User talk:Justinm1978: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 64: Line 64:


[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Delta_Sigma_Theta&diff=next&oldid=228028913 Instead of blindly reverting people's edits], please look at the edit history and [[WP:AGF|AGF]], because the IP did make some constructive edits. '''[[User:Miranda|<font face="verdana"><font color="#007BA7">miranda</font></font>]]''' 16:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Delta_Sigma_Theta&diff=next&oldid=228028913 Instead of blindly reverting people's edits], please look at the edit history and [[WP:AGF|AGF]], because the IP did make some constructive edits. '''[[User:Miranda|<font face="verdana"><font color="#007BA7">miranda</font></font>]]''' 16:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
:That's a bit of a trivial thing to bring to my attention. Instead of bothering an editor who you have no respect for, please assume some good faith yourself before chastising me for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Delta_Sigma_Theta&diff=228031976&oldid=228029116 missing a very minor error], which you have now corrected Thanks! :) [[User:Justinm1978|Justinm1978]] ([[User talk:Justinm1978#top|talk]]) 17:29, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:29, 26 July 2008

My turn on the DST monitoring, I guess.

I'll try to keep an eye out.Naraht (talk) 03:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it, thank you! :) Justinm1978 (talk) 03:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read my comment. Shalom (HelloPeace) 04:17, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Omega Phi Gamma Discussion

I agree. Thanks for all of your help and the constructive edits that you have made to the article. Victor8698 (talk) 03:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anon

I was thinking the same thing. Badagnani (talk) 02:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of referenced statement from Toyota Prius article

Hi Justinm1978, I assume that you made this edit by mistake, judging by the associated summary comment ("This information is suspect, provide a reference"). If you look again, you will see that I had added a more specific reference for the statement, which you just removed, along with the statement. Perhaps you could undo your own edit, adding an appropriate summary.

Incidentally, why did you think that the information was "suspect"?

For your information, here are the eight cars, with their official UK "combined" fuel consumption and references.

Model Combined imperial mpg Reference
SEAT Ibiza 1.4 TDI 80PS Ecomotion Template:Mpg (Imperial) [1]
Volkswagen Polo 3/5 Door 1.4 TDI (80 PS) Bluemotion Template:Mpg (Imperial) [2]
MINI Cooper D Template:Mpg (Imperial) [3]
Citroën C1 1.4HDi Template:Mpg (Imperial) [4]
MINI Cooper D Clubman Template:Mpg (Imperial) [5]
Škoda Fabia 1.4 TDI 80PS Green-Line Template:Mpg (Imperial) [6]
Škoda Fabia Estate 1.4 TDI PD 80PS Template:Mpg (Imperial) [7]
Fiat 500 1.3 16v MultiJet Template:Mpg (Imperial) [8]
Toyota Prius 1.5 VVT-i Hybrid Template:Mpg (Imperial) [9]

Best regards, -- de Facto (talk). 15:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting other people's edits

Instead of blindly reverting people's edits, please look at the edit history and AGF, because the IP did make some constructive edits. miranda 16:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a bit of a trivial thing to bring to my attention. Instead of bothering an editor who you have no respect for, please assume some good faith yourself before chastising me for missing a very minor error, which you have now corrected Thanks! :) Justinm1978 (talk) 17:29, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]