Talk:Computer architecture: Difference between revisions
Guy Harris (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
That is, treating microarchitecture as a part of architecture looks misleading. At least to the average person like me. |
That is, treating microarchitecture as a part of architecture looks misleading. At least to the average person like me. |
||
:When the lecturer refers to "big-A architecture", he's referring to the instruction set architecture. Microarchitecture (subcategory 2), like instruction set architecture (subcategory 1), is a part of the topic of computer architecture. [[User:Guy Harris|Guy Harris]] ([[User talk:Guy Harris|talk]]) 19:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:46, 31 December 2019
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment 1
I'm worried about this page and a few others (one that I revised already) that 216.237.32.xxx has entered in today. They are suspiciously too good and comprehensive. I'm sure they are copied from somewhere, but I couldn't find them with a search engine. -- ansible
- I'm -very- flattered. However, it's just me. Ray Van De Walker,
and I have assented to GPL my writing in the Wikipedia. If you really like it, add it to the "good writing" link! (Something which I think would be unethical for me to do as author.)
Computer architecture types
Should this article mention things like the von Neumann and Harvard architectures, both of which have articles?
- Yes. This article needs considerable work. --Robert Merkel 13:38, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Configurable computing
I yanked a whole section on configurable computing. It's an interesting idea, but it's a fairly minor part of computer architecture and makes the article less readable for a non-expert. This whole article needs a rewrite. --Robert Merkel 13:38, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I do not agree with the remove. The section can either be improved or titled in a way that it is recognized as not beeing escential for understanding the current style - however the outlook is important for those that are prepared to work themself inot it. By the way the rest is not for nonexperts either! Togo 02:41, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- You're missing my point. I am stating that a whole paragraph on configurable computing, in the context of the article as it stands, gave a very misleading view of the importance of the topic to the broader field of computer architecture. As to the reading level of the article, it *should*, at least in its introduction, be accessible to the nonexpert. --Robert Merkel 04:05, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I agree with the removal. At most this page should have a brief mention and link to Reconfigurable computing. --Brouhaha 21:47, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Architecture vs Microarchitecture
> The discipline of computer architecture has three main subcategories: 1) Instruction Set Architecture, 2) Microarchitecture, 3) System Design
According to Coursera lecture (https://www.coursera.org/lecture/comparch/architecture-and-microarchitecture-rgQ8X) (see 19:40) it is possible that architecture is the same and the microarchitecture is different (AMD Phenom X4 vs. Intel Atom).
That is, treating microarchitecture as a part of architecture looks misleading. At least to the average person like me.
- When the lecturer refers to "big-A architecture", he's referring to the instruction set architecture. Microarchitecture (subcategory 2), like instruction set architecture (subcategory 1), is a part of the topic of computer architecture. Guy Harris (talk) 19:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
- C-Class electronic articles
- Top-importance electronic articles
- WikiProject Electronics articles
- C-Class Computing articles
- Top-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- C-Class Systems articles
- High-importance Systems articles
- Systems articles in systems engineering
- WikiProject Systems articles
- C-Class Computer science articles
- Top-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles