User talk:Danski14
| • Click here to Start a New Thread • Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). • If you're new to Wikipedia, check out The 5 Pillars of Wikipedia, Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions to learn more about editing. |
Wikipedia Talk Page Guidelines • Respect Wikiquette • assume good faith and be nice • Bear in mind what Wikipedia is not. |
April Fools Day
Administrators allow limited vandalism today due to April Fools Day. Ask an admin. --Ineffable3000 05:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Report me if you want. But first look at Main Page and read the featured article. --Ineffable3000 05:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
My Article on J&J's Sandwich Shop
I apologize, the J&J's article was my first and as yet is not complete, the article has exiusrted for less than 24 hrs and already you put up a red flag, I protest! And also I must wonder how did you stumble upon it? --Tennekis 02:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
I see, thank you for telling me, and I apologize for not signing, as I normally just airbrush an article here and there, and as such am not used to talk pages. But rest assured I will try to assert the notability of the article.Tennekis 02:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
I see
Man, I've never seen some type so fast, kudos. But just to be sure, you want me to state explicitly why my article , about yon sandewich shp, deseves to be on wikipedia?
Tennekis 02:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks...again
If only osmosis worked with knowledge, hmm, now begins the Googleing.. I habd suspected thier were some bots prowling wikipedia, byr I wasn't sure. Tennekis 02:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
What?
What did I vandalize on, sir? The official colors for the Toronto Raptors are Purple, Black, Silver, White, and Red. Just because they don't wear purple on their jerseys doesn't mean they're not purple. They have purple on their logo, and they did NOT officially change their colors. Watch ESPN. Their name is highlighted in PURPLE PURPLE PURPLE. I'm sorry good sir, but I know a lot about this team and I know for a fact that they did not get rid of purple in their official color scheme. I repeat myself you do NOT need to wear the color in order for it to be an official color. I can name atleast 10 other teams that do this. Now please, sir, I'm sorry for my rather verbally rudeness, but I am ashamed to be called a vandalizer for something that is recocculus, respunculus, and all that mumbo jumbo. Good day to you, kind sir! 24.173.212.22 01:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Your message about Club Penguin
Hello Danski14:
I'm in receipt of your message here this evening as I came on to Wikipedia. My home/office is on a wireless system, however, I do have a child living in my house who does have a Club Penguin account. After reading your message I can assure you that I have spoken to him and his mother about the situation you messaged me about. Although he claims he didn't know what Wikipedia was, he has been instructed never to do whatever he may have done did to the Club Penguin Timeline you sent the comment about.
I recently had a issue with an article that was written which was just straighten out with Wikipedia and I can assure you this was not by my hand on my computer. The boy's Club Penguin account will now be canceled due to his troubled past with this service. This is not the first time I received something like this as Club Penguin themselves wrote me about his account once before.
Please accept my apologies for any distrubance in the page you mentioned and know that I am dealing with the child and his actions which lead to you post your message to my IP address.
Sincerely,
Rick Tugman. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.229.130.101 (talk) 02:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
What?
I'm sorry myself, and I will consider making an account in the future. Toronto Raptors are still purple, but people change it, and it's kind of annoying, considering I like the Raptor's unique colors. It just gets to me, for some odd reason. Thank you, Danski, I accept any apologies. Adios! 24.173.212.22 02:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive
Thank you for your contributions! -- WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive 16:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
| File:WMBarnstar.jpeg | The Working Man's Barnstar | |
| For your tireless and endless efforts in assessing biography articles, WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive hereby awards you The Working Man's Barnstar. 16:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC) |
| File:Barnstar.jpeg | The Original Barnstar | |
| In recognize of your particularly fine contributions in assessing biography articles, WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive hereby awards you The Original Barnstar.16:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC) |
| File:Goldenwiki 2.jpeg | The Golden Wiki Award | |
| For your exceptional contributions to the WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive, WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive hereby awards you The Golden Wiki Award. 16:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC) |
your response to my comment on notability
I don't know how this works but how am I not being neutral? And what would be un neutral it is not like i am going on and on about how cool and remarkable it is I am stated the facts in a very complete manner and doing a good job at telling the story, so I think my pov is fine. And if the case of it being deleted is the pov couldn't I get someone else to write problem solved right? Well no the issue isn't the pov, at least it wasn't it was the notability or that is what I was told. Thank you for trying to help. TheMaleSeahorse 22:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
my page
sorry if i came off being rude. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheMaleSeahorse (talk • contribs) 22:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
I wasn't vandilizing..?
H-hey, you gave me a warning for vandilizing when I was removing an enormous chunk of vandilization from the 'Leet' page. What gives?Kamon137 01:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Well...
I got a message directed towards my IP address, as I don't believe I had registered for Wikipedia until moments later. However, what you said may have been the case. Either way, thanks for responding to me. Kamon137 01:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
April 2007
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as This page is empty, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Danski14(talk) 19:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Really? That's a little bit mean isn't it?--A rather good user 19:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps. But re-creation after deletion by an admin is considered vandalism in most cases. The proper process is to bring it through deletion review. Danski14(talk) 19:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok I'm sorry. I won't do it again. Thanks anyway--A rather good user 19:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- It might make a good page at uncyclopedia however. Danski14(talk) 19:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok then! :)--A rather good user 19:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
hi
well,i don't understand why my biographie wasn't accepted could i know the reason's and haw can i delete my account
salut
excuse me but i'm new and i don't unterstand the way that work's wikipedia how!!!!!!!!!!!
thank's
thank you very much , and i saw the welcome page and well.it helped me a lot anyways bye aurevoir —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Afghashaz (talk • contribs) 21:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC).
hi
hi, i would like to know why can't i do an biographical article about shazada kawkab yunus.merci
A question about edit counts
How do you find your edit count? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tennekis (talk • contribs) 05:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC).
Thanks
Dude, you spend waaaay to much time on wikipedia Tennekis 05:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
bonjour
hi well anyways thank's aurevoir —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Afghashaz (talk • contribs) 15:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC).
Vandalism
Nuclear froggy 20:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC) Just came across some vandalism on this article Smelly. Nuclear froggy 20:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC) Yes I'm back! Just looking at the article Smelly (no I'm not obsessed with it) and I think you or some other moderator should disable editing for unregistered or newly registered users, I'm sure there this would stop most vandalism on this page and we won't have to keep reverting. Thanks.
Vandal User:Gpuollockca1965
You may like to be aware that the above listed user committed some more blatant vandalism on the page Worku Tesfamichael. I do not know what the procedure is but since you commented on his vandalism before I would ask you to take action in the appropriate manner. Thank you! --Merhawie 21:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: Ronald Collé
I honestly don't remember exactly why I removed the notability template, but I think it was the discussion on the talk page and the discussion on the AfD. Apparently he is notable due to his position and works published. (WP:PROF is pretty open to these kind of bios). But you bring up a good point: there might just not be enough published information available to make an accurate article, especially where WP:BLP is concerned. Someone did mention some sources "who's who" on the talk page, but they do not look accessible. Hopefully someone will find something. Oh, and feel free to re-add the notability template if you want. It might encourage other editors to try to improve it. I won't remove it. Danski14(talk) 00:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I put it back. If nothing has changed in a month, I think it'll be time to run it through AfD again. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 01:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- I renominated it, but WP:V doesn't seem to matter. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 04:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
sorry. my cousin told me about that and i thought it might be true.
thank you
Hello, Danski14. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Holy Tech.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Danski14/misc. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Undone your reversion to Newcastle University Union Society - not actually vandalism
Just to let you know I've just undone the revert on Newcastle University Union Society which you did on 17/5/07. I'm afraid you incorrectly identified the posts in question as vandalism when they actually were factually correct. Please see www.unionsociety.co.uk to corroborate if needed. I understand the user in question (128.240.229.65) had been involved in some vandalism of other subjects, but this is a shared IP address.
going around and blaming people for vandalism that isn't even shown is called fascism you sorry soul ````