User talk:63.89.177.229: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 28: Line 28:
***Kralizec! and Oli Filth agreed that "as this is an anonymous IP talk page, it belongs to the Wikimedia Foundation." You cannot own what you have not logged into, otherwise there would be no accountability. [[Help:Logging_in#Why_log_in.3F|Why log in?]] "You will have your own... user talk page". That's how I read it anyway. [[User:Colfer2|Colfer2]] ([[User talk:Colfer2|talk]]) 02:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
***Kralizec! and Oli Filth agreed that "as this is an anonymous IP talk page, it belongs to the Wikimedia Foundation." You cannot own what you have not logged into, otherwise there would be no accountability. [[Help:Logging_in#Why_log_in.3F|Why log in?]] "You will have your own... user talk page". That's how I read it anyway. [[User:Colfer2|Colfer2]] ([[User talk:Colfer2|talk]]) 02:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
::::To elaborate on what ''Colfer2'' wrote, [[WP:USER]] is the Wikipedia guideline that gives editors the right to remove comments -at will- from their own talk pages. If you review the guideline, you may note that it only refers to registered editors, with no mention of "anonymous" users or unregistered "IP" address editors. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 02:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
::::To elaborate on what ''Colfer2'' wrote, [[WP:USER]] is the Wikipedia guideline that gives editors the right to remove comments -at will- from their own talk pages. If you review the guideline, you may note that it only refers to registered editors, with no mention of "anonymous" users or unregistered "IP" address editors. --[[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 02:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
:::::However, the page actually goes further to say you are even less anonymous using an unregistered account. Where does it say unregistered IP address editors may not remove comments? A policy should state for or against. Lack of policy does not make policy.
:::::Where does it say unregistered IP address editors may not remove comments? A policy should state for or against. Lack of policy does not make policy.

Revision as of 03:09, 6 March 2008

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

February 2008

  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bluetooth, you will be blocked from editing. Oli Filth(talk) 16:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
  2. This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bluetooth, you will be blocked from editing. Oli Filth(talk) 16:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 16:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  • User also blanked his/her own user/talk page, several times, twice after the above block was added. This page itself. Colfer2 (talk) 17:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued disruptive editing and talk page abuse [1].. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 20:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

  • User blanked his/her own Talk page (this page). Anonymous users are not allowed to do that, see discussion above. Colfer2 (talk) 21:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Discussion above does not reference where a single IP cannot own its own IPs user page. Admin failed to cite this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:USER does not actually detail his claim, nor does the registered link. Show me where in the User policy or otherwise that details that the same IP address cannot clear its own user page.
      • Kralizec! and Oli Filth agreed that "as this is an anonymous IP talk page, it belongs to the Wikimedia Foundation." You cannot own what you have not logged into, otherwise there would be no accountability. Why log in? "You will have your own... user talk page". That's how I read it anyway. Colfer2 (talk) 02:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To elaborate on what Colfer2 wrote, WP:USER is the Wikipedia guideline that gives editors the right to remove comments -at will- from their own talk pages. If you review the guideline, you may note that it only refers to registered editors, with no mention of "anonymous" users or unregistered "IP" address editors. --Kralizec! (talk) 02:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where does it say unregistered IP address editors may not remove comments? A policy should state for or against. Lack of policy does not make policy.