Talk:Scouting in Aberdeen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bduke (talk | contribs) at 03:05, 20 September 2008 (class NA now redirect). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconScouting Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconScouting in Aberdeen is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconScotland NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I am inclined to leave this article for now. The issue of sourcing the history that I raised on Talk:Templars' Park Scout Campsite needs to be addressed as it may be a copyvio. If it is, then I support merge. If it is not, this is an interesting article on an important Scout Camp Site. --Bduke 22:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose merge. --evrik (talk) 17:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose merge - there's a lot of information in the campsite article which wouldn't really be well placed in the Area article... you are correct about sourcing the historical information, though... Horus Kol 16:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: It needs work, but it is more than a crufty stub like most camp articles start as. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 11:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It's time for the merge tag to go. --evrik (talk) 04:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed them. Evrik is correct. There is no support for the merge in nearly a month. --Bduke 05:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]