User talk:Henrik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bramfab (talk | contribs) at 21:55, 5 March 2008 (→‎Thanks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome! This is my user talk page. If you want to communicate with me for any reason, especially about pages I have made or edited, or any reverts I did, feel free to do so here.
I will generally reply here, unless you request otherwise. Please start a new section for new conversations.

I agree with you about leaving out the suspect's name, especially since it's dealing with a minor. Is there another place to point out where it would be against WP policy besides the "do no harm" reference? The user doesn't seem to think it's enough, so I'm looking for another guideline to show him/her. Then again, the one you mentioned is reason enough but he/she seems to think otherwise. Thank you. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 22:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know alot of the major news sources had already given out his name...hmmm. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 22:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have seen that, but a Wikipedia article will be visible for a long time - probably longer than a news article which will be buried within a few days by new stories. It is important to get it right, especially with minors involved. That is why I am advocating restraint and patience in this case. henriktalk 22:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, gotcha. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 22:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uga Man

Thank you for the support of Uga Man's joke on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Uga Man/presidential campaign, 2008. Basketball110 what famous people say ♣ 18:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice page for statistics.

Hi,
I am really glad you made the statistics page. I was searching for it for quite long time now and finally I found my way to the page you made. Awesome job !!! Now-a-days I am enriching the articles Vidarbha & Nagpur and was wondering if anyone really visited them. I was surprised to see the figures for them on your stats page. The articles have decent visitor count than I expected. Such a good tool really boosts our morale & inspires us to continue our work. gppande (talk) 07:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It's nice to find out that there are actually readers out there, isn't it? :-) henriktalk 08:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes,like it a lot. Don't remove it as written on tool page. I hope you are kidding :-)) gppande «talk» 16:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's really cool. I have a question though... How accurate/reliable/full is the data? Does it include all views (registered/unregistered/admins/etc)? Thank you, Renata (talk) 05:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Waterboarding 2.
For the Mediation Committee, WjBscribe 19:15, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Most visited User page

Henrik, I like the site you created which tells us how many hits each wiki article has had. Hoping you can help me out, which user page on wiki do you think is the most visited? Do you have any ideas? I was just interested thats all, there are a lot of crazy ones out there which would have taken people a lot of time to create. Any crazy or unusual ones you could tell me about? Thank YaRoadrunnerz45 (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Top 10 in February were (from 10 downto 1):
henriktalk 08:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Henrik, this tool is awesome. Is there any way for us mere plebs to query the data directly? e.g supply a date and maybe a namespace (or a list of pages), and an ordered list of results back? thanks! pfctdayelise (talk) 12:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

The Original Barnstar
Your article hit counter is fucking awesome. I hereby award you this barnstar. Rise, sir knight. Tlogmer ( talk / contributions ) 06:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! henriktalk 08:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 10 3 March 2008 About the Signpost

Wales' relationship, breakup with journalist Rachel Marsden raises questions about possible improprieties Eleven users apply for bureaucratship 
Signpost interview: Domas Mituzas Role of hidden categories under discussion 
Book review: Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Military history WikiProject elections conclude, nine elected 
Best of WikiWorld: "Extreme ironing" News and notes: Encyclopedia of Life, Wikipedian dies, milestones 
Dispatches: April Fools mainpage featured article WikiProject Report: Football 
Tutorial: How to use an ImageMap Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surprising result with the statistics page.

Hello !
For the views of "Louis Pasteur" on the French Wikipedia, the results are strange : 53194 in February, the half on the same day... Hard to believe...
(Edit : for January, it is OK.) Marvoir (talk) 10:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it was featured in a WP:DYK entry on the front page that day, or in a news story on another web site? Spikes like that usually come from a prominant incoming link, methinks. -Pete (talk) 10:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this answer. You are likely right.

Marvoir (talk) 12:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for creating the statistics. I've been waiting for this since 2003. I need to know what I do matters. Now I know. More than I ever imagined. Thanks again 71.191.42.242 (talk) 17:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


  • Congratulation. Nice & good tool --Bramfab 21:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Since When?

  1. REDIRECT Insert textHi! When was the stats page first posted? Thanx! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Isa cota (talkcontribs) 19:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]