Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Maritime warfare task force/Iowa class battleship
This is an informal page created by TomStar81 (talk · contribs) for the purpose of organizing and managing the upcoming push of the Iowa class battleships for Featured Topic Status. It is intended as a informal setting with which to place items still needing to be addressed before the big push. You are invited to add your name to the members section below if wish to help in the push, but do note that this is strictly informal and is not intended to be, nor should this be treated as, any kind of task force or wikiproject.
Current Status
Iowa class battleships
- Major contributors: user:TomStar81, user:Bellhalla, user:MBK004, user:Maralia , user:Cla68, user:FTC Gerry, and other Ship and Military History project members
Members
Articles to be included in the push
Parenthesis indicate article's current status. Usernames in parenthesis indicate that the user is or will be working on the article.
- Template:FA Iowa class battleship (Master article)
- Template:A USS Iowa (BB-61) (undergoing post-rewrite shakedown)
- Template:FA USS New Jersey (BB-62)
- Template:FA USS Missouri (BB-63)
- Template:FA USS Wisconsin (BB-64)
- Template:FA USS Illinois (BB-65)
- Template:FA USS Kentucky (BB-66)
- Template:FA Armament of the Iowa class battleship
- Template:A United States Naval Gunfire Support debate (curently at FAC)
- USS Iowa turret explosion (adopted by Cla68)
- Radar and electronic warfare systems of the Iowa class battleship (to be written)
- Iowa class battleship conversion proposals (to be written) (MBK004)
- Currently in my sandbox: User:MBK004/Sandbox#Iowa_class_battleship_conversion_proposals
Open Tasks
- Complete the implementation of GA and A-class review suggestions for USS Iowa
- Several individual ship articles need to be put through Peer Review or FAR to ensure they meet current FA standards
- Check each individual ship template on all battleship pages for uniformity of information
- Ensure that all visual media is a uniform size within any given article
- Ensure that all reference, notes, see also, and external links section are correctly formatted and contain relevant information
Suggestions
- Should Clayton Hartwig be included in the ft push?
- I personally think Hatwig's article should be nominated for AfD and then redirected to the main article, like I did with Bud Holland article. Cla68 (talk) 02:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)