User talk:ANNAfoxlover

ANNAfoxlover is currently experiencing computer problems and may not respond quickly to queries

edit count | edit summary usage

Welcome!

Hello, ANNAfoxlover, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 03:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Sean's signature page

I'm very familiar with Sean's signature page. He's known for having pumped out signatures in gross violation of WP:SIG. Whether or not he does that now, I don't know. My point is, if you've been told your signature is far too long and you've had to go to someone else and request a new one, you're totally missing the point. If you can't understand what the difference between a bad sig and a good sig is, go to Special:Preferences, put the word ANNAfoxlover in the signature box, and turn off raw sig, and it'll look just like mine is now, with your name. Problem solved. --Deskana 21:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

I will do that for now, but I would like a signature that is more friendly, but not too complicated, like some sigs I've been through. I want to see if he can do it. He's given out some great sigs, but some of his early ones were pretty bad. I hope he can do it for me, and if not, I'll come up with a simple sig as soon as possible. Thank you for your advice. ;-) ANNAfoxlover 18:49, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Well if you want a better signature, take the code from mine, turn raw signature off, and alter the links. Signatures are for identification. That you're spending time considering your signature is a gross violation of the spirit of WP:SIG. --Deskana (talk) 19:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I understand what you're saying, and I know I used to have some horibble signatures when I was not such a good Wikipedian, but I'm just trying to find a simple, friendly signature now, that follows WP:SIG, but if I keep going then my computer might crash, so thank you for the advice! BTW, I am trying to find another repair guy to do it. Bye! ;-) ANNAfoxlover 19:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I so happen to be taking a degree in Computer Science. What's wrong with your computer? What happens when it crashes? What error messages are displayed? --Deskana (talk) 19:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Nothing happens. It shut shuts down. No error messages or anything. Just goes black and you can't turn it on again until after maybe 5 minutes. ANNAfoxlover 23:23, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

That's interesting. It happens after it's been turned on a while? Perhaps you should ask someone with the know-how to check that your fans are still running. It could be overheating if it's just turning off on its own. --Deskana (talk) 23:49, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I told you I am taking it in for repairs sometime soon. BTW, this is an encyclopedia, not a computer support task site. ;-) ANNAfoxlover 23:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry I showed any concern then. I'm apologise for trying to save you money. --Deskana (talk) 00:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Admin coaches give free computer advice?! I must be bad at my job :-p Ryan Postlethwaite 00:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

LOL ANNAfoxlover 16:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm really a sock puppet of the person I'm trying to get banned...

Why on earth did you list me as a sock puppet of the user I'm trying to report? Now I can't even add his name on the blocking list because a load of crap comes up saying I'm a suspected sock puppet. I've had all these problems before from users in my school, so here's the full story once again:

There was three of us. Me, a friend (who prefers if I did not list his username), and a vandal, who all used Wikipedia from school, and so our IP addresses appeared to be the same. That vandal was User:Sonic Shadow Silver, who has since been blocked along with all of his sock puppets. I reported all of this to User:DBZROCKS, who cleared everything up and got the vandal blocked. User:Night-Ryu is another friend of mine from school who popped up later. He seems to use Wikipedia quite sensibly. Then there's the vandal who I'm now trying to get banned, and there's no chance of him committing sensibly to Wikipedia and all he's doing is vandalising our user pages because he doesn't get along with us in RL. And quick note that the IP I'm using now is different because I'm at home. I'm trying to get the admins to block the school IP completely, so that not even the unblocked users can edit from school. It will save Wikipedia from a lot of vandals if you just give me a chance to report it.

Silver Fang 13:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Blocking an entire school's IP is not reasonable, but I can see your point. I guess you got blocked because of vandalism. Don't think it's my fault that you got blocked. I just put a few templates on your userpage. Why is this my fault? ANNAfoxlover 20:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

It looked like you did not vandalize Wikipedia, but you have shared may too much personal information about many people whom you have a bad relationship with, n00b. It turns out that Wikipedia is not a place for you to threaten to beat up people. I really want you to stay on Wikipedia, but before I do, please stop giving personal attacks to many users. If you promise to stop doing this, you will probably be unblocked. Do you promise to stop saying these things to people? ANNAfoxlover 21:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

My comments on an autograph page

Um, I'm sorry if I wasn't clear, but my whole comment was teasing. Don't you see that I said I would never sign an autograph page, and then I went ahead and signed it? See paradox or self-reference. Regards, Newyorkbrad 01:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Re longest autograph book

The longest autograph book is really for trying to collect signatures. It is there to collect a large amount of signatures. Bernstein2291 01:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I will change the description but i will not move the page. Bernstein2291 01:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I will move the page, remove it from the Department of Fun, and change all links to it. Bernstein2291 19:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

The longest autograph page

I find your objections to the "longest autograph page" quite ironic. You tell him/her that the whole point is to collect signatures from friendly Wikipedians, not to have the most signatures ever. Yet your own autograph page states this:

I'm ANNAfoxlover, and I want to collect signatures of every Wikipedian, especially Kamope, HighInBC, RMS Oceanic, and, the signature I REALLY want...JIMBO WALES!!!.

So, what's so different? Your whole goal is to get a signature of every Wikipedian which would make it the longest, wouldn't it? Also, you have goals to get particular users to sign it, which is missing the point according to yourself. Metros 01:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I didn't know I still had that on my autograph page. I haven't updated or looked at the page recently. ANNAfoxlover 01:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you so much for the great barnstar, If you would happen to have any question I'll be more than happy to answer, again thank you my friend, Take Care:)Arnon Chaffin (Talk) 12:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Edna Mole is the best!

so the discussion page is to suggest ways of improving the article, i dont see how suggesting that Edna is a transexual would improve the article, that point was just as pointless as mine (i think). okay heres a suggestion, please dont freak out over how amazing Edna Mole is, its really not worth it, you are so below her, accept this.

okay sorry, its just that i love her... sorry ill stop now. bye.

Upcoming Pixar

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Upcoming Pixar, by Kwsn, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Upcoming Pixar fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

appears to be a non-official blog, falls under A7

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Upcoming Pixar, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Upcoming Pixar itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:40, 13 June 2007 (UTC)