Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Nominations/Milk's Favorite Cookie
Milk's Favorite Cookie
Milk's Favorite Cookie (talk · contribs) Hello everyone. I would really love to resolve disputes, and I have resolved some so far, so that is the reason why I would like to be in the Meditation Committee. Since my time here on Wikipedia, I have piled up over 20,000 edits, and I hope soon to become an administrator. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 17:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Questions from Committee members:
- What are the core principles of Mediation Committee mediation?
- The core principles of the Committee is to:
- Put an end to disputes
- To assist an current dispute
- Discussions during formal mediation are privileged; they cannot be used against the parties in later proceedings (e.g. RfArb/RfC). Why is that important?
- Keeping in mind that Meditation is not binding, editors must be open in regards to there concerns, or they could cause another Dispute.
- What prior experience do you have in resolving disputes on Wikipedia? Please provide links, and how will these experiences help you to be an effective Committee member?
- A good amount. For example this user violated several 3RR violations, and caused a large dispute between several editors on Garage Kids. She removed notices several times, that were given to her, not being Civil or assuming good faith. I'm also currently trying to resolve a dispute. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 17:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Could you point to previous experience that you have in solving disputes? Ryan Postlethwaite 02:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Mediation Committee:
Community opinions:
- I support. New blood is good. Mønobi 17:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support - he has helped me resolve things at times, and I think this would be good for him. jj137 (talk) 02:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Discussion and comments:
Decision of the Mediation Committee: