User talk:RafaelRGarcia

Rehnquist

I read through the whole article and agree that it is good, but I don't have the time to do the review required for Good Article status. Sorry. --CTho (talk) 05:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel Administrator MA v. Feeney

On 12 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Personnel Administrator MA v. Feeney, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 20:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some warning and advice to a newbie

I gave a "warning and advice" note to the newbie who appears to be bothering you. While you are clearly "in the right" and he's equally clearly "in the wrong", I am not sure he understands our mores such as the Big Five Rules. Thanks for your patience and understanding. :-) Bearian (talk) 18:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You were right

Nina Totenberg's response to: what about the book by that rather attractive lady reporter?

"Supreme Conflict, by ABC's Jan Crawford Greenburg, contains a fair amount of good conservative gossip about the nomination of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, but it lacks the balance, substance, and context of Toobin's book."

I guess I figured Greenhouse just changed her name. I thought she even said that when she was babbling about the Supreme Court on Lehrer a while back. Oh well.

Can you look into whether Wikipedia's failure to better accomodate my dyslexia is some kind of civil rights violation? I was wondering why Greenhouse's article got so short all of a sudden. I thought you must have deleted it all or something... what are all these voices I'm hearing???...

I still think your edits seem partisan and biased. But maybe I need a vacation.

(Wallamoose (talk) 22:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Truman and Bush approval ratings

I hope you will participate in the discussion at Talk:Harry S. Truman#Truman_and_Bush_approval_ratings. It would be good to get consensus on what the article should say about this. -- Dominus (talk) 13:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Linking and reports to WP:AIV

Hey there. Please read how to link to internal pages correctly and use this and only this way to link within Wikipedia. Also, when reporting vandals to administrator's intervention against vandalism, please follow the style given there. If you don't your reports will be regarded as comments to other reports and be deleted by the cleanup bot. Regards So Why 14:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]