Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 September 8

< September 7	September 9 >

September 8

Image:UtKRZu.svg

Image:UtKRZu.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:Pyrotec (notify | contribs). Obsolete repalced by BSicon ueKRZu.svg Pyrotec 23:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC) Delete This looks like an import version maybe? As the album title hasn't even been released yet, I would say let's just wait a bit until the record label releases the album art and title. Ejfetters 04:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Britney'snewalbum.jpg

Image:Britney'snewalbum.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:Malcolmo (notify | contribs).

It says that it's the albums cover but it doesn't look like one and if it was one, it would have her name and the name of the album. CRocka05 19:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is the image that Amazon is using for the album: [1]. John Vandenberg 22:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteImage appears to be, maybe an import cover? The album title and cover haven't been released, I say let's just wait a bit until it has officially been announced and the cover released. Ejfetters 07:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Spenco'.jpg

Image:Spenco'.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Zipeeds (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, LQ. Used on now-deleted page. - Calton | Talk 01:00, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Isn't encyclopedic now that its article has been deleted. Spawn Man 04:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:KaczurakCover2.jpg

Image:KaczurakCover2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Absolutkaz (notify | contribs).

Orphaned SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Soul.jpg

Image:Soul.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rustyboneyard (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, possible copyvio (no source or copyright tags) SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dark knight joker promo poster.jpg.jpg

Image:Dark knight joker promo poster.jpg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hcb (notify | contribs).

UE fan-made poster (see use by fan of Batman Begins credits text, which wouldn't ordinarily be in a teaser poster anyways, as those usually give image, date, or season, and possibly title), being represented as actual official material on relevant movie page. Image has appeared on various movie-rumor sites, so uploader can't claim copyright as creator, and the title demonstrates that handily, in the double .jpg extensions. ThuranX 04:47, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fancruft. Alientraveller 10:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kinstone.JPG

Image:Kinstone.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MinishCap (notify | contribs).

Speedy Deletion candidate from 8/7 never deleted, no source information Ejfetters 05:28, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Business Bay Advertisement on 30 January 2007.jpg

Image:Business Bay Advertisement on 30 January 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Leitmanp (notify | contribs).

Derivative work. Uploader is already notified. MER-C 05:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Presidentsyria.jpg

Image:Presidentsyria.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Samosyr (notify | contribs).

Wrong lincese, and there's no evidence that Syrian Arab News Agency licenses its images under {{GFDL}} whatsoever. Dantadd 09:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
this image of Bashar al-Assad is replaceable with images on the commons such as Image:Syria.BasharAlAssad.01.jpg. Also note that this image has been copied to the commons:Image:Presidentsyria.jpg, and it has been tagged for speedy deletion there. Anyone feel up to writing a stub on Syrian Arab News Agency? :-) John Vandenberg 22:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HalloweenIII1 masks.jpg

Image:HalloweenIII1 masks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dmoon1 (notify | contribs).

Unknown original source, tag claims released for promotional use. Source cited is a fansite, and original source is unknown. Ejfetters 12:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The source given is indicating where the image was hosted when it was uploaded (i.e. the immediate source); it also hints that the original source was "Dino De Laurentiis Corp". The image at the immediate source[2] appears to be a scanned article, with the first image in the gallery indicating the article was in Twilight Zone. Note that the article it is used on is a featured article. John Vandenberg 22:28, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- But, as you state, it hints at the original source, we do not have an original source that it is from, therefore its copyright status cannot be verified and is unclear. As stated before, if this is replaceable with a screencap then it should be done so and tagged accordingly. Featured article status does not qualify the image for not adhering to image policies. Ejfetters 02:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - It is not imperative that we know the original source, although that would make things easier. It is more important to determine that it was used for promotional purposes. As this image was in a promotional article in a magazine, that may be sufficient; I am not 100% certain of the case law tho. wrt to being a featured article, it does mean that many eyes have seen this image already and deemed it ok. They may be wrong or may have not been paying attention, but it is important that we take care. John Vandenberg 02:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Okay, I changed it to a screenshot. — Enter Movie 02:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - - The only thing that has been changed is the copyright tag, nomination not withdraw. Ejfetters 04:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - Also, I do believe it is important to have the original source, how else could we verify the copyright status? There are several images on fansites that are not allowed and not official, and we cannot cite the unofficial fansite as the image's source, the copyright status would be unclear if we did so. Ejfetters 04:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Please do not continue to claim it is from a fansite and suggest it shouldnt be trusted on that basis; I have made it quite clear the image is from a printed magazine. Why do you think it is inappropriate fair use to include images scanned from a printed magazine? John Vandenberg 04:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Please state the name of the magazine, the volume/issue, date released, so the copyright can be verified. I never claimed this was from a fansite, simply that you stated we don't need to verify original sources, original sources are the means of finding the original copyright, which is necessary. I don't understand why someone just can't upload a color screenshot which is not using the entire image (a screenshot is one frame of many in a film) and then the film can be sourced, and the copyright verified. This claims this image was released for promotional use, we simply don't have the proof that this image was released for promotional use. Ejfetters 06:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Refer to my first message for the information you want. Thanks. John Vandenberg 07:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        Not sure if this is sufficient, since its just a claim its from the magazine. I now rest my point and await an admin's decision, since all that can be said has pretty much been said. Ejfetters 08:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This image was scanned from the article "TZ Screen Preview: Halloween III" in The Twilight Zone Magazine, November 1982 issue, p. 51. The image copyright is owned by Universal Pictures. Dmoon1 20:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- - - - Sounds sufficient now I would say, as long as the information here is posted with the image itself, then I would say keep. Ejfetters 18:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vanessa-hudgens-4.jpg

Image:Vanessa-hudgens-4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pau07 (notify | contribs).

Disgusting, inappropriate display of Ms. Hudgens' privacy and dignity. Fanficgurl 3:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

The image is on the commons, and is not currently used on Wikipedia. Is the subject Vanessa Anne Hudgens? If so, then I think the image can be removed from commons based on copyright. John Vandenberg 22:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is the subject, and I have launched a deletion discussion on commons: commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/2007/09/08 John Vandenberg 23:31, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CurtisMayfield-Superfly-Autographed.jpg

Image:CurtisMayfield-Superfly-Autographed.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DJ Mittens (notify | contribs).

Unnecessary duplication of Image:CurtisMayfieldSuperfly.jpg FuriousFreddy 19:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BobbyandJessie.JPG

Image:BobbyandJessie.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by P.W.Lutherson (notify | contribs).

Contested prod. The reasons to remove this image was that it was a fusion of two non-free images, and the contributor P.W.Lutherson (talk · contribs) is trying to use it on Miscegenation while its fair-use rationale is for it being used on Disappearance and murder of Jessie Davis. John Vandenberg 22:16, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The uploader is a sock puppet of Auno3 (talk · contribs), who uploaded one of the constituent images, Image:BobbyCuttsJr.jpg. There is no need for this composite image, and its user is in violation of copyright. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 23:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]