User talk:Ryulong

; Archives
	February 2006 – June 2006; July 2006; August 2006; September 2006;

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion. --Ryūlóng

For any new users or anonymous users who cannot edit this page due to actions by other users that lead to the semi-protection of this page, please leave me a message here, and I will get back to you as soon as I can. Ryūlóng 18:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Soiherdyoulike on WP:AIAV

Soiherdyoulike (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Another 4chan vandal --Ryūlóng 05:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, am I missing something? You put this user on AIAV, and this user has no (non-deleted) contributions, and their talk page is a redlink. What would be the reason that I would block this user? -- Deville (Talk) 05:11, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The name itself is a 4chan meme, and he created a redirect entitled Not funny to Ned Holness (Carlos Mencia). Ryūlóng 05:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, honestly, I have no idea what you're talking about. Are you saying he should be blocked because of an offensive username? If so, you should mention that in the AIAV notice. --- Deville (Talk) 06:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's hard to explain. Let's just say it is an offensive username. Ryūlóng 06:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of which, the redirect that was Ned Holness should now be sprotected. Ryūlóng 05:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably best to put a notice on WP:RPP then, and see what they say over there. FWIW, it doesn't look that bad to me; I've seen much more vandalized pages....:) --- Deville (Talk) 06:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Page

What on earth should I name the orignal Pokemon series season page so you don't delete it :p

I'd use something along the lines of "Pokémon (first anime series)" since it was just "Pokémon". Ryūlóng 20:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment removal

Removing other's comments is not something for you to do. Nor is it your place to put value or take value from other's comments. I was trying to lighten the mood on Sept 14 which is when that comment was placed there in the middle of a heated debate. I'll thank you to leave it be. Any futher attempts at removal will be considered vandalism. JohnnyBGood t c VIVA! 21:49, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically I would like to direct your attention to:

"Talk page vandalism Deleting the comments of other users from article Talk pages, aside from removal of internal spam, or deleting entire sections of talk pages, is generally considered vandalism. Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long Talk page to a separate file and then remove the text from the main Talk page. The above does not apply to the user's own Talk page, where users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion, except in cases of legitimate warnings, which they are generally prohibited from removing, especially where the intention of the removal is to mislead other editors."

I would say "LA LA LA LA I'M NOT LISTENING LA LA LA LA" is good enough for removal. Ryūlóng 02:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JohnnyBGood wasn't. Lucky if he didn't get a warning. Tyrenius 22:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Irene Padkowsky

If you have moment, look at Irene Padkowsky and tell me what you think. --ArmadilloFromHell 05:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. That was probably during one of my "doesn't look that bad" nights instead of a {{db-bio}} night. That and the editor who I reverted is Repmart who just seems to have a vendetta against me after I reverted his wiki-stalking at Jeremy Clarkson. I frankly don't care if this article is deleted, which is why I've listed it for speedy deletion. I should know better that people who are two years older than me and always younger than me are rarely notable. Ryūlóng 05:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flying Model Simulator

Hi. Trying to work a somewhat more detailed version that I'd done on another Wikia project into this title. Thanks for patrolling, though. :) - Lucky 6.9 06:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know; I just thought I saw your screw up. Silly admin, double redirects are for newbs. Ryūlóng 07:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ta...

...for reverting vandalism on my talk page within the same minute. That's good! Tyrenius 22:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For reverting gross vandalism on my talk page within the same minute, and all your other good work against vandals Tyrenius 22:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've lost count on how many of these I've gotten :P. Thank you, and you're welcome. Ryūlóng 23:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:64.62.191.19

I just removed this entry from WP:AIV, and failed to detect it as an open proxy, can you provide OP results to support that claim? — xaosflux ^Talk 02:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The only edit to date shows the insertion of "\'" when it should just be an apostrophe. This is extremely common in open proxies. Ryūlóng 02:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea I saw that, but ran an open proxy check, and it was inconclusive, since we indef block open proxys I'd need more to go on, if they make more bad edits please relist. thanks, — xaosflux ^Talk 03:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The "\'" thing usually gives them away. Ryūlóng 03:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship?

Have you ever considered an RfA? JoshuaZ 03:52, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but, needless to say, I might not yet be ready. Ryūlóng 03:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, again. Ryūlóng 03:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I must have missed that. It looks like reasonable concerns were raised there. If you have correct them (especially the AGF issues and being careful about you call vandalism) then I suspect in a month or two you should pass with flying colors. JoshuaZ 04:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've been working on those issues. Ryūlóng 04:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Northcentral University

Since you seem to have taken some interest in the topic you may want to see what I put on the talk page. Bert of course misintrepted it. JoshuaZ 05:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm about to list the guy for 3RR. Ryūlóng 05:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BertWoodall

I've blocked BertWoodall (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for 24 hours for vandalism, disruption, and NPA violations. Regards, alphaChimp^(talk) 05:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Damn... So that 3RR report was for naught. Ryūlóng 05:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, I watched that page and closed it. Sorry about that. Good countervandalism, btw. alphaChimp^(talk) 05:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]