Talk:Nicotine marketing

Where are the pictures?

this page needs descriptive pictures and exaamples. perhaps displaying the changes in tobaccoo adertisements over time and the differences in international tobbaco advertisements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.5.1.99 (talk) 18:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date on US

The last ad aired on December 31, 1971, as the ban went into effect on January 1, 1972. I've changed the date. Mike H (Talking is hot) 16:29, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for that - wondered where the slight confusion had come from and that clears it up. violet/riga (t) 16:31, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NASCAR

I've added an entire section on NASCAR, and encourage you to expand/edit it and make it better. I have a decent knowledge of the NASCAR/Winston relationship, but my writing isn't the clearest, so if you can clean things up and make it more readable, please do! Thanks, Anorris 00:18, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

That's an excellent addition - thank you very much! violet/riga (t) 08:13, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I replaced your Nextel Cup logo with the former Winston Cup logo.

US ads and cigars

The United States section needs to be changed a bit. Ads for cigars are still permitted on media outlets. --Tv's emory 06:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising image at Image:1978 virginia slims ad.jpg

This image was tagged as lacking a fair use rationale, as it was uploaded long before whatever new procedures have been posted in recent months requiring more detail on the image description page. I've posted what I consider a valid rationale (for its use in Virginia Slims—I don't believe I've ever edited this article), but these days I am not on here very often, and so would appreciate any help from other current contributors to this article in making sure the rationale is substantial and detailed enough to fend off any misguided attempts to delete the image. Cheers, Postdlf 17:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Winston Cup Logo.png

Image:Winston Cup Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaii pro-smoking adverts in Japan

http://adweek.blogs.com/adfreak/2007/08/hawaii-unsure-h.html

Amusing and may be worthy of inclusion. violet/riga (t) 10:52, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Strategies that should be Noted

l. From 1988 (75th anniversary of Camel brand) to 1997 the Joe Camel campaign, widely believed to be aimed at children, included hundreds of matchbooks published by the D. D. Bean company, each containing a joke about Joe Camel and his friends in the rock band, etc. It is well known that children avidly collect jokes. Conceivably this had the double objective of getting children involved with cigarettes and also with matches, which share with cigarettes the features of being a fire hazard and polluting (and 20 to the pack in US). More subtly, matches are more difficult to use than a lighter should one attempt to use a mini-toke utensil instead of a cigarette. The companies want above all to keep the smoking population addicted to the hot-burning overdose format now entrenched and prevent future smokers from using a "conservative" (less profitable) approach.

2. For decades slender cigarettes have been marketed, but almost always on the premise that they are for women. This serves to antagonize or intimidate men and boys who fear the stigma of effeminateness and will avoid a slender cigarette ("slimmer than the fat cigarettes men smoke!)" Fatter cigarettes tend to burn hotter and have a more addictive impact, advantageous to the industry profit margin.

3. Near the end of the Joe Camel era Reynolds introduced "Camel Wides", advertised as "smoother" like the Joe Camel character himself ("smooth character"). Likely their research indicated children would fall for this. It was withdrawn with the Joe Camel character under litigation pressure in 1997.

This year (2007) there is again an effort to promote "wide" cigarettes, again with the fallacious claim that they are "smoother" (Camel and Kool brands). The Camel ads read: "Big, fat and Delicious!" They run as an insert in free weekly papers read by youngsters including under 18.

Why would "wider" cigarettes burn hotter? Due to the larger lateral area the smoker will see more smoke escape unused unless he or she sucks harder, thus stoking up a higher burning temperature. A figure published decades ago for the burning temperature in the tip of a cigarette (you can look up the ref) is 1500 degrees F (860 C)-- seven inches from your trachea.

Please examine, and as needed source the above and consider ways to enter it in the article. The encyclopedia has a duty to provide not just history but protective warnings for the sake of children. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.107.3.5 (talk) 21:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tobacco lobbying

I've removed the Tobacco lobbying link since there is no such page at Wikipedia. If one is created, the link should be re-established. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.234.222.96 (talk) 19:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]