AmiDaniel's Talk

; Archives
	27 Feb 06 – 31 Mar 06; 01 Apr 06 – 13 Apr 06; 14 Apr 06 – 25 Apr 06; 26 Apr 06 – 12 May 06; 13 May 06 – 24 May 06; 25 May 06 – 28 May 06; 29 May 06 – 1 June 06; 1 June 06 – 4 June 06; 5 June 06 – 8 June 06; 9 June 06 – 17 June 06; 18 June 06 – 22 June 06; 23 June 06 – 3 July 06; 4 July 06 – 24 Aug 06; 25 Aug 06 – 6 Oct 06;

Welcome to AmiDaniel's talk page.
To leave me a message, click here. Please sign your comments using four tildes (`~~~~`). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A descriptive header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions. Do not remove comments from others. I strongly encourage free speech on my talk page, and I will not censor messages, no matter how offensive, unless they clearly impair the page's functionality.	Talk page guidelines Please respect Etiquette, assume good faith and be nice.
If you're here because I've blocked you...
If you see the message "Autoblocked because your username has recently been used by..." it's entirely possible that this block was unintentional on my behalf. Please add {{unblock}} to your talk page along with the text of the message and your IP address or e-mail me with that information (please don't forget to include your username!), and I or someone else will work to unblock you right away.

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:AmiDaniel/Archive15. Sections without timestamps are not archived

PunkRadioCast

Hi There,

I spent over 10 hours working towards a wikipedia entry explaining our radio station, PunkRadioCast. From my understanding you have recognized it and deleted it. Would you do that to XM or Sirius? Would you delete a post about any radio station? If so why can I find them on wikipedia and why has our been deleted by you.

You can reach me at Jenna@punkradiocast.com

Plokijuhygtfrdeswaq - Lynchburg College Web Page

I would like to ask that someone monitor the article on Lynchburg College. The user 'Plokijuhygtfrdeswaq' has continually put in inaccurate information in this article. The individuals listed as "famous alumni" is not factual. Alicia Alghati did not graduate from the College. He/She has begun to list her as a former student. The people listed AREN'T FAMOUS!

The article has also been filled with speculative information:

"Most students live on campus and in nearby college-owned houses. Vernon Street, next to campus, is the most "lively" street, where almost any night students can find a party." That is not factual information! How do you measure how "lively" a street is.

If Wikipedia does not do anything about this, I plan on rallying alumni from across the country to monitor this article 24.7 to ensure accurate information is contained in it

== twat ==]]

edge hippies

we shall never forgive you for deleting edge hippies 5 months ago can we please get it back

Hi AmiDaniel

I was just looking at your page here. I fixed a little misspelling on a page about bubonic plaque, there is a lot to this stuff huh?

Sagaciousuk's vandalproof abuse

I would like to report Sagaciousuk's vandalproof abuse. I was editing the Bill Clinton page, specifically the part about his policies on terrorism. In it, I put two things: 1) a list of the things that Bill Clinton did to combat terrorism during his administration, and 2) comments made by Republicans about his policies. This is well documented on the Bill Clinton page on the site www.liberalslikechrist.org (sorry, I can't provide a direct link to the page as all pages on the site use the same URL).

Sagaciousuk used vandalproof to delete it and said that putting "nonsense" (the above two things) on a page was vandalism. I was wondering wouldn't deleting this be similar to deleting references to the New Deal on FDR's page, or any mention of the Civil War on Abraham Lincoln's page?

I was wondering if he is a Clinton hater, and does not want anything good to be said about Clinton. That's the only conclusion I can reach.

Jonathan

Apologies from Lahore WORLDCALL

Hi, my name is Ehsan Gilani I'm Network Manager for Worldcall Telecom Wireless Service. I would like to bring to your notice that 203.81.192.67 is our NAT address which is shared by thousands of our dialin customers. Any misuse is to be apologised.

regards Ehsan Gilani egilani@worldcall.net.pk

Accused of vandalism?

A bit strange, a couple of factual edits & I've been warned about vandalism? I think you are the person to contact about it...

Little Aston Park

I was wondering if you could explain why you have deleted this article.

Aghiel

hi AmiDaniel.... my name is Aghiel, I'm from Balikpapan, East Borneo, Indonesia till now, I do'nt know what is wikipedia......? I just try to see your page

VP abuse/incompetence

Re: WP:VandalProof#Abuse "If you observe anyone making questionable edits with this tool, using this tool in an edit war, or otherwise misusing the tool, please contact me immediately."

One of your users use VP for violating WP:REVERT (wholesale reversion of an edit he objects to a part thereof, and wrongly at that) as well as WP:MOSDAB and WP:FAITH, plus all due process for checking actual vandalism before reverting and suppressing content. And I'm not the only one who seem to complain about wholesale reversions, this user seem to have fun or up his edit count by preying on wikignomes -- in other words, a gun in the hands of an incompetent.

(I dunno if your documentation mentions WP:REVERT and not throwing the baby with the bathwater, but if not, it should.)

→ Complete case at User_talk:Dina#Stop_your_revert-vandalism

-- 62.147.39.202 04:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AmiDaniel: This entire thing is about one revert I made last night, with a spam0 warning. There's lots to read through to get the gist of it (on my talk page, AN/I, Afd and here), and I imagine you might not care to. However, please feel free to make any constructive criticism about my use of VP on my talk page and I will of course take it very seriously. I'd like to suggest, however, that my previous record with VP (including this contentious edit) is hardly "a gun in the hands of an incompetent". Sigh. Cheers. Dina 15:40, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Will you please revert to earlier edition Imelda Marcos. User Angeles deleted most of the older edition and wrote her own biased version. thanks.

Please

Hi again. Please revert Imelda Marcos to last edit of Genesis08 of 24 October 2006 before Angeles624 rewrote the article. thanks again.

CVU Page

I'm sorry that you consider my "nonsense" vandalism. But I don't think it is nonsense or vandalizm. It is a legitimate fact that people in the cross country team say both of these mottos during meets- I've heard them. It is a legitimate fact that the football team is bad. And it is a legitimate fact that the drama and music departments are good. I don't understand why you didn't allow that part of the page. Athletics isn't everything, you know, and just because something is funny doesn't mean it is "nonsense." Besides, this is my school. It's not like I'm from a rival school, trying to vandalize the other school's page.

Your changes to the CVU article are as pointless as what you deleted.

I was disappointed in the changes that you made to the CVU wiki article.

A cursory glance at the article shows that it doesn't have much or any substantial information about CVUHS. If you're going to make arm chair "improvements" to it you might as well delete the entire thing except the link to www.cvuhs.org.

Instead you went ahead and self righteously deleted the only thing that made the whole page worth reading. I don't know why, you probably thought you were doing a service to wikipedia. It must be a really dull world where they don't have humor = (.

I'm not looking to start an "edit war" with you over this, so I'm asking you to voluntarily return the CVU article to it's version before you changed it. Thanks!

Sir Smith 02:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Sir Smith[reply]

im sorry

it was my friend doing that it wont happen again

Imelda Marcos

Please revert the article Imelda Marcos to older edit by Genesis08 of 24 October 2006. Angeles624 rewrote the whole article. KaElin 04:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mikecraig

Thanks for the cleanup/revert by these silly anon IP people ! --Mikecraig 04:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VP Ongoing Issue

For some reason my name has been removed from the list of authorized users. I was added by Betacommand here [1], and he welcommed me here[2]. I had difficulties using it, did everything I could myself, was unable to, so I requested assistance here [3]. Instead of assistance, I was removed from the list. Because I have had difficulties on wikipedia recieving help from administrators when requested, this message is in essence a generic template I am writing on all moderators' talk pages and discussion boards in the hopes of recieving if nothing else a response - ideally, however, a solution. Thank you very much and apologies for my impatience. Gregorof/(T) 05:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof mod

I was informed previously that there was a glitch which made it so I couldn't approve users (most likely because I changed my username). Has this been fixed yet?--TBCΦtalk? 16:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Babur

You protected this page in June. I am unable to edit this page. I cannot revert vandalism by 134.173.173 to earlier version. Any help is appreciated. Siddiqui 21:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello AmiDaniel! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! 68.253.142.6 00:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Help us AmiDaniel!

As noted many times on your talk page and by many people here, we can't get into vandalproof anymore and need your help in fighting the vandals! --Daniel Olsen 17:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wizardry Dragon and VP2

I'm afraid there is mounting evidence that User:Wizardry Dragon is unable to use VP2 properly and is instead utilizing it to revert edits he disagrees with. I'm also concerned about his failure to understand what is vandalism on Wikipedia and how it's different from content disputes. Please see here, here, and here for several users, including myself, pointing out to his inappropriate reverts and vandalism accusations. Beit Or 18:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

checkuser clerk

Please check out my comments at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Clerks/Noticeboard. Thanks. Thatcher131 00:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 6th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 45	6 November 2006	About the Signpost

Arbitration election campaigns begin	Blogger studies Wikipedia appearance in search results
Intelligence wiki receives media attention	Report from the German Wikipedia
News and notes: Foundation donation, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Virtuti Militari

Hi AmiDaniel

In the talk page of Virtuti Militari I added my comment and it is titled "The idiot that is vandalising this article". One person, Reaper has replied and I'm guessing he/she might be the one who's behind it all. That's what i think after reading that person's reply. Plus the message is very similar to one of the deleted ones.

Norum 03:06 EST, 07 November 2006

History Cleaning

You missed this one in your history cleaning. Kavadi carrier 09:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know .. it slipped in there while I was completing the last history purge. Should all be cleaned up now -- hopefully that'll be the last time I have to do that :D. AmiDaniel (talk) 09:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Goetter_auf_abruf.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Goetter_auf_abruf.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Woops! Thanks OrphanBot! AmiDaniel (talk) 09:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Award

Vandal Bashing

I hereby award you this Vandal Whacking Stick for your service in defense of Virtuti Militari. In whose zealous pursuit you managed to briefly place a redlink as the frontpage link to today's featured article, an occurrence which I have never before witnessed on Wikipedia. Quite memorable. Good job beating back the vandals; keep it up. Dragons flight 10:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :D. I haven't gotten one of these in a while .. I suppose I'll have to open up User:AmiDaniel/Awards again. Glad someone thinks I did alright :). AmiDaniel (talk) 16:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spoil Sport

I hate to rain on your parade, but current policy states that we should not semi-protect the day's featured article. --Robdurbar 12:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, just re-read that and it sounds a bit arsey. I mean, well done for all the stuff you did earlier, its just that you left it to be protected for 2 hours at the end of it. --Robdurbar 15:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm well aware of the policy on sprotect; however, these were unique circumstances (note that I removed over 180 vandalistic edits from the page, many of which were committed even while semiprotected, during four separate history purges). Unfortunately, the semi-protection was absolutely vital, and it may well have been better to even full protect for a short while. It remained s-protected for suprising only two hours, considering that the vandal was still at work well over an hour into the sprotection before he tired out. I'm sorry you disagree with my decision, but frankly I don't. AmiDaniel (talk) 16:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AmiDaniels, please revert to MER-C's modification

Concerning this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CANUSA_Flag

A rather insulting part by MER-C was removed by him at my request

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MER-C#Please_restrain_yourself_from_making_fun_of_other_users

Please revert it back to what he did

Thank you

Duhman0009 13:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but archives are typically kept for historical purposes, and I do not believe it acceptable to blank it just because a remark was made that you found off-color. The only way anyone will ever arrive at that page again is by following deletion logs, which will likely only occur in the case of a DRV. Put it behind you, and move on. AmiDaniel (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Put it behind you say? Are asking me for something that you would be willing to do in the same situation, or that you wouldn't be willing to, even at your current Wikipedia user level? Duhman0009 18:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]