User talk:AntiVandalBot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Can't sleep, clown will eat me (talk | contribs) at 16:26, 3 October 2006 (Reverted edits by 172.173.89.2 (talk) to last version by Werdnabot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

SIGN YOUR POSTS - I will not respond to unsigned posts

Click here to leave a message - don't forget to leave some shells for the big guns - (oh and no more VandalProof warnings please.....)

For information about AntiVandalBot, please read AntiVandalBot's Frequently Asked Questions

Any non civil messages may be sent straight to /dev/null (aka deleted) so please be nice. This includes all caps messages :)

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:AntiVandalBot/Jun06. Sections without timestamps are not archived


This is the talk page for discussing the AntiVandalBot anti-vandalism bot.

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.


Archives @ User talk:AntiVandalBot/archives

==It removed my name "Declan" saying that it is vandelism, how is this? i am giving an example of the name and how it is used thus my name and that i am an irish citizen - 81.101.114.111

The Link off the Danny Kaye page for "The Kid from Brooklyn" redirects to an irrelevant page. There is a phrase referring to 'The kid from brooklyn' but it has nothing to do with the movie of that title. Your bot corrected my deletion, and that was an error.

I blanked an article regarding louis xvii's sister Catherine OF Navarre, duchess of Lorraine because it erroneously redirected to Henry ii duke of Lorraine who was two centuries before her time. Please see to it that you revert the revert of your bot.

Mallory Knox

I delete it because there's already an article about mallory called mallory.w.knox.

september 11th site edit

the information I provided to that search was considered vandalism. however, the information i provided was far more fact laden that any of the lies previously posted to that search

stop!

you can't edit or take in a rolk in user pag! plcase stop it!!

Ryan Adams Article

It seems like you're reverting the Ryan Adams article back to its vandalized state since right now its showing information for Bryan Adams.

I reverted the Ryan Adams page back from the Bryan Adams info and this bot reverted it back and gave me a warning. I'm not very impressed by this bot (98% correct???). RobDe68

Unicode corruption

In this edit, AntiVandalBot seems to have corrupted the got: interwiki link during the process of reverting vandalism elsewhere on the page. The other Unicode interwiki links weren't damaged, so I'm not sure what's odd about the got: characters, but I'm guessing the script mangled them somehow. --Delirium 22:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Burning Plains

Your bot reverted my redirect. The information in the article had already been merged. The article only had two sentences of content anyways, and a big honking navigation template. See: Places in the Inheritance trilogy 132.205.44.134 01:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vampire Freaks

You don't mind keeping an eye on VampireFreaks.com, some people keep vandalizing it. - User:Xachna 9/29/06

Crystal Ray

Someone keeps vandalizing former pornstar Crystal Ray's page. I keep having to go back a revert the edits. I believe you even sided with me and reverted previous vandalism on that page earlier this month. This is IP user 200.188.xxx.xx (varies).

The big problems I have is that the person violates COPYRIGHT issues because he/she plagarizes by copying and pasting material. Furthermore, the copyright material is not a NPOV and is outdated (the user insists that she is still in porn, while she is not). See talk page for more information. Thanks for any possible help. Jbm867 02:04, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Simca esplanada

Hi, I got a message concerning an edit after a blooper of mine on the page above and need a bit of an exchange how to go about if something like this should happen again.

I issued the page on my very first day as contributor (three days ago...) and got the fist letter of "Esplanada" wrong, it wasn't capital. I then decided, after finding no way to repair this, to simply create a new page, copy the entire content over and delete the content of the page with the spelling blooper.

However you excellent anti-vandalism bot spotted my actions and acted promptly. In fact I would like to have that page deleted. Can you do that. Or should I do that myself. Hot do I do this?

sorry if I perhaps proceeded in the wrong way, all part of the learning process... :s

br --Vee8 03:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops

The bot just busted me for reverting an anon trying to replace a disambig page with an article. Is that standard, or is that a glitch? Tony Fox (arf!) 04:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bot mistake

The bot just warned me for removing this unexplained text. I removed his warning of my talk page for now. Michaelas10 12:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boss Sauce

This article is total spam. It was PRODed early on, and the creator (coincidentally named User:Bosssauce) blanked the article: [1] . AntiVandalBot diligently reverted the blanking very soon after: [2], after which the creator recreated the article. Perhaps if AVB hadn't blanked the article, we could have ended this all with a {{db-blanked}}. I don't know about Bosssauce, but I've seen other cases where new users post inappropriate articles, then blank them after getting some pushback, then get very frustrated about being "trapped" in Wikipedia process when the blanking is reverted. Would it be possible to instruct AntiVandalBot to allow blanking by the article's original creator? It seems like this might be a case where a little human discretion would be helpful. FreplySpang 17:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted legit edit

AntiVandalBot reverted this edit by me. I thought administrators were whitelisted? --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 21:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bad revert to the South Park article

Your bot reverted my edit and left a vandalism warning on my talk page. In the article for Douche and Turd, the phrase "turd sandwich" was directing to people to the articles for "feces" and "sandwich", so I redirected it to Shit sandwich for a better explanation of the phrase. These Wiki bots aren't so hot. Roland Deschain 11:04, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KFC

[3] I reverted vandalism, but was reverted by this bot ... Please check it out. BigBen212 17:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ghepeu's inferior revisions and AntiVandalBot revisions

The user "Ghepeu" does not know enough about Vesalius to be the person/author to whom the page constantly reverts. Indeed, some of the other edits have been vast improvements (in both content and English prose). I think Wikipedia would be better served by stopping this silly AntiVandalBot from making changes, especially when the changes revert mindlessly to previous inferior versions.

Just my thoughts (as a professional historian of science and academic), darin

Computer

This was a bad revert on Computer - 14:46, 30 September 2006 AntiVandalBot (Talk | contribs) m (BOT - rv Michaelas10 (talk) to last version by Bobblewik) I've redone it, so I hope it stays fixed.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AntiVandalBot&oldid=79270654"