Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archaeobiologist

Archaeobiologist

Dictionary-like entry. Page was started as a hoax definition, "fixed" at some point. Nothing links to it, and I'm not sure that it is in fact a subdiscipline of Archaeology. SolidPlaid 02:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Let some time for it to be something more than a stub, the discipline appears genuine: Archaeobiology Program at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. Tazmaniacs 02:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that's Archaeobiology, for which no page exists. This page should at best redirect there (if it existed). SolidPlaid 02:24, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - HOAX, OR, NN. The closest I could find is Zooarchaeology, Environmental archaeology, and Archaeobotany, all of which are legitimate. I think someone either created this page as a hoax or they didn't know what the actual name was for the practise, so created an incorrectly named article instead. There aren't many links from Google ([1]), and even then it says "Did you mean Archaeozoologist?" just confirming that this article may been an article intended to be for Zooarchaeology. Spawn Man 05:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment HOAX and OR has already been disproven by Tazmaniacs. Turlo Lomon 05:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've already given other reasons. Spawn Man 05:50, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete but open to recreate once more information is obtained on Archaeobiology, a page created, and then Archaeobiologist would be a redirect. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Turlo Lomon 05:37, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note Actually, referencing the above link supplied, redirecting to Archaeological sub-disciplines may be a valid fix for this. Turlo Lomon —Preceding unsigned comment added by Turlo Lomon (talk • contribs) 05:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]