Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Graffiti/archive2: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ultra-Loser (talk | contribs) →[[Graffiti]]: reply |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Comment''' Thank you, but I see an evidence of {{[[fact]]}} tags at the bottom. Would you mind fixing that?--[[User:Rmky87|Rmky87]] 15:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' Thank you, but I see an evidence of {{[[fact]]}} tags at the bottom. Would you mind fixing that?--[[User:Rmky87|Rmky87]] 15:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Sorry about the passive-aggressiveness, but seriously, this needs to be taken care of, and why is the {{[[Template:Citation style|citation style]]}} template still there?--[[User:Rmky87|Rmky87]] 21:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC) |
:Sorry about the passive-aggressiveness, but seriously, this needs to be taken care of, and why is the {{[[Template:Citation style|citation style]]}} template still there?--[[User:Rmky87|Rmky87]] 21:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
::Thanks, the citation template has been removed, but where is this aforementioned {{fact}} tag? I can't seem to find it. <b>[[User:Ultra-Loser|<span style="color:#112B84">Ultra-Loser</span>]]</b> <small>[[User_talk:Ultra-Loser|Talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Ultra-Loser|Contributions]]</small> 00:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:26, 18 October 2006
Graffiti
Self Nomination
Hi everyone,
I came accross this article a little while ago and, after learning that it's a former featured article, I decided to restore it to its former glory. I rewrote it, added refs etc., and it's just gone through peer review. I think that this would a good featered article because it's well-written, covers an important topic, and has lots of useful information on it. What do you guys think? Thanks,
Ultra-Loser Talk / Contributions 06:53, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you, but I see an evidence of {{fact}} tags at the bottom. Would you mind fixing that?--Rmky87 15:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry about the passive-aggressiveness, but seriously, this needs to be taken care of, and why is the {{citation style}} template still there?--Rmky87 21:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, the citation template has been removed, but where is this aforementioned [citation needed] tag? I can't seem to find it. Ultra-Loser Talk / Contributions 00:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)