Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ass to mouth

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Otto4711 (talk | contribs) at 13:11, 27 December 2006 (→‎[[Ass to mouth]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Ass to mouth

Ass to mouth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This page violates WP:NEO, WP:N, and largely WP:V and probably WP:NOR. Just because a porn film or so was named "Ass to Mouth" does not make it notable enough for an article. Moreover, it has only one source to a dialog in one porn film where "Ass to mouth" is mentioned. CyberAnth 02:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, google hits are very high. This term is in common usage, it does not violate WP:NEO, WP:N or WP:NOR. A cite tag would be sifficient to cover WP:V. Mallanox 03:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It's nice to be broadminded. But there is a point where our brains fall out. This article is well beyond that boundary. Maybe should be considered for WikiPorn.  :( Student7 03:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Mallanox. To Student7, Wikipedia is not censored. We have articles on most sexual fetishes; this is pretty mild in comparison to some of them, and it _is_ an established term in the industry. Tevildo 03:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Mallanox Savant45 03:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Mallanox. It's definitely not a neologism. (Also, Clerks II is not a porn film.) —bbatsell ¿? 03:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Well-established term for a common practice in porn films, although I would prefer seeing one big article with these "porn film terms" combined, instead of a bunch of smaller ones. =Axlq 03:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete cant we make this a redirect to Anal Oral Contact or something? I know wikipedia isn't censored but.... if your making articles with titles like that, why not just officially change the names of "naughty bits" to their vulgar counterparts? It's not exactly the sort of term you would find such a thing under in sexuality or medical books now is it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TehKewl1 (talk • contribs) 03:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Medical books, no, but it is the term that's used in the porn industry, and we should reference it under its most common name. A2M and ATM aren't options, for obvious reasons - and we'd still need a redirect from the unabbreviated name. Tevildo 04:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I can't deny that I find the topic pretty sick, but it seem to satisfy Wikipedia criteria for inclusion. TSO1D 04:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Anal-oral contact. Otto4711 04:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I should point out that this practice does not involve anal-oral contact, as anyone who reads the article will discover. It's generally a good idea to read the article before offering an opinion on the AfD. Tevildo 05:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's also a good idea not to be condescending. Otto4711 13:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep notable -- Jmax- 08:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ass_to_mouth&oldid=96733869"