Talk:Mambo (software): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
[[User:Elamic|El Mariachi?]] 13:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
[[User:Elamic|El Mariachi?]] 13:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
[[User:213.22.126.100|213.22.126.100]] 15:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
This article has been used as a promotion point for other sites not affiliated with the mambo foundation. |
This article has been used as a promotion point for other sites not affiliated with the mambo foundation. |
||
It has also been serving as a a notice board for controversy surrounding the project. |
It has also been serving as a a notice board for controversy surrounding the project. |
||
Revision as of 15:03, 12 July 2006
Forgive me, but isn't JWebWizard Mambo Development Services just link spam?
-[Unknown] 16:51, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Perhaps not exactly spam but the article is basically just a list of lists. So I moved them to the Wikibook but it even might be an idea to delete them alltogether as this kind of information is there already on the specialised Mambo pages. The feature list should be structured and some of the obvious features removed. The version information has been deleted as this is something constantly changing and people better consult the web site. Hirzel 2 July 2005 10:04 (UTC)
 | This article was nominated for deletion on September 1, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
— JIP | Talk 07:17, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
Revert issues regarding Mambo
It seems numerous people have been reverting edits regarding the Mambo Foundation issues seen on this CMS for the last month or so.
The text in question currently being reverted is:
It is currently in a strategic alliance with Ansearch Ltd after the attempted sale of the Mambo forums fell through. This remains a developing event.
As I don't want to fall foul of the 3RR rule in order to stop verifiable data from being removed from the Wiki, I'd ask either those who maintain 202.169.242.124 as to why verifiable data on Mambo Communities should be removed ? There also seems minor POV pushing in that in an ordered list of forks by release date, the latest one, Joomla! always gets put last. If there is a new fork on the market out of Mambo, something else will take precedence over Joomla, but this just seems like blatant POV pushing.
Notwithstanding that, it seems other people have fallen foul of some revert issues with 202.169.241.3 also removing bits of verifiable content related to the Mambo project ?
Perhaps it would be wise just to put a vandalism lock on the entire page
El Mariachi? 13:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
213.22.126.100 15:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC) This article has been used as a promotion point for other sites not affiliated with the mambo foundation. It has also been serving as a a notice board for controversy surrounding the project. Sections and links not related to mambo software or the mambo foundation have been removed. None of those entries would qualify as objective information about the project.