Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 August 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.44.22.12 (talk) at 21:26, 11 August 2008 (→‎Image:Wcwilliams.jpg). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

< August 10 August 12 >

August 11

Image:Dmitri Rogozin.jpg

Find it hard to imagine author was this close (without further explanation). He would have to be a reporter to get this shot. Superm401 - Talk 00:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Matlock 2.jpg

Source website claims that this is a Francis Firth card dated from the 1930s. I am not seeing why this is public domain. J Milburn (talk) 10:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Matlock 1.jpg

Photograph from 1910s. No indication it was published at the time or that the copyright holder has released this in any way. J Milburn (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:New.Bondpedia.Logo.jpg

Appears to incorporate the copyrighted Bond opening sequence, meaning that even if this is the uploader's own work, they have no right to release it. J Milburn (talk) 11:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nangsibsong1.jpg

Image very unlikely to be owned by website owner- they seem to just steal images from elsewhere and then not credit/half credit. J Milburn (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chateau Montaigu.jpg

Appears to be a scan/photo of an old sketch/engraving. Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder of the source image. J Milburn (talk) 11:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as no source and no license for the original work --Rlandmann (talk) 21:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Old image of hari parbat.jpg

Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. J Milburn (talk) 11:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dee Dee Bridgewater 2005.jpg

I don't think Vance Jacobs is an employee of the U.S. government... Lupo 11:24, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The photo was taken from the NEA website. If they don't own the rights to the photo they always say "published by permission of...". In this case they didn't which means it is a government photo. Furthermore, the photo was taken at a concert organized by the NEA, so the liklihood that Vance was hired to take photos by the federal government is high. Nrswanson (talk) 12:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wcwilliams.jpg

No indication at source that the image is public domain. DrKiernan (talk) 11:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Williams was born in 1883. Here is Williams in 1924 [1]. It clearly post-dates the image above; by a decade or two, I would say. 86.44.22.12 (talk) 21:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Reznikoffphotobig.jpg

Source is a dead link, and as the original source was a student at Wash U, it is unlikely that they were the copyright holder. DrKiernan (talk) 11:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RecoveredMatisse'.jpg

Image is tagged as PD as it was first published pre-1923, but was only painted in 1928. J Milburn (talk) 11:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, The recovery of the painting in question is discussed in the aricle, plus I have added a rationale for it's use. I have also changed the "tag" Tony the Marine (talk) 14:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cx I9P0111.JPG

Posed, looks like a publicity shot, which is somewhat suspicious without an explanation. J Milburn (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LAX Adventurer Hotel Zoe Crosher.jpg

I doubt an image is both FAL and PD, and the source website doesn't seem to say anything about either. J Milburn (talk) 12:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MarkLamarr.jpg

Appears to be a duplicate of this image. J Milburn (talk) 12:41, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IainLee.jpg

Appears to be a duplicate of this image. J Milburn (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Magnetic disc system for polishing.jpg

Source website is all rights reserved, I am not seeing any indication that this image is free. J Milburn (talk) 12:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ineson.jpg

Appears to be a duplicate of this image. J Milburn (talk) 12:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vacuum impregnation equipment.jpg

Source website does not appear to license content under the GFDL. J Milburn (talk) 12:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hot mounting press.jpg

Source website does not appear to license under GFDL, but a specific source wasn't given so I can't be sure. J Milburn (talk) 12:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Oracle_data_organisation.jpg

PD claim- But assumed (C) IBA And thus possibly Crown Copyright? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thamesvalley2.png

No indication of GFDL relase on source site Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thamesvalley2.png

No indication of GFDL relase on source site Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:New_aerial_after_switchover.jpg

Ukfree.tv sourced - No indication that site licenses as PD Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Three_muxes_after_switchover.jpg

ukfree.tv Sourced - No indication that site releases as PD Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:23, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Three_multiplexes_after_switchover.jpg

ukfree.tv sourced - No indication site relases as PD Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ITV_West_new_region_boundary.png

No indication source indicated releases as PD - Not PD Self Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Luftfoto.jpg

I am not seeing anything about GFDL on the source page, but I can't read it. J Milburn (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Avidotz.jpg

Posed, web-resolution, no meta-data. Looks like a professional (military?) shot. Uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. J Milburn (talk) 15:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Belgrave Mill.jpg

Looks to be an old image, I doubt it belongs to the uploader. J Milburn (talk) 15:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Coltbrennan.jpg

Originally tagged with no source, a source has been provided but I am not seeing anything on the source page that says these images are public domain. J Milburn (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:20K Bomb.PNG

Image clearly incorporates one of the old BBC 2 logos. See, for instance, this screenshot. J Milburn (talk) 17:37, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I have replaced the background of one of the old BBC2 logos with a single black background. -- 20000 Talk/Contributions 18:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete - Still a copyvio.  Asenine  18:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
  • The image is still based on the logo. You cannot take a copyrighted image and keep modifying it until it is your own- you'll have to start again from scratch, I am afraid. J Milburn (talk) 19:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep as this has been updated with a new appearance. -- SCARFACE 20:11, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still delete until the source of the photo of the bomb is clarified. J Milburn (talk) 20:51, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PhaicTănMap.PNG

No OTRS stating that 20k is the author ("I, the copyright holder [...]") and there appears to be no PD notice on the website.  Asenine  18:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. Even if the map was created by the user, the logos and photos within the image probably do not belong to the uploader. J Milburn (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this as the geography of this fictional country seems pretty integral to the article. -- 20000 Talk/Contributions 20:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep as per above. -- SCARFACE 20:11, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Flag of Phaic Tăn.png

Depicts insignia, whether created by a user or not. See here.  Asenine  18:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. Even though this image now has a fair use rationale and the flag itself is discussed in the article, I do not feel it is particularly important, and do not feel that the information needs to be included- have any reliable sources discussed the flag? I do not feel comfortable including a non-free image just to help visualise something that isn't even discussed in any reliable sources. J Milburn (talk) 19:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SanSombrèroMap.png

No OTRS stating that 20k is the author ("I, the copyright holder [...]") and there appears to be no PD notice on the website.  Asenine  18:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete if an image of such a map could be user-created without counting as a derivative work. Otherwise, keep this as the geography of this fictional country seems pretty integral to the article. J Milburn (talk) 19:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. -- SCARFACE 20:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NSYNC.jpg

Photograph taken by Andrew Southam, not created by 20K. Source: here.  Asenine  18:56, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Very Strong Keep as this is a significant image to use on the article. -- SCARFACE 20:18, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:20K Bomb Dislike.PNG

Clearly contains part of the BBC2 logo (or former logo).  Asenine  19:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete, clearly a derivative work of a copyrighted logo. J Milburn (talk) 19:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep as I have replaced the BBC2 logo (or former logo) with my own black background and white 2. -- 20000 Talk/Contributions 20:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep as per above. -- SCARFACE 20:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still delete until the source of the bomb photo has been clarified. J Milburn (talk) 20:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still delete - Per J Milburn. Once uploader clarifies source I will be ok.  Asenine  21:03, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:BQpagesIssue2.JPG

Copyrighted magazine cover.  Asenine  21:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2008_August_11&oldid=231312267"