Jump to content

User talk:Johnny Au: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 69: Line 69:
==Upgraded comments==
==Upgraded comments==
Hello. I would appreciate it if you didn't upgrade my comments or anyone else's[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:74.105.217.41&diff=155466244&oldid=155462131]. My choice of template was deliberate - there are first level user notices for a reason. User notices are also used in relation to whether the user has seen them, not how many edits they have made. Thanks. -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 17:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I would appreciate it if you didn't upgrade my comments or anyone else's[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:74.105.217.41&diff=155466244&oldid=155462131]. My choice of template was deliberate - there are first level user notices for a reason. User notices are also used in relation to whether the user has seen them, not how many edits they have made. Thanks. -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 17:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

==Toronto Star==
I didn't add my own commentary to the Toronto Star page. You're confusing the colloquial use of liberal with the academic use. You can call the Toronto Star social democratic or welfare liberal, but you cannot accurately call it liberal. I did not add personal commentary. I will continue to change it. I'm professionally trained in political thought.

Revision as of 01:18, 7 October 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Johnny Au, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 19:20, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join a WikiProject!

Hi Johnny Au,

First of all, welcome to Wikipedia. I, hereby, representing other members of WP:GHR, would want you to join our project named Golden Horseshoe Roads. (Read the article Golden Horseshoe if you don't know what it means). Click here to read our project's scope, and our participants. What we are currently doing is to create road articles, York Regional Roads and Peel Regional Roads for now. In the near future, we will be expanding our project, so that the scope includes creating articles of, not just roads, but communities, landmarks, and structures around the Golden Horseshoe. I have reviewed your contributions, and find you have a great potential.

If you do want to join the project, and we hope so you do, please inform me, and I will tell you what to do next.

 Smcafirst | Chit-Chat  posted at 21:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Golden Horseshoe Roads, Outreach Department

WikiProject Template

Hi again, it's me, Smcafirst.

Well, I added {{Golden Horseshoe Roads}} on your user page, so we will know you are one of our member. Okay?

 Smcafirst | Chit-Chat  posted at 20:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Golden Horseshoe Roads

WP:GHR issues

Hi Johnny Au,

As part of our WP:GHR campaign, from now on, every article you create/edit/view that is related to our porject's scope, please add the template {{Component Golden Horseshoe Roads}}, and notify me, and then I will rate that particular article. It is also a nice idea to start putting this template in articles where landmarks are introduced. (i.e. Splendid China Tower??) We will be expanding our project soon enough, so that everything in the Golden Horseshoe will be covered.

Thanks for joining!

 Smcafirst | Chit-Chat  posted at 21:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GHR Update

Enclosed is a map of census divisions (so, counties/ regions / cities), and colour coded to show how are we doing in different parts of the Golden Horseshoe, and how much articles are written. Over the summer, I will create another similar one. The white parts of the map means that we will start to work on these areas, after the expansion of the project. (So, that is, after the creation of WP:QCWC (WikiProject Quebec City-Windsor Corridor).

Smcafirst 19:24, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Horseshoe Sources

My source is the article for Guelph, Ontario where it says the Metro population is 200,425. Looking at the articles for other cities on the list such as Barrie, Toronto, and Hamilton, the metro populations are the exact same as the ones used on the golden horseshoe article. There is also a source for this information in the first paragraph of the Guelph article. If we need sources on both the Guelph and Golden Horseshoe pages for the same information, let me know and I will gladly put the source into that article as well. I just don't understand why all the other cities have metro numbers listed but Guelph uses a city proper number. Thanks for your input. --71.199.196.64 05:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have been a member of wikipedia for some time now and you can see my contributions under the user name Barinade2151. --71.199.196.64 05:29, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. 199.64.0.252 20:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Toronto Meetup


TORONTO MEETUP NOTICE

Hello Johnny Au,

I saw you name on the Wikiproject Toronto page and I would like to inform you about a Wiki Meetup that is being organized. If you are interested, feel free to add your input on the Toronto Meetup talk page.

Regards,

Nat Tang ta | co | em

Upgraded comments

Hello. I would appreciate it if you didn't upgrade my comments or anyone else's[1]. My choice of template was deliberate - there are first level user notices for a reason. User notices are also used in relation to whether the user has seen them, not how many edits they have made. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto Star

I didn't add my own commentary to the Toronto Star page. You're confusing the colloquial use of liberal with the academic use. You can call the Toronto Star social democratic or welfare liberal, but you cannot accurately call it liberal. I did not add personal commentary. I will continue to change it. I'm professionally trained in political thought.