source that discussed this. So in that one case at least, a reference to Blazing the Trail actually helps the scholarliness of the article. Anyway, thanks again for starting the discussion so politely on the Easphi talk page: if anything can resolve the situation smoothly, that surely was a good start! (sdsds - talk) 05:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 115: / Line 115: @@
 Skimming their edits, they don't seem to be actually adding any spam links, just a lot of borderline-notable authors and books. I'd just add <nowiki>{{notability|books}}</nowiki> or <nowiki>{{notability|biographies}}</nowiki> to the tops of the pages to flag them as needing better sources, or [[WP:PROD|prod them for deletion]] if they were looking particularly bad. (There's at least one unpublished book in there which would break the [[WP:CRYSTAL]] policy, and can be prodded immediately.) --[[User:McGeddon|McGeddon]] 09:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
+== ''Blazing the Trail'' comment at User talk:Easphi ==
+Hi John! I too noticed the string of edits adding ''Blazing the Trail'' to the reference section of many articles. Thanks for writing the nicely-worded comment at [[User talk:Easphi]]. I did notice from http://astronautics.usc.edu/faculty-staff/gruntman.htm that the author of ''Blazing the Trail'' is chair of the astronautics department at USC, so the book is presumably scholarly enough for use as an encyclopedic reference. Specifically regarding your comment about Hale, using the Amazon 'search inside' feature shows the book ''does'' mention Hale in the context of ''[[The Brick Moon]]'', an article I have worked on in the past. In fact, although in that article I used two different primary sources showing that Hale published ''Brick Moon'' as early as he did, I didn't have a secondary source that discussed this. So in that one case at least, a reference to ''Blazing the Trail'' actually helps the scholarliness of the article. Anyway, thanks again for starting the discussion so politely on the Easphi talk page: if anything can resolve the situation smoothly, that surely was a good start! ([[User:Sdsds|sdsds]] - ''[[User talk:Sdsds|talk]]'') 05:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)