User talk:Moondyne: Difference between revisions
MJC Thanks and query |
YellowMonkey (talk | contribs) Bill Lawry |
||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
Thank you for the image of Crawley Bay (14 Nov 2007) |
Thank you for the image of Crawley Bay (14 Nov 2007) |
||
The article on the Harvey River mentions 'Captain Mark Collie' and links to 'Mark John Currie'. Should it refer and link to Dr 'Alexander Collie'? [[User:Apuldram|Apuldram]] ([[User talk:Apuldram|talk]]) 15:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC) |
The article on the Harvey River mentions 'Captain Mark Collie' and links to 'Mark John Currie'. Should it refer and link to Dr 'Alexander Collie'? [[User:Apuldram|Apuldram]] ([[User talk:Apuldram|talk]]) 15:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
== [[Bill Lawry]] == |
|||
Hi there Moondyne. We still use caps for Fifth and Sixth Tests I think. Also, if you have a spare minute can you take a look at [[Arthur Morris]]? I have had a few complaints at FAC from two American reviewers who think that the article is a bit too technical.. I'm not sure how to act on that one though, unless I engage in hyperbole (not good, obviously), '''[[User:Blnguyen|<font color="GoldenRod">Blnguyen</font>]]''' (''[[User talk:Blnguyen|<font color="#FA8605">bananabucket</font>]]'') 04:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:17, 21 November 2007
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Micro/macro
It seems that Apollo is continuing to revert to microeconomic only, he is unable to accept including both micro and macro, and from his insistance on this single version and accepting no compromises, I think he is going to continue to insist on his specific version. I would appreciate some authority to be used with his continual reverts with absolutely no compromise taken on board from me, or offered by him. Timeshift 06:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I haven't broken 3RR, and he has. But thankyou anyway for the warning. Timeshift 06:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- I don't care whether you have or haven't to the letter of 3RR. What is happening is disruptive editing and that will earn a block regardless. —Moondyne 07:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm the one making all the concessions. He is insisting on one version and one version only. And has broken 3RR. Sigh. Timeshift 07:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- I don't care whether you have or haven't to the letter of 3RR. What is happening is disruptive editing and that will earn a block regardless. —Moondyne 07:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Have pity
on a poor wikistalker and link to your new articles in your /Contributions diffs. Currently, if I see something that interests me, I have to examine the diff, find the link on the page, and click on it. (But credit where credit is due: at least you name the article; Cas's edit summary is invariably "another".) Hesperian 07:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- For you, I will try harder. At least someone is watching... Although, as the stalkee it is my duty to make you do a bit of work. —Moondyne 07:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
DYK
--Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of international cricketers called for throwing
List of international cricketers called for throwing, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of international cricketers called for throwing satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricketers called for throwing and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of international cricketers called for throwing during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 22:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 47 | 19 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
=Mark John Currie
Thank you for the image of Crawley Bay (14 Nov 2007) The article on the Harvey River mentions 'Captain Mark Collie' and links to 'Mark John Currie'. Should it refer and link to Dr 'Alexander Collie'? Apuldram (talk) 15:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there Moondyne. We still use caps for Fifth and Sixth Tests I think. Also, if you have a spare minute can you take a look at Arthur Morris? I have had a few complaints at FAC from two American reviewers who think that the article is a bit too technical.. I'm not sure how to act on that one though, unless I engage in hyperbole (not good, obviously), Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC)