User talk:LAX: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:38, 1 February 2008

LAX

"I reject your edits and substitute my own." | Talk Page ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ) | Contributions ( edit count )

WARNING: If I leave a comment on your talkpage, I'll reply there. If you leave a comment on my talkpage, I'll reply here. L A X

Click here to start a new discussion
Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==.

Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3
Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

Armageddon

Alright, maybe we can ask Matt to do it, since I also want to start working on Armageddon. Are we writing everything in separate sanboxes or.... -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, just wanted to know where it was going to be written. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now. You? Or are you going to celebrate your Adminship? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm looking at the matches and yeah that's about it. So, yeah. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can you do me a favor and delete both images, as they have already been replaced with other ones. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I really appreciate it. ;) Hey, was Armageddon a PPV for both Raw and SmackDown!? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are we going to add a table to the article? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, wasn't Armageddon 2002 a PPV between Raw and SmackDown!? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Raw and SmackDown! sharing the same PPV, as they've done with WrestleMania and SummerSlam. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

True about that. How are the feuds coming in? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just checkin'. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I wouldn't mind in helping getting SummerSlam '07 to GA status. ;) We can probably do that in between. What do you think? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oofa, the article has a lot of refs. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for that, we can work together and get the article to GA status. We will need opinions by others. Sorry if I'm taking too long to answer; I'm sort of watching the Democratic debate. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting SS 07 to GA isnt the right move, getting it to FA is the right move =). IT is well sourced and well written. Did you take part in writing it?--TrU Co ⁹31¹ 01:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we got Truco's POV. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I just reminded Truco that Lex did that for New Years Revolution and it failed. We should do the GA first. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

True. Maybe after we get SummerSlam to GA, we can probably work on Survivor Series or after we're done with Armageddon to GA status. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. It will take time (especially the nomination process, if you know what I mean [NWO 04]) TrU Co ⁹31¹ 02:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course and we can probably work on our PPV's to get them there. And yeah, I would say to wait, since I nominated Unforgiven '04 to the GA-list and there hasn't been no progress. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well NWO is like in the top 15 or 20 on the GA list, so it should get reviewed soon. So did you pass your RfA?TrU Co ⁹31¹ 02:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm down with everything. Man, are we going to be busy. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Man absolutely. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Im Not Worthy *Im Not Worthy..lol (Bow Down To The King)TrU Co ⁹31¹ 02:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HAHA...yea that way we can have more GA articles credited to the Kliq and ourselves.--TrU Co ⁹31¹ 02:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 ::::Man absolutely. ;) --<span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User:ThinkBlue|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:White"> &nbsp;ThinkBlue&nbsp;</span>''']] </span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User_talk:ThinkBlue|(Hit]]</span> <span style="font-family:Times New Roman">[[User:ThinkBlue/Autograph book|'''BLUE''')]]</span> 02:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 :::*Im Not Worthy *Im Not Worthy..lol ([[Triple H|Bow Down To The King]])'''''[[User:Truco9311|<font color="black">T</font><font color="blue">r</font><font color="black">U</font>]][[User talk:Truco9311|<font color="blue">C</font><font color="Black">o</font>]][[User:Truco9311/Guestbook|<sup><font color="black">9</font></sup><small><font color="blue">31</font></small><sup><font color="black">1</font></sup>]]''''' 02:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
+:HAHA...yea that way we can have more GA articles credited to the Kliq and ourselves.--'''''[[User:Truco9311|<font color="black">T</font><font color="blue">r</font><font color="black">U</font>]][[User talk:Truco9311|<font color="blue">C</font><font color="Black">o</font>]][[User:Truco9311/Guestbook|<sup><font color="black">9</font></sup><small><font color="blue">31</font></small><sup><font color="black">1</font></sup>]]''''' 02:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)