User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington: Difference between revisions
drv |
→Speedy deletion: comment |
||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
Nick - please quote where exactly on [[WP:SPEEDY]] it says G7 "does not apply to encyclopedic articles with extensive references." Bishonen is correct here. The page needs to be deleted. G7 is official policy and must be respected here. Even if G7 had that in the policy (it does not), [[WP:COMMON]] and courtesy to fellow editors is also important. But policy is clear. If I'm misreading the policy, please come on the article talk page or on ANI and quote exactly where it says that about "encyclopedic articles". --[[User:Aude|Aude]] <small>([[User talk:Aude|talk]])</small> 12:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC) |
Nick - please quote where exactly on [[WP:SPEEDY]] it says G7 "does not apply to encyclopedic articles with extensive references." Bishonen is correct here. The page needs to be deleted. G7 is official policy and must be respected here. Even if G7 had that in the policy (it does not), [[WP:COMMON]] and courtesy to fellow editors is also important. But policy is clear. If I'm misreading the policy, please come on the article talk page or on ANI and quote exactly where it says that about "encyclopedic articles". --[[User:Aude|Aude]] <small>([[User talk:Aude|talk]])</small> 12:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:Wikipedia policies exist solely to aid the encyclopedia, not to be taken in a prescriptive manner. They are only descriptive. GFDL is an irrevocable form of copyright and articles are not to be deleted solely on the basis of an author's request. The only reason to delete was 'to be nice'. — [[User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<span style="color:black">Nearly Headless Nick</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|<span style="color:black; vertical-align:super; font-size:90%; font-weight:bold" title="Contributions">{C}</span>]] 16:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== DRV == |
== DRV == |
Revision as of 16:29, 18 September 2007
|
MessagesArchives: The Basement · My desk · My Barnstars ReviewRegarding your block on user:vinay412. User:kuntan is not at all related to user:vinay412. They belong to different languages namely malayalam and kannada respectively. You being indian admin, can recognise this fact by contributions i suppose. Kindly review your block on user:vinay412, who has hardly been disruptive, you may even use checkuser kuntan for confirmation. Regards. Miyamw 14:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Another IPSheesh. Special:Contributions/59.91.253.76... Does this Look familiar? I seem to remember vinay doing this before. I don't understand this one but they're obviously not happy. :p --AliceJMarkham 09:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
While we're at it...I also suspect that Ms Hooha (talk · contribs) and Prab gen (talk · contribs) may be a vinay/kuntan socks.
Ms Hooha appears to have been abandoned and Prab gen is keeping a remarkably low profile but the sequence of events is remarkably suspicious... --AliceJMarkham 11:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Why doesn't another sockpuppet account surprise me?I suspect that This is all (talk · contribs) might be a use-once-and-discard AttackSock account. Created after Lara bran's 1st unblock request was denied and half an hour before the 2nd unblock request. What a surprise. Not. :( By the way, is there somewhere else that I should be raising these issues, or is it okay to bring them here? --AliceJMarkham 14:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC) Happy Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington's Day!
SockpuppetsHello. I'm not sure if you've seen this category. I've noticed quite a few open proxies putting themselves into it (which I've removed), and there's currently a few dynamic IPs left in it. You probably know the background (and perhaps the category creator) better than me, so I leave its future to you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC) Speedy deletionNick - please quote where exactly on WP:SPEEDY it says G7 "does not apply to encyclopedic articles with extensive references." Bishonen is correct here. The page needs to be deleted. G7 is official policy and must be respected here. Even if G7 had that in the policy (it does not), WP:COMMON and courtesy to fellow editors is also important. But policy is clear. If I'm misreading the policy, please come on the article talk page or on ANI and quote exactly where it says that about "encyclopedic articles". --Aude (talk) 12:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
DRVHowdy, I've sent Origins and architecture of the Taj Mahal to deletion review. Regards, Navou banter 12:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC) |