Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colonel Kill Motherfuckers: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:15, 1 May 2008

Colonel Kill Motherfuckers

Non-notable film that has a distinct lack of multiple non-trivial sources. Reading through the google hits for an hour or so, I had a very difficult time finding any source on the movie that wasn't either a blog, you-tube, or self-promotional. Trusilver 20:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also note that this article was given a prod tag ten days or so ago but it was removed by the article's author. Trusilver 20:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete According to above. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ ^{Drop me a line}§ 21:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sounds like a fun movie, though. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. I don't understand the justification for a speedy close here, but a regular delete would be fine. Terraxos (talk) 00:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get that either, I have sent a message to the editor asking for him to elaborate on his position. Trusilver 01:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, see the Myspace test. Stifle (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm really frustrated by this and don't know how else to prove a film that should be fine by it's own merit and the information I have already supplied. Here are the only other things I can think of: 1) Hack Movies has been touted by celebrities including Lloyd Kaufman and Monique Dupree. 2) (I realize I'm being vain here but...) I have appeared in numerous films and have also worked in the casting department for films and television shows including The Real World. See my IMDB page for proof. I hope this helps. If not, I will try my best to come up with more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erkman27 (talk • contribs) 22:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *'''Delete''', see [[User:Stifle/Myspace test|the Myspace test]]. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle/wizard|talk]]) 20:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 *<small>'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film|list of Film-related deletion discussions]].  </small> <small>-- [[User:Fabrictramp|Fabrictramp]] ([[User talk:Fabrictramp|talk]]) 23:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)</small>
-*'''Keep''' I'm really frustrated by this and don't know how else to prove a film that should be fine by it's own merit and the information I have already supplied. Here are the only other things I can think of: 1) Hack Movies has been touted by celebrities including [http://youtube.com/watch?v=9pgLyhuO5gE Lloyd Kaufman] and [[Monique Dupree]]. 2) (I realize I'm being vain here but...) I have appeared in numerous films and have also worked in the casting department for films and television shows including [[The Real World]]. See my [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2269943 IMDB page] for proof. I hope this helps. If not, I will try my best to come up with more.
+*'''Keep''' I'm really frustrated by this and don't know how else to prove a film that should be fine by it's own merit and the information I have already supplied. Here are the only other things I can think of: 1) Hack Movies has been touted by celebrities including [http://youtube.com/watch?v=9pgLyhuO5gE Lloyd Kaufman] and [[Monique Dupree]]. 2) (I realize I'm being vain here but...) I have appeared in numerous films and have also worked in the casting department for films and television shows including [[The Real World]]. See my [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2269943 IMDB page] for proof. I hope this helps. If not, I will try my best to come up with more.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Erkman27|Erkman27]] ([[User talk:Erkman27|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Erkman27|contribs]]) 22:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->