User talk:Megapen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Megapen (talk | contribs) at 22:30, 9 October 2008 (→‎TEST). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Possibly unfree Image:Skin Book.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Skin Book.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Genisock2 (talk) 16:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Genisock2 (talk) 16:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:BOOK DERM.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BOOK DERM.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Danseymour.png

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Danseymour.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Genisock2 (talk) 16:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Pope & Agca.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pope & Agca.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/April 2008#Megapen. RFRBot (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Hi, I got your message.

By the way, I'm a PC-user and I have no idea what "Mac-style" means. But the most important part of a user page is what you tell everyone about yourself. So toward that end, I've thrown something up on your user page that you can start filling in, editing, and playing around with. In addition to the content, you can change the colors, the border thickness, etc., until it's something unique to you.

If you need help with anything specific, please let me know and I'll drop by.

Glad to meetchya,

The Transhumanist    17:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

State Limousines of England

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of State Limousines of England, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wikicars.org/en/State_Limousines_of_England. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:00, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UN offensive

Your article is great, however the title UN Offensive could refer to any offensive by the United Nations in the past 60 years. I'm going to leave your article alone, but I suggest moving it to something with a much more specific title. Thanks for listening. Czolgolz (talk) 20:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm surprised no one has written an article about this important battle. With a more specific title, some wikilinks and sources, this could be a fine article. Czolgolz (talk) 20:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added wikilinks and linked to this article from the Korean war article. I'd appreciate feedback. Czolgolz (talk) 16:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Er, I don't know what a barnstar is, but I'd be happy to give you one. Czolgolz (talk) 20:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Writer's Barnstar
a star for the offensive article you wrote Czolgolz (talk) 07:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help

Sorry for the delay - I've taken a look at your contributions, and I can't see that you've had much experience in dealing with vandalism yet. Take some time learning the ropes manually first - since rollback is intended to be used only for cases of obvious vandalism, I'd like to see that you know what you're getting into first. I noticed that you'd also been declined rollback fairly recently, presumably for the same reason. Do some manual reversions for a while, and come back when you've got some experience. Happy editing! Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits Re

OK, unfortunately I can't delete the IP talk again (I posted the first message) so if you wish to have it completely deleted you need to contact an administrator. Make sure you log in especially when editing your userspace and even more especially when you're making a big edit like blanking a user page, to us it appears like a pissed off vandal, thanks. The DominatorTalkEdits 23:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: I found your hidden page

I'm sorry, but that's not it. That's the challenge page, telling you that I have the page. Keep looking, I know you'll find it! Again, I'm sorry. Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours 18:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Hidden Barnstar
This user has found Basketball110's secret hidden sub page! Can you find it?
Really bad barnstar, right? :) Basketball110 My story/Tell me yours 18:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link

http://wiki.xyrael.net/w/index.php?title=User:Megapen&action=edit --Megapen (talk) 20:22, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:mastereditor

Thank you for the note! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Aleena's RfA

Megapen...Thank you for supporting my nomination for adminship. Through it I have become aware of a great many people who can help me in my future editing endeavors. Even though I was not promoted, your support shows that I still have something to contribute to Wikipedia, even if it is minor edits to fix spelling and grammar to working in WikiProjects to help others make great articles. If you wish to further discuss the nomination, please use its talk page. Stop by my talk page anytime, even if it is just to say hello. Have a wonderful day! - LA @ 04:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle?

Hi Megapen, sorry to bother you, but I saw your post on the Twinkle page and I'm having the same problem. I see you finally got Twinkle working; how'd you fix it? Thanks! FCSundae (talk) 18:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chaaaaaa!

When an article falls under the criteria for speedy deletion, there's no need to go through the AfD process. Just tag it with a CSD template and an admin will be along to delete it. — Gwalla | Talk 19:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Lewis (character)

Hi. Why did you revert my edit to Bill Lewis (character)? According to WP:SOAPS guidelines this sections should not be in soap operas characters articles. I am copying from there: To keep articles visually appealing and manageable, relationships should be "listed" only in the infobox. (bold in the original!). -- Magioladitis (talk) 02:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit. I hope there is no problem with that. If you still think I am wrong, please revert my edit and we can discuss it. -- Magioladitis (talk) 02:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emancipation Act

Hi, I redirected the Emancipation Act article to the Slavery Abolition Act 1833 article which covers the act, although now that I think about it. there may be a case for a disambiguation page at the Emancipation Act article. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 02:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use machine translation

I appreciate your attempts to translate articles from pl wiki, but it is evident you are using a machine translation; the resulting articles are close to incomprehensible mess. Please do not translate them unless you are certain you can copyedit them into something meaningful. Thanks, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 04:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Szlachta wiki

Thanks for the info about this, but I don't think there is much about szlachta that cannot go on the English Wikipedia? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of detailed info cannot be added to Wikipedia? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MOR Music - York, UK

Hi Megapen, I see you recently created the article MOR Music - York, UK, with maintenance tags but no content. As it was deleted shorty before this, I presume that was a mistake. Were you planning on writing an article there, or should it be deleted again? I would have already tagged it for speedy deletion, as there is no content, but just wanted to check in case you were about to add something to it. Thanks, --BelovedFreak 19:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

tropical garden

Your recent addition of wikilinks to the tropical garden article have been reverted because they were completely off-topic. If your using a bot or similar tool please verify the suggestions are appropriate before saving the changes. I haven't checked your other recent edits with the link suggesting tool, if you could do so and correct any mistakes it would be good. - Shiftchange (talk) 01:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Harlan

You didn't provide a reason for deletion in this AfD. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPP suggestions

First, let me say that I'm glad you're so enthusiastic about new page patrol, but I'd like to offer a couple of (hopefully) helpful suggestions.

If you're going to nominate an article for deletion, such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Harlan, please give a reason for deletion instead of making people guess. Unless it's an article of the type "Jason is ugly hahahahaha", it's usually best to wait a short while before nominating for deletion. Most new contributors aren't familiar with article writing, and it may take them several edits over a couple of hours to get down what they want to say.

Also, when you're tagging new articles with Friendly, please take a minute to think about the tags you're applying. This diff, for example, has several tags that don't apply or duplicate each other. Cleanup and copyedit are essentially the same for this article, and there's really nothing confusing, essay-like, or that needs expert attention in it.

Thanks! --Fabrictramp (talk) 20:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar! I really appreciate it. Cheers! - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 18:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Diligent Terrier/Barnstar

Reply: Barnstar

You're very welcome. Let me know if you want me to adopt you through the adopt-a-user program. Cheers! - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 19:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nominations

When you do AfD nominations, be sure to provide a reason for deletion, rather than simply listing it. It's very important that you state why the article should be deleted, or if you are listing it for some other reason (i.e. if you were completing the AfD on behalf of an anonymous user). Your reason doesn't have to be long (though elaborate if possible to provide context). See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Sandler for an example of an AfD where a reason was provided. Thanks for your contributions! nneonneo talk 01:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Fish

It's a stub, and I will fill in more information tomorrow. I'd appreciate it if you would not put it up for deletion two minutes after I added it. Thanks. Larry Dunn (talk) 22:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elystan Glodrydd

Would you please reconsider your tags on the above article: it is not unreferenced; if it needs copy-editing, why do you not do it? I may not be the most expert, but I do know how to use the sources which I HAVE CITED. You claim to be new user. Is this a case of "fools rush in where angels fear to tread"? Peterkingiron (talk) 22:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Amiel

Hello - this is a new stub - it was created eight minutes before you slapped cleanup, notability and reference tags on it. This is premature and uncalled for. Stubs by definition need expansion - give it a chance to be expanded. Tvoz/talk 02:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Invite

Thanks for the invitation! Let me know if you need any help recruiting users. Thanks again! - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 20:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a list of users you want to recruit? - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 21:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are categories for that sort of thing ... and also WikiProject Politics, WikiProject United States presidential elections ... just let me know. - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 21:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you get that list from? - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 22:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

project

Hi. I recently joined the Political Parties wikiproject, I understood it was open for participation. Would you like me to send out invites to some other users that I know are interested in political parties? --Soman (talk) 16:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestions; User:Nightstallion, User:Everyking, User:Checco, User:C mon, User:Relata refero, User:Sesel, User:Oddeivind, User:Warofdreams, User:Electionworld. --Soman (talk) 16:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Grateful

Sorry I have been extremely busy lately and am not making Wikipedia ads at this time :(. Try asking User:Andrew Hampe, last I knew, he also makes ads for the project.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that. He is also no longer available.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lepus Carnivorus

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lepus Carnivorus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:47, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Political Parties..?

A (very) draft discussion on the policy on political parties has been started by me here - User:Doktorbuk/pp. If you can assist with this discussion, or know how to help me get this policy looked at, advanced, and accepted by the larger Wiki community, please let me know. Many thanks doktorb wordsdeeds 19:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikipedia:WikiProject Political Parties/Collaboration/June 2008

You can nominate more than one article, but I don't think you can vote for both. - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 16:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

American conservative

Your userboxes are great! Someday I will steal some of them from you... problems? I am also pro-life and was a supporter of Huckabee, before he quit, even if I always liked John McCain. I dream a McCain-Huckabee ticket: do you think is it possible? Who will be McCain's VP choice in the end? Is Obama beatable? Here it seems yes. Unfortunately I come from Veneto and I cannot vote... --Checco (talk) 16:07, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No answers to my questions...
Thank you for the barnstar (or is it a joke?): it is my first one! --Checco (talk) 16:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was also delighted to see the McCain-Huckabee userbox I created on your userbox page. - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 16:17, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We are discussing about McCain's choice for VP at Diligent Terrier's talk page... --Checco (talk) 17:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Sorry, didn't realize until you pointed it out.

The Environmental Barnstar
Awarded for support in WikiProject Environment. OhanaUnitedTalk page 16:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done

 Done I have signed up for your Wikiproject (see award center).--LAAFan 18:18, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject: Political Parties template

Hi, I tried to help out with the task you listed at the award center, but the template doesn't seem to work if the article hasn't been assessed. See Talk:Reform Party of British Columbia – the template shows up, but it also gives a bunch of coding afterward. GaryColemanFan (talk) 19:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Well, I don't feel comfortable doing assessments for a project that I don't belong to, so I'll leave the tagging to project members. At any rate, I recommend looking into the coding of your template, as it clearly needs to be fixed. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RickK Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
This barnstar is hereby awarded to Megapen for his/her constructive anti-vandalism work on Wikipedia -- Freshbakedpie (Wanna talk?) \'_'/ 22:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]



This is to show that your edits are seen and apprecitated. Keep up the good work!-- Freshbakedpie (Wanna talk?) \'_'/ 22:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure!

You're in, just remember you can be subjected to embarassing acts BUT you cannot be killed. If you wanna be in it tell me on MY Talk page.--Editor510 (talk) 18:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, forget that, you're in!--Editor510 (talk) 16:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yo

Would appreciate you making good on your offer here - [1] - not planning on officially joining the project, but I did tag 40 articles.
Cheers. JaakobouChalk Talk 12:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you so much for the award! I really appreciate it. Hope all is well, and let's continue our hard work on WikiProject Political Parties. Cheers! - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 22:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me as well. I believe I've now got every Canadian political party tagged for your project. It was pretty eye opening for me, as I had no idea there were that many parties. GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HOORAY 4 U!

Dear Megapen,
You are lucky enough to have found a golden barnstar in one of my flavoured userboxes. I hope you enjoyed it. I certainly enjoy them. You will come to my factory at exactly 9:00 a.m. on the 31th-or is it 31st? I always forget-to see what it is like to make these wonderful boxes.

Til then,

Editor510

Barnstar challenge

Hello. As I noted on the Awards Center site, I just completed your challenge. Also (and not to be too picky) you have promised those who meet your challenge a barnstar but have been awarding "awards". I know the difference may seem trivial, but I work on WP:WikiProject Awards and the difference is significant. For a barnstar for this type of challenge, you might consider the WikiProject Barnstar or the Society Barnstar (which topically covers political articles). Anyway, I'll be grateful for your generosity either way but just wanted to make you aware. Thanks! --Eustress (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright...

Megapen, your time on the wikistory has come, follow the link:

Your scene!

Enjoy!--Editor510 drop us a line, mate 19:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put you on hold. When you get back tell me!--Editor510 drop us a line, mate 16:02, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, Megapen!

Ok,you need to know this: The edits allowed for actors is now 5 edits. Three is a bit unfair, I thought. Now for some randomosity.

WIGGIDY WIGGIDY WACK

FLIP FLAP

CLAP TRAP

BLERRRRRJ!

MEHHHHHHHHHH!

FORTHEWIN=FTWN00B

That's better. ;-)=)--Editor510 drop us a line, mate 19:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiPolitics

Would you be interested in writing for the WikiPolitics blog? Let me know. :) - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 20:36, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Introducing WikiProject United States Government...

Hello Megapen,

Are you interested in Politics, Law or the United States? Do you enjoy expanding, creating or maintaining articles relating to those subjects? Or do you enjoy the small stuff? Or maybe you like learning about the United States Congress or the Commander in Chief.

Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying.

Thanks in advance, « Diligent Terrier Bot (talk) 22:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC) [reply]


This message has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot on behalf of WikiProject United States Government.
You have received it because you are a member of a related WikiProject or you have said you are interested in your userspace.
Message written by Leonard^Bloom and Diligent Terrier.

Help us get the project off the ground and flying.

Proposed deletion of Thomas Stevens (politician)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thomas Stevens (politician), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TallNapoleon (talk) 23:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Deleting of Info from Pitchfork's Article

Deleting an exhaustive list of albums that have earned a 9.9, 9.8, 9.7, etc from the Pitchfork article is in no way vandalism. Those sections are unnecessary, and are little more than advertising for Pitchfork. You may feel free to disagree, but to claim "vandalism" is ridiculous.158.81.13.145 (talk) 18:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Obama-Ayers controversy

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Obama-Ayers controversy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GrszX 20:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Extenal links

Before engaging in further disruptive editing, please read WP:EL, and in particular read WP:LINKSTOAVOID. You have been repeatedly adding inappropriate links (without explanation), even after it has been clearly explained to you why they are inappropriate. If your edits are removed by multiple editors and you still want to add the same material, please discuss it on the talk page first. Thanks! --Loonymonkey (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of American Issues Project

A tag has been placed on American Issues Project, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Matthew Glennon(Talk to me) 00:04, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Thomas Stevens (politician)

I have nominated Thomas Stevens (politician), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Stevens (politician). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TallNapoleon (talk) 01:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC) TallNapoleon (talk) 01:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TEST

On October 9, 2008 the Republican National Committee launched the first ad[1] questioning Bill Ayers possible ties to Barack Obama. It was followed by the McCain Campaign launching of an ad on 10.09.08. The ad calls Senator Obam "Too dangerous for America".[2] [3] It asks "Barack Obama and domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. Friends. They’ve worked together for years. But Obama tries to hide it. Why?" [4] and goes on to say "Obama launched his political career in Ayers’ living room. Ayers and Obama ran a radical “education” foundation, together. They wrote the foundation’s by-laws, together. Obama was the foundation’s first chairman. Reports say they, “distributed more than $100 million to ideological allies with no discernible improvement in education.”[5]

  1. ^ http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/10/rnc_uses_ayers_in_new_ads.html
  2. ^ http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Multimedia/Player.aspx?GUID=9A48C156-AD6A-40BD-9381-98DDF66EC77A
  3. ^ http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Multimedia/Player.aspx?GUID=9A48C156-AD6A-40BD-9381-98DDF66EC77A
  4. ^ http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Multimedia/Player.aspx?GUID=9A48C156-AD6A-40BD-9381-98DDF66EC77A
  5. ^ http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Multimedia/Player.aspx?GUID=9A48C156-AD6A-40BD-9381-98DDF66EC77A
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Megapen&oldid=244238756"