User talk:Viridae/Archive5
|
|---|
|
1:28/04/2006-25/06/2006 |
Dresden Codak
Can I get you to review your close of this, please? You've called it "no consensus" when there is a "no reliable sources" reasoning to delete and reliable sources with non-trivial mentions are not provided. - brenneman 00:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- I stand by the non consensus. Feel free to take it to WP:DRV. ViridaeTalk 08:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
January Greetings
Happy January 15th, 2007 Viridae. Did you know i have created over 50 articles? You can see them by viewing the bottom of my talkpage. Merry... January! --Chikinpotato11 16:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
ip ban on 204.193.6.90
your ip ban on 204.193.6.90 is a ban on a school what happened that made you ban that ip? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stapuft (talk • contribs) 14:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC).
If you'd like to hear from him in the WP:AN/I thread...
...you should probably drop him a note on his talk page. As far as I can see – following an admittedly very cursory examination – nobody has followed up with The JPS during this discussion. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 12:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Block precedent?
Hi. I'm curious about this block? A six-month block for an IP with three edits ever? Is it an open proxy? —Wknight94 (talk) 13:52, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh never mind. I see now it's probably a open proxy. Sorry to bother you... —Wknight94 (talk) 13:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
I was under the impression that physical threats were a reason for an immediate block, which is why I reported this user. TimVickers 00:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think they were more a case of a school aged child being idiotic, the primary offence being vandalism. ViridaeTalk 00:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Can Admins edit the Edit summary? If this threat could be removed then I would be less concerned. TimVickers 00:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- I cant edit it, but as it was an uncontructive edit I can delete the edit entirely. Doing that now. ViridaeTalk 00:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
The Bacteria article has now disappeared, is this normal? TimVickers 00:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- I deleted it and am in the process of restoring the 2200 revisions. I have to do it in bacthes because I'm getting an RSI checking all the check boxes. ViridaeTalk 00:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Ah, thank you. Sorry to bug you but my heart stopped for a moment! :) TimVickers 00:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- I see you have done a massive amount of work on the article, Barnstar coming your way when I finish with this! ViridaeTalk 00:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much! Thanks also for all that revision work. Ironically, after all that the moronic vandal didn't take the hint and re-inserted exactly the same threats. TimVickers 02:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Newyorkbrad's RfA
Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning, as well as for your kind comments accompanying your !vote. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 20:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Request for Comment- Please provide Third Party Input.
If you could check this out and provide your input, it would be appreciated. thank you. TheGreenFaerae 08:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Tr%C3%B6del
- Please, I need to get a full consensus of all users who can provide input before the 48 hour deadline passes. As you handled the ANI, your input could porve very important tot eh RfC. TheGreenFaerae 04:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your assistance. I was afraid it would be unlsited before it had a chance for review.TheGreenFaerae 05:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Kuru RFA
Thank you for the congrats and for your vote. It was actually a little creepy, since I was flipping through your logs for samples of speedy deletion edit summaries when the "new message" bar popped up. Here's to hoping I don't live up to my incidental namesake! :) Kuru talk 03:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Protection requested
I had long and way out of line-terrible argument with mkil who was vandalizing marciano and other pages, i also asked him not to talk to me or leave me any more messages, i do not want to talk to him, all messages are left on marciano dispute pages, tell him never to contact me again. Also Marciano page should be locked longer and mkil not allowed to be there. I have evidence he was logging on under some other ip 58.8 and had some of his friends join in on the "fun" He was warned not to revert many times in the past. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rocky_Marciano#Third_opinion Most of the info is here. Boxingwear
- I will make my decision when the protection is removed - I may contact another admin to watch over it for me and reprotect when the protection runs out over the weekend when I am away. Protection is not meant to be permanent, it was placed in this case so editing diputes stopped being fought in the article space. If this behaviour continues, I may just hand out blocks to whoever I think is involved. ViridaeTalk 23:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Right, i agree, but you have to look at the broader picture, on talk, right now, people agree with me, i also requested protection from mkil above, did you read that... i mean, wow. On a different subject... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Gwernol#Complaint This user deleted the lineal champions, we need to recreate it, reasons are given above and there are other people who agree with me, i can not believe why good articles are killed on wiki, bad remain...Boxingwear
If you'll look at the Marciano page, BoxingWear was told in no uncertain terms by another editor that my edits were not "vandalism." I requested a third party opinion that resulted in a strong chastisement of BoxingWear. He/She continues to assert that my edits are "vandalism" and that I log on under different IP addresses (which is false -- I welcome any attempts to trace IPs to see the truth of this). BoxingWear continues to attack me and refuses to recognize my good faith edits as legitimate. MKil 04:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)MKil
How to do things
What is the code to put things into archive, to merge or rename article or to put music or square on my talk page. Boxingwear Is there any way you administrators can find out if some other user has been using different ip, in order not to reveal who he is like mkil?Boxingwear
whaa? vandal?
Last spring I was looking at the group, The Residents, listing and found it full of mistakes and suppositions. I made extensive corrections which as manager and historian of the group seemed a rightful responsibility. Acutally I am the only authority for this subject as I also oversee www.residents.com. I am even named in the article as a participant in the group. I made all the changes under my real name as I was not playing games. I just discovered that back in June all my corrections reverted back to the errors and I was branded a "vandal" for removing other people's erronous speculations where it seems to me the person who revereted the material back to the errors is the vandal. I had a message from you from June that I am now resonding to claiming this. Maybe it was you who vandalized my corrections. I don't know since I am not a power user.
Anyway, I do not monitor The Residents page nor will I start doing so, but do wish that the term vandal was not generously handed out to us authorized individuals. Meanwhile, the Wikipedia page for The Residents remains flawed and by naming me a vandal I guess it will stay that way. I do not understand allowing the ignorant to freely speculate on Wikipedia while blocking the knowledgable from correcting data.
Hardy Fox <email removed> www.residents.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hfox (talk • contribs) 18:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC).
- Huh? I never warned you for vandalism. 02:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Irwin
Could you help me please? I have received my first warning on Wikipedia (I think from you). Last October there was vigorous debate regarding a quote from Germaine Greer inserted on Irwin's page. After this debate it was edited out and it remained that way for a couple of months until one person inserted it again. Based on previous discussion I and others deleted repeated attempts to insert it again. We suggested that this person read the archives – it seemed to me this person had not read the discussion. The last suggestion to this person was to discuss it before reinserting it. There has been extensive discussion and (at the risk of only presenting my side) all but two people did not want it reinserted for many good reasons. I am confused as to why the person making an insertion in these circumstances gets protection whilst another who removes this with the consent of the discusscion page gets blocked. What should I do. It seems unconscionable to permit this insertion. Alan Davidson 12:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC) I have now noticed you warned both of us. That does seem fairer. Many thanks. Alan Davidson 12:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Please Be slow
Hello dear still discussion is going on page so u can not Vandlize my page before it. Khalidkhoso 10:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Some countries mention Hezbollah as terrorist but some does not? Does this make it terrorist .what will you write on it? Artilce .Just need answer then I will change my user page and should stop vandalizing my page. And u sent me are for personal attacks ,I am not attacking on it ,I am writing some thing that most of communities think and write I can show you material if you want regarding it.
Khalidkhoso 10:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
I do not have to say any thing ,it is like taking decison to Hanging some1 and later asking him "Do you have any thing to protect ur self" .u lokced my page and u took decison .what else i would ,Say.But fine i would not use flags on my pgae(Just inWikipedia). when u r going to allow me to edit my Userpage.