Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sam Spade (talk | contribs)
blub adding reference to Mediation (2005)
Line 9: Line 9:
We are the '''[[Mediation]] [[cabal]]''', or maybe we're not, you never know, perhaps there ''is'' no such thing. You never know with cabals now, do you?
We are the '''[[Mediation]] [[cabal]]''', or maybe we're not, you never know, perhaps there ''is'' no such thing. You never know with cabals now, do you?


Even so, a lot of people who do informal mediation happen to have this page on their watchlists.
Even so, a lot of people who do informal mediation happen to have this page on their watchlists. The Mediation Cabal is intended to be the alpha implementation of the [[Wikipedia:Mediation (2005)]] informal mediation proposal.


If you just wonder if the person you're talking to is sane, if things are starting to get hot but haven't yet exploded, you know, small stuff you'd just like some advice on before it blossoms into actual trouble (hopefully!) , drop a note here, and a friendly mediator-ish person will likely stop by to help!
If you just wonder if the person you're talking to is sane, if things are starting to get hot but haven't yet exploded, you know, small stuff you'd just like some advice on before it blossoms into actual trouble (hopefully!) , drop a note here, and a friendly mediator-ish person will likely stop by to help!

Revision as of 00:48, 10 May 2005

We are the Mediation cabal, or maybe we're not, you never know, perhaps there is no such thing. You never know with cabals now, do you?

Even so, a lot of people who do informal mediation happen to have this page on their watchlists. The Mediation Cabal is intended to be the alpha implementation of the Wikipedia:Mediation (2005) informal mediation proposal.

If you just wonder if the person you're talking to is sane, if things are starting to get hot but haven't yet exploded, you know, small stuff you'd just like some advice on before it blossoms into actual trouble (hopefully!) , drop a note here, and a friendly mediator-ish person will likely stop by to help!

(Tip: You're probably posting here to try and get someone to Not Be Angry At You. It helps to try to put things in as neutral terms as possible here, and make it possible to contact you by e-mail or irc, that way the other person is less likely to feel hurt. :-) )

Who's involved?
Everyking is involved
What's going on?
He seems to attack everything I say, due to his complaints about my "attitude." His criticisms are explicitly not based on evidence, and he hasn't really clarified what I've done that is abusive, making discussion difficult.
What would you like to change about that?
Its existence.
If you'd prefer we work discreetly, how can we reach you?
I'm on IRC often.

Snowspinner 02:09, May 9, 2005 (UTC)

Wgfinley got Snowspinner and Everyking talking together, and likely this means we can end the arbitration committee action! Yay! :-) Kim Bruning 21:35, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Who's involved?
Snowspinner and Mirv
What's going on?
From the outside, it looks like a sibling of the Snowspinner/EK conflict.
What would you like to change about that?
I'd love to see it cool down if possible before one or both knock on the Arb Com's door.
If you'd prefer we work discreetly, how can we reach you?
Who, me? :-) Snowspinner is on IRC a lot; Mirv I have no idea.

- David Gerard 21:08, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Who's involved?
User:Sam Spade and User:Cberlet
What's going on?
We both think the other is POV, and he is grumpy.
Or, from Chip's point of view, Sam makes edits without providing proper cites, and thinks trashing the left is NPOV  :-) --Cberlet 22:45, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently "proper" means anything left of the ACLU.
What would you like to change about that?
Less grumpy, more NPOV
More cites, less reversions --Cberlet 22:45, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I cite plenty, he just doesn't like em. he cites plenty, but I don't care how many cites you have, you can't put POV in the narrative. Chips an editorial alt. press journalist, so its 2nd nature to him.
If you'd prefer we work discreetly, how can we reach you?
anywhere you like, see User:Sam_Spade/Info or my talk page or whatever. Sam Spade 21:56, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template: page where things are up

Who's involved?
...
What's going on?
...
What would you like to change about that?
...
If you'd prefer we work discreetly, how can we reach you?
...

See also: Wikipedia:Mediation (2005)