Talk:2007 Pacific typhoon season

Events Archives: January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December;

Other basin talkpages (2007): Atlantic - W. Pacific - Central and East Pacific - N. Indian - S. Hemisphere

Text JMA advisories

JMA advisories can be found here; they are overwritten with each new advisory, so they should be archived using WebCite. --Core desat 07:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks i wasnt sure where you were getting the written JMA Advisorys from.Jason Rees 20:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The JMA Advisorys can also be found here when there is a second storm in progress Thanks Jason Rees 18:46, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And here if there are three. --Ajm⁸¹ 18:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Krosa

About aftermath in China: [1] --213.155.231.26 11:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Committee

Has it met yet?. Jason Rees 04:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was scheduled for November 21-26: [2] HkCaGu 05:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks i have managed to find an english langague source for the replacement names it also looks as if there was no Retired storms this year Jason Rees (talk) 01:51, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not surprised, since there weren't any real brutal storms (to WPAC standards) - the deadliest storm was only a TD according to the JMA (a JTWC TS)... CrazyC83 (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PAGASA did not officially named a storm "Nonoy"

Although PAGASA declared that there would be a possiblity of a storm entering the PAR and that they would name it "Nonoy" while the storms "Lando and "Mina" were devastating the country, it never happened. I could not see any tropical storm advisory from the PAGASA website since morning of November 29, 2007. -Pika ten10 (talk) 04:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You sure? There are several news bulletins for a storm called Nonoy, while Lando and Mina were active. --Hurricanehink (talk) 04:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you see those news bulletins??? Take note that what the PAGASA website declares is official in the Philippine weather (it's their official website), while what the news declares on weather is not necessarily official. -Pika ten10 (talk) 10:30, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, but the news bulletins listed below call the depression Nonoy (several say clearly that PAGASA classified it as Nonoy). I think it would be odd for the news sites to call it Nonoy when PAGASA never named it. --Hurricanehink (talk) 16:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PAGASA said that they only classified it as, in my own words, as a potential tropical depression. However, I reiterate I haven't noticed a storm named like "Nonoy". -Pika ten10 (talk) 03:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see it on the PAGASA website - but I wasn't really checking it very often. - SpLo T // 14:28, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following links mention the depression being named "Nonoy" - [3], [4], [5], and [6], some of which clearly say that PAGASA named the depression. --Hurricanehink (talk) 16:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One of your references say that depression, to be named "Nonoy", is only brewing. It means it has never formed. Note: A brewing beer is not totally a beer, but a 'potential beer'. -Pika ten10 (talk) 03:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm leaning toward Nonoy not being used, given these edits - [7] and [8]. If anyone wants to remove the reference to Nonoy, feel free to. Sorry I was being so difficult everyone! --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to Typhoon 2000 Pagasa did not name 25W Nor 26W Nando but they have not added all of the PAGASA Storms yet.Jason Rees (talk) 21:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not see any bulletins for Nonoy which is why I took it off when Mina and Lando were active. TY2000 stormlog only shows 13 named storms of 2007 right nowStormLog 2007. - グリフオーザー (talk) 01:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning Hagibis und Mitag

Great Coastal Gale of 2007 states that the remnants of Hagibis and Mitag enhanced the effects of the storm that bashed Oregon, Washington and BC.

Could this be verified?
If affirmative, probably should the fact included into this article?

The claim obviously origins in this newspaper artcile. However a more "official" source should be found. --Matthiasb-DE (talk) 16:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's some info on the storms here, from the NWS, but none of the links mention any relation to Hagibis or Mitag. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile I found this and I guess it's a reliable source. --Matthiasb-DE (talk) 20:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]