Hugues Lebailly: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
His publications include: |
His publications include: |
||
*'Dr Dodgson et Mr Carroll: de la caricature au portrait.' ('Dr. Dodgson and Mr. Carroll: from |
*'Dr Dodgson et Mr Carroll: de la caricature au portrait.' ('Dr. Dodgson and Mr. Carroll: from Caricature to Portrait.') ''Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens'' n° 43, April 1996, Presses Universitaires de Montpellier. |
||
*'The Powerful and the Sweet:dialectique du masculin et du féminin dans la critique d'art victorienne'. ('The Dialectics of Masculinity and Femininity in Victorian Art Criticism.') ''Masculin/Féminin, Littératures et cultures anglo-saxonnes'', proceedings of the 38th Congress of the S.A.E.S. Presses Universitaires de Rennes, May 1999 (pp. 151-163). |
*'The Powerful and the Sweet:dialectique du masculin et du féminin dans la critique d'art victorienne'. ('The Dialectics of Masculinity and Femininity in Victorian Art Criticism.') ''Masculin/Féminin, Littératures et cultures anglo-saxonnes'', proceedings of the 38th Congress of the S.A.E.S. Presses Universitaires de Rennes, May 1999 (pp. 151-163). |
||
*'Ordering disorder: la fonction normative de la critique d'art victorienne.' ('Ordering Disorder: the |
*'Ordering disorder: la fonction normative de la critique d'art victorienne.' ('Ordering Disorder: the Normative Function of Victorian Art Criticism.') ''Littérature et Ordre Social'', proceedings of the second International Congress of the University of Le Havre, headed by Jean-Paul Barbiche: Paris, l'Harmattan, 1999 (pp. 73-83). |
||
*'C. L. Dodgson and the Victorian Cult of the Child', ''The Carrollian'', The Lewis Carroll Journal n° 4, autumn 1999 (pp. 3-31). |
*'C. L. Dodgson and the Victorian Cult of the Child', ''The Carrollian'', The Lewis Carroll Journal n° 4, autumn 1999 (pp. 3-31). |
||
*[http://contrariwise.wild-reality.net/distort.html Through a Distorting Looking-Glass: Charles Lutwidge Dodgson's artistic interests as mirrored in his nieces' edited version of his diaries'] |
*[http://contrariwise.wild-reality.net/distort.html Through a Distorting Looking-Glass: Charles Lutwidge Dodgson's artistic interests as mirrored in his nieces' edited version of his diaries'] |
Revision as of 15:48, 22 February 2010
Hugues Lebailly is a French academic and Senior Lecturer in English Cultural Studies at the Sorbonne. He is known for his work on nineteenth-century English literature, particularly his studies of Lewis Carroll which, in combination with the work of Karoline Leach and others, have begun a reassessment of Carroll's life and personality. His work on Carroll's place within what he has termed the "Victorian Child-Cult" has helped shape a new understanding of the man's sexuality and his artistry.[1]
His publications include:
- 'Dr Dodgson et Mr Carroll: de la caricature au portrait.' ('Dr. Dodgson and Mr. Carroll: from Caricature to Portrait.') Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens n° 43, April 1996, Presses Universitaires de Montpellier.
- 'The Powerful and the Sweet:dialectique du masculin et du féminin dans la critique d'art victorienne'. ('The Dialectics of Masculinity and Femininity in Victorian Art Criticism.') Masculin/Féminin, Littératures et cultures anglo-saxonnes, proceedings of the 38th Congress of the S.A.E.S. Presses Universitaires de Rennes, May 1999 (pp. 151-163).
- 'Ordering disorder: la fonction normative de la critique d'art victorienne.' ('Ordering Disorder: the Normative Function of Victorian Art Criticism.') Littérature et Ordre Social, proceedings of the second International Congress of the University of Le Havre, headed by Jean-Paul Barbiche: Paris, l'Harmattan, 1999 (pp. 73-83).
- 'C. L. Dodgson and the Victorian Cult of the Child', The Carrollian, The Lewis Carroll Journal n° 4, autumn 1999 (pp. 3-31).
- Through a Distorting Looking-Glass: Charles Lutwidge Dodgson's artistic interests as mirrored in his nieces' edited version of his diaries'
- Charles Lutwidge Dodgson's relationship with the weaker and more aesthetic sex re-examined