User talk:Mchacon89: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:30, 25 April 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Mchacon89, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Db099221 03:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

God

Thank you for experimenting with the page God on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. NawlinWiki 20:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Portal:RuneScape/Did you know

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Portal:RuneScape/Did you know, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 02:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THAT WAS A FALSE REVERT. DON'T DO THAT AGAIN. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mchacon89 (talk • contribs).

If I was in error, I apologise, but you need to provide reliable citations for the following:

... That the city Lumbridge comes from London Bridge, located in Lake Havasu,Arizona, USA.
... That Brimhaven combines Birmingham and Winterhaven
... That Falador is a quote to "Fall a Door" in folkloric song
... That Draynor Manor's house is similar to the Adam's Family

Furthermore, the statement:

... That the town Remington in honor of Frederick Remington who was a writer at time of war.

is irrelevant as there is no town named Remington in the game (you are probably confusing it with Rimmington).

You may wish to read Wikipedia:No original research. Thank you, CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 02:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To CaptainVindaloo

I really apologize for reverting your ideas, but I want to tell you that the "Did You Know" article has been united entirely as well by all these users modifying it. Please forgive my little typos and yet I did delete the "Fall a Door" quote since I cant remember the reference to it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mchacon89 (talk • contribs).

Sorry, but you can't cite Wikipedia articles. Especially as the articles you are linking to do not support your claims or even mention RuneScape. Oh, by the way, for internal links you do not need to type out the full URL, just the article name. IE; not [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Main Page]]; you need only type [[Main Page]]. Thanks, CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 16:29, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me, CaptainVindaloo, the rest of the article is still uncited though the claims as well may be "Original Research", there are no exterior links to cite it, or am I lying? Even I got a user who was on my side, (thank you Below Me), and still more to come, I've asked them permission to post their names too.

Just to let you know Wikipedia is not for a paper war, as stated in the 5 pillars. Anything else than this, I agree on your points. Thanks, Mchacon89 ^{t c e} 06:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not defending the rest of the content on that page, but most of it is citable, being merely observations of things that happen in the game. There will be RS kbase pages, fansite pages and so forth supporting it. None of the other content is original theories of the origin of names of ingame places. For these kinds of controversial theories, you must supply a reliable source to support it. In this case, a reliable source could be an interview with a Jagex developer, for example. By the way, when you say "paper war", I think you are confusing edit wars and how Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia. There is no mention of "paper wars" in Wikipedia:Five pillars. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 16:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me, by being honest, what things posted involved an interview with a Jagex Developer or a Reliable source? I think none, and there you can't prove me, because I even got users on my side, saying that there are no exterior links, tell me, am I wrong? And then you say that it will be cited later ("There will be..") When? I mean, hello? Don't spam the articles with original reasearch, or theories. And by the way, I really liked the term "paper wars" that I acquired from The American Pageant from Houghton Mifflin, can't I use it, it means about the same.

Mchacon89 ^{t c e} 03:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The existing content isn't in dispute, but can easily be cited from fansite 'easter eggs' pages or wherever, although I never said I liked the content of that page. I have been considering giving it a cut back. What you are adding requires something like a developer interview because it is quite controversial, as we can see. Can you also please refrain from calling in people to keep readding it? Such practices, usually known as 'meatpuppetry', are generally frowned upon. I previously promised to stop removing the statements from the page, but I had to break this promise when an IP came along and readded them, this time with blatantly fabricated sources, which can be potentially more damaging to Wikipedia than any original research. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 16:34, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I have made a request at Wikipedia:Third opinion for help resolving this dispute. Thanks, CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 17:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shut the hell up and don't send me that crap of 5 Pillars of Wikipedia. I know the rules. I will revert your articles don't worry. I got people on my side. I even got FFM2 to post the articles. This person even cited them. What else you want? Quit bothering. Period. End of discussion. Swallow your words. Sign your name here If you agree users:
Mchacon89
Below Me
The Last Supper (comment: Wow, that's very agressive but I bet this person deserves it, for being a pain in the ass
FFM2 (is that Cap. Vindaloo messing around? F him off

Is the page going to be deleted? It's not my fault - Mchacon89

Please read the core Wikipedia policies WP:NOR and WP:V, which clearly state that original theories are unnacceptable, and that controversial claims must be cited to a reliable source; instead of bringing in others to 'back you up'. The citations supplied are clearly fabricated: there is no 'Robert Lantz' in the Jagex credits page (and a link to the Jagex site when citing an interview elsewhere is useless anyway), and according to Google searches, 'Nrdmxl Labs' and 'Juega Sucio' apparently do not exist (producing no results and only irrelevant results, respectively). Two of the four claims remain uncited. All you need to do is to cite real sources, as I have asked three times, and I will leave you alone. There is absolutely no need for this. Thank you, CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 14:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This people 'backing me up' are really people who read this cheat magazine, and its mostly sold in Baja California, Sonora, and Mexico City (for sure). A supporter of mine, had sent an email to Robert L, of Jagex staff and even lent me the account by giving me the pass so that I could read it. And once again, the article needs some sources, a banner was placed at the article to remind users of that. Instead adding more content, a list of references should be given, like from a fansite: Tip.it , Zybez, Runehq, or Sal. Mchacon89 21:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your fault?

Maybe not. Still don't blame it on this user who reverts your articles. Blame it on everyone, because it has no exterior links. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Madafaka (talk • contribs) 03:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

@@ Line 59: / Line 59: @@
 This people 'backing me up' are really people who read this cheat magazine, and its mostly sold in Baja California, Sonora, and Mexico City (for sure). A supporter of mine, had sent an email to Robert L, of Jagex staff and even lent me the account by giving me the pass so that I could read it. And once again, the article needs some sources, a banner was placed at the article to remind users of that. Instead adding more content, a list of references should be given, like from a fansite: Tip.it , Zybez, Runehq, or Sal.
+[[User:Mchacon89|Mchacon89]] 21:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 == Your fault? ==