Personal thoughts and frame of mind

Paramount^© are a bunch of a****** to cancel Star Trek: Enterprise, sincerely.

I agree. → JarlaxleArtemis 04:14, May 10, 2005 (UTC)

User:Stereotek and User:Davenbelle are no longer welcome to post anything in my userspace due to their lack of good faith. Their posts are likely to be deleted until further notice. So please don't waiste my time User:Stereotek and User:Davenbelle just keep quite and do your own thing. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 22:02, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

People who live in the past will always stay in the past, people who live in the future who don't learn from the past still live in the past. I live in the future learning from peoples' mistakes in the past as well as my own. Cool Cat ^{My Talk}

Things I learned so far.

NEVER EVER let laptop be luggage rather than carry-on, TSA people are too stupid to handle a laptop. Yes I am a terrorist, I was a suicide bomber 4 times in the past year. You can find my peices scattered on 4 different blast zones in 4 different continents. :P

User:Davenbelle + User:Stereotek <-> me

Number of reverts of this page by User: Davenbelle: 6

Number of reverts of this page by User: Stereotek: 6

User posts: Monday, 3 June 2024 - 04:11 (UTC)

Abortion

ok. while the topic can be contraversial I did not remove anything. See how again my edits and hard work is gone. Please assist. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 15:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Have you ever seen this? If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, do not submit it. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 16:07, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes. But like "Bad Wolf" of Dr. Who, Same individuals are appearing on all wiki time frames. I just want to deal and reason with individuals and not senseless reverts. You were talking about doing something about this on RfC page. I am all ears.

I see you as a guide as you are one hell of a guide. Should I reopen my RfC case directly and tell it to the two people (you and silsor) to comment? Or some other course of action? --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 23:18, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Special thanks

Thanks for reminding the policy of Wikipedia everytime , especially about the neutrality of the articles. Have A Nice Day aozan

GAP Project

If you revert the GAP Project page to the copyvio one more time, I will block you for 24 hours. Rick K 21:27, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

Vandal bot

Hi Coolcat, that's an excellent system you got running there. Can I ask you though - why does everything the bot posts have a black background, at least in GAIM? The 'excuse' is coming out as black text on a black background, which of course isn't good :-) Dan100 (Talk) 13:26, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

Actualy the color codes works fne on Mirc. I'll change excuse text to something else, hopefully makeing it readale. Its Cyan on mirc. The black background is to make sure the text is readable. It is just a quencedence of GAIM to read both color codes as the same maybe. Ill change it to something else. Tell me if it looks better. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 20:04, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You are leaving?

Please no! I just hope this is a wikibreak... Ta bu shi da yu 04:17, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I serriously considered leaving. Infact I was gone for 15 days plus. Later decided to make it a temprorary wiki vacation. Its an extended vacation untill I resolve some issues with the two users who "mercilessly" revert stalk my edits. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 10:39, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Glad to see that things are sorted :-) Ta bu shi da yu 23:35, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Things arent quite sorted yet. I still recieve my revert stalking experience. I am less inclined to edit at the moment. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 12:57, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What's happening?

Who's stalking you? - Ta bu shi da yu 23:40, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I have commented on the talk page of Armenian Genocide. I do not have any knowledge of this article or the issue it documents. However, I have noticed many words in the article that must be sourced. The article is not neutral, IMO, until this can be done. I am unsure what the issues are that you documented, or which side of the political divide you exist on: I have made my comments as a disinterested 3rd party. As that disinterested 3rd party, I have no preconceptions about this article as I have no knowledge of it. I have made my comments in such a manner. I hope this helps. If there are further issues to be aware of then I would be happy to hear them: I would also be happy to hear from the other side (whoever they are). - Ta bu shi da yu 02:49, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)

If you file another RFC and provide detailed evidence, along with the specific policies that the behaviour has affected, I will look into having it endorsed. However, please make sure that you provide sufficient evidence that at least two users have attempted to resolve the problem. My suggestion is to use the following RFC as a guide: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Alfrem. - Ta bu shi da yu 1 July 2005 01:08 (UTC)

Coolcat, I've just been talking to Fadix, and I'm wondering if we can drop the whole RFC business. I say this because the Armenian Genocide page became heated and I fear that both sides (Fadix and yourself) have traded insults and personal remarks :-( For the good of the article, would you be willing to say sorry to Fadix about those things (not about your stance on the article - I'm not asking for apologies on opinions held!)? I have said the exact same thing to Fadix. I hope that you won't find this to be an insult and if you find my suggestion offensive then please understand that I am only trying to find a way forward on the article, and of course find a way that two fine editors of Wikipedia can coexist on this site, even when they have strongly differing opinions! - Ta bu shi da yu 2 July 2005 01:59 (UTC)

Ah! Just saw the RFC - I thought it was filed against Fadix! Plesae ignore my comments on the RFC, they were made out of ignorance. I will review it and comment. My other comments about the dispute between Fadix and yourself still stand though... I hope the two of you can work together, rather than against each other. - Ta bu shi da yu 2 July 2005 02:05 (UTC)

GAP project

Coolcat, I've processed about a thousand copyvios. I have never accepted anonymous permission to use previously published material. I held this page to the same standards as every other copyvio I've evaluated. How can you say you were unfairly treated?

You said that you re-wrote the history pages that I deleted, yet they contained at least a full paragraph of copied, previously published material. (let me know if you want me to email you the text in question, not being an administrator you won't be able to see the deleted history I'm talking about).

Finally, why don't you say to my face what you've been saying behind my back??--Duk 2 July 2005 00:47 (UTC)

I am not talking behind your back. I am not jumping from admin pages to another, filling RfC cases etc. I just ask people to compare the copy vio page and the alleged page. I tell them copy vio im MY pov is unaproporate. I have every right to do that. They compare and react. If a paragraph is indeed copied from the site and is not on the canadian PD site, feel free to delete it. Just tell me exactly what you deleted so I can rewrite and re add knowlege back to the article. Please do not remove everything but only the copy vio material, just because a paragraph (Id love to know which) is violating "copyrights" (who owns copyrights?) doesnt mean you get to delete everything. All images on the article with the exeption of two are from the same US PD source. Just google image search for the image file names. The other two, one is fair use of areal picture of ataturk dam and other is a graph created by a felow wiki user which replaced the "bad" us gov graph. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 2 July 2005 01:00 (UTC)

Finaly, I do think your judgement is unfair. You are in error, partialy if not completely. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 2 July 2005 01:05 (UTC)

What was my error? Not taking anonymous granting of copyright licensing? Do you honestly believe that Wikipedia should accept anonymous granting of copyright licensing? And if you are really the author of the text in question, why didn't you note earlier that it was PD? --Duk 2 July 2005 01:17 (UTC)

I sent you an email; Coolcat, below is a sample of copied text from the GAP project's second copyvio deletion (this is the version that you said you re-wrote)...

...copied text emailed to Coolcat, admins can see the page at [1]...

It contains exact copies as well as derived writing from http://www.adiyamanli.org/ataturk_dam.htm. When I evaluated this copyvio there was no evidence that it was PD, only an assertion from you that you rewrote it. As you can see from this sample, you didn't fully re-write it.

--Duk 2 July 2005 14:25 (UTC)

This isnt something adiyamanli.org made up. It was Turkish Gov's plans. --Cool Cat My Talk 2 July 2005 15:07 (UTC)

Are Turkish Gov. plans PD? And did you note this when you first posted the article? Did you note this and provide a source when the copyvio was being evaluated? Or are you now, weeks later, trying to explain away you plagersim and copyright violations and paint yourself as a victim?--Duk 2 July 2005 15:12 (UTC)

I would have thought you would make sure material that apears to be copy vio is not in any PD sites so as not to clutter copy vio system. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 2 July 2005 15:21 (UTC)

If you want to used previously published material in Wikipedia it's up to you to identify the source, its licence and to note all of this on the article's talk page. Do this BEFORE you copy, not weeks after the copyvio has been processed--Duk 2 July 2005 15:36 (UTC)

Starfleet ranks and insignia FAC

I also personally think the FAC was too soon, so I ask you to close this nomination and figure out what is going on. We still have a problem with mainly sources, not with images this time. However, we cannot find all of the sources during the FAC period, so we should at least send it to peer review before making it to the FAC for the fourth time. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 2 July 2005 15:52 (UTC)

Ashida Kim

Hi Coolcat. I did reinsert your photo, and I don't object to your other edits, but I want to keep as much info, pro and con, in the article as possible. That was why I rolled back to the earlier version. I'm not going to put anything in myself. I did relink to your photo, and please feel free to put in as much other stuff as you like, I was mostly concerned not to lose anything. Sorry about the mix up. Fire Star 2 July 2005 17:34 (UTC)