Talk:Mold gold cape: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
comments |
→Copy vio issues: new section |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Comments== |
==Comments== |
||
Interesting article but I wonder if it could be more extensively [[WP:Wikify|wikified]]. Also, following [[User:Wetman|Wetman]]'s comments, the refs could do with some work (i.e. use inline citations) else it's hard to establish what (if anything) is [[WP:OR|Original Research]]. [[User:Rjgibb|Dick G]] ([[User talk:Rjgibb|talk]]) 03:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
Interesting article but I wonder if it could be more extensively [[WP:Wikify|wikified]]. Also, following [[User:Wetman|Wetman]]'s comments, the refs could do with some work (i.e. use inline citations) else it's hard to establish what (if anything) is [[WP:OR|Original Research]]. [[User:Rjgibb|Dick G]] ([[User talk:Rjgibb|talk]]) 03:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Copy vio issues == |
|||
The article is ripping off parts of the British Museum's article on the cape; rewrite is needed in affected sections. [[User:Zidel333|Zidel333]] ([[User talk:Zidel333|talk]]) 20:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:14, 12 December 2007
Archaeology Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Wales Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Visual arts Unassessed | |||||||
|
A fact from Mold gold cape appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 December 2007 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/December. |
Symbolism
- "it involves symbolism not seen in Wessex". This is unnecessarily mysterious. What symbolism?
- "It parallels the early Rongères bowl, drawing itself from Central European sources although found in eastern France, but also with the lenticular boss found on the Migdale 'spacer-plate' and the Melfort, Argyll bronze armlets." These objects are not as familiar as the Mona Lisa. "Parallels" is too general to convey information.
(The footnotes aren't working: the easiest system to use is <ref></ref>.) --Wetman (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Comments
Interesting article but I wonder if it could be more extensively wikified. Also, following Wetman's comments, the refs could do with some work (i.e. use inline citations) else it's hard to establish what (if anything) is Original Research. Dick G (talk) 03:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Copy vio issues
The article is ripping off parts of the British Museum's article on the cape; rewrite is needed in affected sections. Zidel333 (talk) 20:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC)