Talk:Imaginationland Episode II

Isent this called Imaginationland Part 2 not episode 2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.243.251 (talk) 12:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, as far as we know, the episode is called "Inaginationland Episode II". The Chronic 14:55, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Go to the episode guide at southparkstudios.com. The title is correct.--Swellman 16:13, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Lists

Before a list of nightmare creatures gets started, can be PLEASE discuss the issue of placing the list? I don't want to see the same issue from the first episode on here. Douglasr007 02:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

I think we should place it at the bottom, and slightly off-center to give the article a dynamic look that the reader will find subconsciously unsettling, as befits the "evil" theme of the episode. Captain Infinity 02:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

No, I'm talking about a list shouldn't be made on here until an agreement in made if a list of characters that appear for a less than a minute fall under notability guidelines. It's obviously notable to mention Freddy, Predator, Alien, and the Woodland Critters. Douglasr007 02:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps there should be two lists - one for the imaginary "good guys" and one for the villains. Aasartor 03:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Merge?

• Don't Merge. Who has suggested merging? I see the tag, but no one has made the suggestion. It's a silly suggestion in any case: separate episodes deserve separate articles. Captain Infinity 02:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

• Don't merge. Per Captain Infinity's reasoning. — PyTom (talk) 02:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

• Don't Merge. These are two completely different episodes. Why would someone merge them? Although Trey Parker and Matt Stone said that they wanted it to be a movie, just make another page titled The South Park Triology: Kyle Sucks Cartman's Balls and merge them all there. But leave these individual episodes alone. There is absolutly no point in merging the two episodes. - Dude7324 09:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Don't merge per all of the above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.34.217.222 (talk) 02:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
• Don't merge because each individual episode of South Park deserves its own page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.121.27.2 (talk) 02:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
• Don't mergeBecause the idea is almost as silly as a talking towel, and just as useful. Seriously, wait until all three episodes have aired, create a semi-duplicate entry for the episode as a whole (call it "Imaginationland Trilology" or whatever) and do it that way. If you're going to start arguing semantics like this, you may as well go ahead and build a time machine to go back to last week where you can ask Matt and Trey if this deserves a single entry on Wikipedia or one for all three episodes. --Iwriteu 03:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Kyle's death scene

Anyone know if this is the same scene as the one in Abyss? --68.209.227.3 02:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

That's exactly what I was reminded of, too. Anyone know if Cartman is saying the same lines?NiGHTS into Dreams... 02:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Don't know but it kinda reminded me of one scene on Lost too. Don't now if it deserves to be mentioned tho (when Jack tries to bring back Charlie...)

work on the plot for now, then go to the cultural references

--68.9.193.246 02:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Isn't it obvious by now (SPOILER?)

Kyle will never suck Cartman's balls because the contract is null and void. The contract is null and void because Cartman had to prove that a leprechaun was REAL. A leprechaun, at least in this case, was not real, it was by technical definition imaginary. I simply can not see this plotline stretching out in episode three. I "imagine" that they'll focus on Stan falling (back) into Imaginationland and teaming up with Butters somehow to fix everything back to the way it was; possibly by imagining it that way. --166.102.104.42 03:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Evil Imaginary Character: Man in the Golden Armor

Can anyone tell me who the evil imaginary character in the golden armor is? It looks like some greek god or something. I know I've seen him before, and I just can't remember what movie/tv series/book he's supposed to be from. It's driving me nuts... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.252.188.22 (talk) 03:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

From Saint Seiya I believe, the man in the golden armor is the warrior of Leo or something like that.

Think it is a character from Excalibur (film) this one. [1]▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡^Talk 04:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Previously on Battlestar Galatica

Is it possible that this is a oxymoron? In the episode 4th Grade, the nerds argue over if there was ever a two-parter in Battlestar Galatica, coming to the conclusion that there was not. So I am not arguing the dramatic effect that it is common in dramas, just that it is specifically a show that does not have "previously on *****"? 143.195.150.63

"Every night the dream is the same"

What movie/tv show is this from? Its really bothering me that I cant remember. Is it terminator 3? Iownatv 04:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Final Scene of Episode 2

The way that Cartman in his regal getup rises up besides Kyle in the bed, doesn't that seem like an allusion to a Burger King commercial?--70.253.203.15 06:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)