User talk:207.88.204.11: Difference between revisions
m please explain |
m Reproach about edit to The Adventures of Tintin |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Tintin== |
|||
Your edit to [[the adventures of Tintin]] was surely not worth making: there is very little difference between an '''and''' or a '''&''' |
|||
What is it with Bozo the "fictional" clown? In a way all clowns are fiction, in the sense that they don't "exist" as real people. The category makes sense if it sticks to clowns that never existed as flesh-and-blood entities but were only depicted in fictional works (e.g., Krusty), but that's not the case with this Bozo, who's just as real as any clown. - DavidWBrooks 21:41, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
What is it with Bozo the "fictional" clown? In a way all clowns are fiction, in the sense that they don't "exist" as real people. The category makes sense if it sticks to clowns that never existed as flesh-and-blood entities but were only depicted in fictional works (e.g., Krusty), but that's not the case with this Bozo, who's just as real as any clown. - DavidWBrooks 21:41, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 17:25, 15 October 2004
Tintin
Your edit to the adventures of Tintin was surely not worth making: there is very little difference between an and or a & What is it with Bozo the "fictional" clown? In a way all clowns are fiction, in the sense that they don't "exist" as real people. The category makes sense if it sticks to clowns that never existed as flesh-and-blood entities but were only depicted in fictional works (e.g., Krusty), but that's not the case with this Bozo, who's just as real as any clown. - DavidWBrooks 21:41, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you have a tendency to write things like this:
- actor; Some Actor
or more generally:
- [occupation]; Name in Italics
which is rather odd; it's quite ungrammatical to separate someone's occupation from their name with a semicolon, and it's against Wikipedia's manual of style to italicize every name. Could you explain please? —No-One Jones (m) 18:07, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Hello? Could you please explain this continued addition of highly unorthodox punctuation and formatting? —No-One Jones (m) 16:30, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)