Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nailin' Paylin: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:45, 11 October 2008

Nailin' Paylin

Non-notable product. If there's a CSD category that this falls under I would have marked it that way. However, I couldn't identify one. Deadly∀ssassin 22:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 22:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Delete for now. If it is indeed produced by Hustler, a notable publisher, then it may come to meet the notability criteria after its publication. For now, however, as the film has not even finished shooting, and the only source is a blog, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball would seem to apply. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, there's more than just a blog as a source. But delete for the moment anyway as we're neither a newspaper nor a crystall ball and not every bad joke which gets a a little press for a couple of days has long term notability. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 22:52, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a crystall ball and even if this is released there's no indication it will be notable. Edward321 (talk) 23:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - That's just too many google news hits. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 05:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete according to the article it is in "pre-production" which means it doesn't meet the future films criteria. wikipedia is NOT a news or gossip site and we shouldn't be operating as one. Jasynnash2 (talk) 11:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just way too many independent reliable sources about the subject that is the basis of WP:N. I look at notnews and don't think this is routine coverage of tabloid journalism. If it was just TMZ and People that was reporting on this, then sure but not when mainstream newspapers are involved. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is not gossip or just blogs, this is an actual movie being made, that has many sources talking about it. To say that it should be deleted because it isn't made yet it ridiculous. Their are tons of articles about upcoming movies on this site. Also this is important, as it shows how big this election is and the people surrounding it. Palin is big in the news, and people want to hear things that have to do with her, and this will be a much viewed article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam Wanamaker (talk • contribs) 23:22, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think we all agree that Sarah Palin is notable. That doesn't automatically make this in-production film notable, however. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:14, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. As per Fisherqueen's statements. --Juansidious (talk) 23:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment/Neutral this movie is lame for not picking a better lookalike for palin. I agree this movie exists and will be produced. WP:FILM suggests that an article can probably not be written before principle filming (which is scheduled to start today) and this is clearly not a WP:CRYSTAL issue. The sourcing it pretty weak gruel, with the most august of the bunch being the new york daily news...But we really honestly do have to prepare ourselves for the eventuality that there will be an article on this subject when the film is released. So I'm on the fence. Protonk (talk) 17:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 **'''Comment'''  I think we all agree that [[Sarah Palin]] is notable.  That doesn't automatically make this in-production film notable, however.  -[[User:FisherQueen|FisherQueen]]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> ([[User talk:FisherQueen|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/FisherQueen|contribs]])</span> 01:14, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Delete for now'''. As per Fisherqueen's statements. --[[User:Juansidious|Juansidious]] ([[User talk:Juansidious|talk]]) 23:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Comment/Neutral''' this movie is lame for not picking a better lookalike for palin.  I agree this movie exists and will be produced.  [[WP:FILM]] suggests that an article can probably not be written before principle filming (which is scheduled to start today) and this is clearly not a [[WP:CRYSTAL]] issue.  The [http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&tab=wn&ned=&q=%22Nailin%27+Paylin%22&btnG=Search+News sourcing] it pretty weak gruel, with the most ''august'' of the bunch being the new york daily news...But we really honestly '''do''' have to prepare ourselves for the eventuality that there will be an article on this subject when the film is released.  So I'm on the fence. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 17:45, 11 October 2008 (UTC)