User talk:Reinis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Termer (talk | contribs) at 23:06, 28 July 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Looks good. I can try to put the references in, but you can put them in if I don't get to it. I'll just take off the "db" tag. Regards, Ursasapien (talk) 11:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I must really thank you for starting this article. It's about time we had it. TheKillerAngel 01:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, PowerRangers435 (talk · contribs) created it, I just wikified it and added the sources. :) Reinistalk 07:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My name

Good lord, his last name is "Lawliet"? I think I just went from loving the thriller element of that book to not caring about anything except how bad his name is. Anyway, no, L was more annoying than anything else. Raito wins, easily, if it weren't for super lame desu ex machina. Seriously, "OH HI, THIS IS WHAT YOU GET FOR MAKING ME A MINOR CHARACTER, YOU BASTARD *shoot*" is NOT a good ending --Laugh! 08:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...desu

User:L/uw-desu --Laugh! 08:44, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this has been fun, but we should probably make at least a little bit of an effort to be serious-desu. --Laugh! 09:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am very seriose, desu. I'll steal your user infobox now. Reinistalk 09:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
I present Reinis with the Graphic Designer's Barnstar for helping me out greatly in modifying some icons so that I could use them effectively. The results were brilliant, and I am extremely appreciative of your work. Cheers, Daniel 11:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Horrid isn't it.

Just makes you feel kind of... dirty... doesn't it. :). ornis (t) 11:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Garda40

I'm puzzled why you told me not to remove content ,which you removed shortly before you visited my user page .Garda40 11:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Compare: [1] [2]
You blanked the page, I only removed the tag. Reinistalk
Which is what I was aiming for myself but went too far with the removal ( a mistake I didn't realised until after I posted to your page .Thanks Garda40 11:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. :) Reinistalk 11:51, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Imam Zakaria Badat. I do not think that Imam Zakaria Badat fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because "unreferenced" and "fails Google test" are simply not valid speedy deletion reasons. A7 is, bu there are multiple claims of significance in this article. They may be inaccurate, but they are present, and not obviously false or impossible ("Joe is king of the world") so an A7 speedy is improper. i suggest you try PROD or in this case AfD if you think this should be deleted.. I request that you consider not re-tagging Imam Zakaria Badat for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk) 17:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making it clear, I'll do it with AfD. Reinistalk 18:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

speedy declined

Please check recent discussions at AfD-- All towns and even villages are notable. You may think this odd, but such is the consistent practice here. If the article is of poor quality edit it; if it contains unverified material, try to verify it. If it can not be verified and you think it wrong or unverifiable, remove it. But leave the basic information. DGG (talk) 18:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks. Reinistalk 18:59, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Latvia

Hey, be informed of existance of Wikipedia:WikiProject Latvia for it wouldn't hurt if you'd notify people that you have tagged some articles recently /and, of course, if you carve to edit articles in scope of the project, consider joining/ In my humble oppinion it is not OK to simply remove references if links are broken or don't lead stright to fact (e.g. every link to Latvijas Banka's homepage redirects to its main page), you should find working link to the reference instead ---- Xil/talk 22:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tagging

Please feel free to improve the article Latvia by introducing specific fact tags in the text or raise any questions on the discussion page. Tagging the whole article that is in a general good condition, that has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team, is included in the 2006 Wikipedia CD Selection, or is a candidate for inclusion in the next version, is not acceptable. Therefor please remove the general tag ASAP and in the future please do not misuse the tags in WP. Thanks--Termer 23:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]